Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Options Watermill Lodge

Outstandingpublished 9 March 2018, 8 years ago

Rated Outstanding: inspectors found the home performing exceptionally well.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
People were supported safely. Inspectors found good safeguarding, recruitment, risk management, medicines systems, staffing and premises checks.
Effective?
Outstanding
Staff had specialist training and a strong understanding of autism, health needs, communication and positive behaviour support. People were supported to improve their independence and wellbeing.
Caring?
Outstanding
Staff were compassionate, kind and respectful. People were involved in decisions about their care, activities, holidays and daily lives.
Responsive?
Outstanding
Support was tailored closely to each person's needs, preferences and communication. People were helped to take part in activities and try new experiences.
Well-led?
Outstanding
The home had a strong person-centred culture, approachable management and regular quality checks. Feedback, incidents and complaints were reviewed and used to improve the service.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2018

Options Watermill Lodge was rated Outstanding overall; inspectors found exceptional personalised care, with safety rated Good.

Inspectors visited on two days. The first visit was unannounced. They observed care, spoke with a person using the service and staff, and contacted relatives and professionals. They reviewed care files, medicines records, recruitment checks, complaints, incidents, audits and other records.

The home supported four younger adults with learning disabilities, autism and complex needs. Inspectors found care was highly personalised. People were supported to make choices, build independence, take part in activities and try new experiences in a planned way.

Medicines, safeguarding, staffing and recruitment were managed safely. The home was clean and well maintained. Staff were kind and skilled, and worked closely with health professionals. The home had strong leadership and systems for checking quality and learning from events.

The overall rating was Outstanding, and this was unchanged from the previous inspection. Safe was rated Good. Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led were all rated Outstanding.

What inspectors praised
  • Highly personalised support

    Care plans and daily support were tailored to each person's needs, communication, interests and goals. People were encouraged to make choices and develop independence.

    “The strong person-centred culture apparent at our previous inspection continued to be a driving force in delivering a consistent approach to support” from the report
  • Safe medicines and risk management

    Medicines were obtained, stored, given and disposed of safely. Risk assessments supported planned positive risk-taking without exposing people to unacceptable risks.

    “Medication administration records (MARs) were completed correctly without omissions.” from the report
  • Communication and inclusion

    The home used creative communication methods and accessible information. People were supported to communicate, join activities and build relationships.

    “Creative and person centred communication plans seen, covered all aspects of people's individual communication needs” from the report
  • Strong leadership

    Managers were approachable and visible. The provider worked with other organisations and used quality checks, feedback and learning from incidents to improve the service.

    “Systems were in place that continuously assessed and monitored the quality of the service.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How would you match your support approach to my relative's communication needs and personal preferences?
  2. 02How do you plan and review positive risk-taking for people who want to try new activities or holidays?
  3. 03What specialist autism and positive behaviour support training would the staff supporting my relative have?
  4. 04How are relatives involved in care plan reviews and decisions about activities, health care and daily life?
  5. 05How do you monitor medicines, incidents and safeguarding concerns, and how would you tell us about any problems?

This was a comprehensive inspection covering the premises, care provided and all five CQC questions; the report's cover lists 26 and 29 January 2018, while its background section says 25 and 29 January 2018. This explanation was written from the published report of 9 March 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Options Watermill Lodge

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Outstanding rating throughout.

  1. March 2018Outstandingcurrent ratingstayed Outstanding
    Safe: GoodEffective: OutstandingCaring: OutstandingResponsive: OutstandingWell-led: Outstanding

    Read what inspectors found at Options Watermill Lodge →

  2. March 2016Outstanding
    Safe: GoodEffective: OutstandingCaring: OutstandingResponsive: OutstandingWell-led: Outstanding

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. November 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. June 2013

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 26 June 2013.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

32 live-in carers within about an hour of North Lincolnshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,300 a week. 29 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“What truly stands out is how mindful and attentive she is to all of my medical needs, always going above and beyond to ensure I’m comfortable and well cared for.”
Lucy K., about Emma H.
“Martin was more than a carer, he managed the home and became my uncle's best friend, enriching his life during his last few years.”
Julie V., about Martin G.
See live-in carers near North LincolnshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.