Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Options Applegate House

Outstandingpublished 28 July 2017, 9 years ago

Rated Outstanding: inspectors found the home performing exceptionally well.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
People were protected from abuse and avoidable harm, and there were enough staff to meet assessed needs. Medicines records were accurately completed and medicines were audited daily.
Effective?
Outstanding
Staff had specialist training and used personalised communication and sensory plans. People were supported with health appointments, healthy eating, decision-making and developing daily living skills.
Caring?
Outstanding
People were involved in planning their support and activities. Staff understood their personalities, wishes, communication and progress, and promoted independence, dignity and choice.
Responsive?
Good
Care plans were detailed and person-centred. People were supported to plan holidays, activities, transitions and community involvement, and complaints were investigated and resolved wherever possible.
Well-led?
Outstanding
The home had open leadership, motivated staff and strong quality checks. Managers used feedback, meetings, audits and learning from incidents to improve the service.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, July 2017

Rated Outstanding; inspectors found highly personalised, caring support, with safe and responsive care rated Good.

Inspectors visited on 23 and 27 June 2017. They observed care, spoke with people, relatives, staff and professionals, and checked care files, medicines records, recruitment, training, complaints, incidents and audits.

They found a strong person-centred approach. Staff knew people well and supported them to make choices, build skills, take carefully considered risks and become more independent. Care plans included detailed information about communication, sensory needs and behaviour.

The home was rated Outstanding overall. Effective, caring and well-led were Outstanding. Safe and responsive were Good. The report says the overall rating remained Outstanding, as it had been at the previous inspection.

What inspectors praised
  • Personalised independence

    Support was adapted to each person. People were encouraged to make choices, try new things and develop practical skills for more independent living.

    “Personalised programmes and flexible staffing arrangements enabled people to learn to live fulfilled and meaningful lives.” from the report
  • Specialist autism support

    The home used sensory assessments, individual communication plans and specialist training to help staff understand and support each person.

    “People received an outstanding level of effective care based on current best practice for people with autism.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Inspectors found a strong person-centred culture. Staff supported people to lead their own planning and respected their wishes, relationships and preferred ways of communicating.

    “We saw there was a strong person centred culture apparent within the service.” from the report
  • Strong leadership

    Managers and staff shared clear values and worked together consistently. Audits, feedback and incident reviews were used to monitor and improve care.

    “The culture of the service was honest, open and inclusive, which enabled staff to raise concerns.” from the report
  • Safe staffing and medicines

    There were enough staff to provide personalised support. Recruitment checks, staff training and medicines systems were in place.

    “Sufficient staff were available to meet people's needs and to provide personalised care and support with activities.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How would you adapt support to my relative's communication style, including any non-verbal communication or visual tools they use?
  2. 02What sensory assessment and support would be completed for my relative, and how would this affect their daily routines and environment?
  3. 03How would you support my relative to build independence in areas such as travel, money, cooking, laundry or work?
  4. 04How are relatives involved in care reviews, best-interest decisions and planning activities or holidays?
  5. 05How do you decide staffing levels and make sure staff have the specialist training needed for my relative's needs?

This was a comprehensive inspection covering all five key questions and the overall rating. This explanation was written from the published report of 28 July 2017 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Options Applegate House

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Outstanding rating throughout.

  1. July 2017Outstandingcurrent ratingstayed Outstanding
    Safe: GoodEffective: OutstandingCaring: OutstandingResponsive: GoodWell-led: Outstanding

    Read what inspectors found at Options Applegate House →

  2. July 2015Outstanding
    Safe: GoodEffective: OutstandingCaring: OutstandingResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. September 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. March 2013

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 14 March 2013.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

32 live-in carers within about an hour of North Lincolnshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,300 a week. 29 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“What truly stands out is how mindful and attentive she is to all of my medical needs, always going above and beyond to ensure I’m comfortable and well cared for.”
Lucy K., about Emma H.
“Martin was more than a carer, he managed the home and became my uncle's best friend, enriching his life during his last few years.”
Julie V., about Martin G.
See live-in carers near North LincolnshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.