Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Northenden House

Goodpublished 5 May 2023, 3 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors found safe medicines management, robust risk assessments, safeguarding systems and sufficient staffing. Infection prevention arrangements were also judged satisfactory.
Effective?
Good
This key question was not inspected during this focused visit. Its previous rating was used when calculating the overall rating.
Caring?
Good
This key question was not inspected during this focused visit. Its previous rating was used when calculating the overall rating.
Responsive?
Good
This key question was not inspected during this focused visit. Its previous rating was used when calculating the overall rating.
Well-led?
Good
Inspectors found clear management roles, regular audits, learning from incidents and good involvement of people, relatives and staff.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, May 2023

Northenden House is rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and person-centred care, with some maintenance still being addressed.

This was an unannounced focused inspection. One inspector visited on 30 March 2023 and reviewed records, medicines, staffing, safety checks and management systems. They observed care, activities and a medicine round, and spoke with seven staff members.

The home was rated Good for Safe and Well-led. Inspectors found that medicines were managed safely, risks were assessed, safeguarding systems were in place and staffing was sufficient. People were supported to make choices, take part in activities and access the community.

The previous inspection rated the service Requires Improvement because medicines records were not accurate and Regulation 17 had been breached. This inspection found enough improvement, so the home was no longer in breach. The overall rating changed to Good, but the other three areas were not inspected during this visit and their previous ratings were carried forward.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe medicines

    Medicines records were complete, storage was secure and nurses carried out regular checks. The previous medicines recording problem had been addressed.

    “Medication administration records (MAR's) were completed in full with no errors or omissions.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Staff knew people well and supported their choices, independence and individual needs. Care plans were regularly reviewed and reflected the care provided.

    “People received kind and person-centred care. Staff responded to individuals needs well and supported them appropriately.” from the report
  • Community activities

    People were supported to take part in meaningful activities and go into the community, including trips to the park, shop and farm.

    “People were supported to take part in meaningful activities including having access to the community, this included trips to the park, the shop and a farm.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Maintenance needed

    minor

    Some maintenance was still needed after damage caused by a previous resident. The report says this was being addressed, but it does not say when it would be completed.

    “The home required some maintenance following some damage from a previous resident however this was being looked at by the service.” from the report
  • Domestic support

    minor

    Staff said they would benefit from a dedicated domestic worker. The report still judged staffing sufficient, but this could affect how much time staff have for care and support.

    “staff told us they would benefit from a dedicated domestic staff member to allow them to focus on care and support.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What maintenance work is still outstanding, and when will it be completed?
  2. 02Have you added dedicated domestic support since the inspection?
  3. 03How do you make sure medicines records remain complete and accurate?
  4. 04How are people supported to choose activities and access the local community?
  5. 05What changes were made after the previous inspection's concerns about medicines records?

This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the other three ratings were carried over from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 5 May 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, May 2022

Northenden House was rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found kind, person-centred care but medicines management and oversight were not reliable enough.

This was an unannounced focused inspection. Inspectors visited from 15 to 19 March 2022, observed care and activities, spoke with people, staff, relatives and professionals, and checked care, medicines, recruitment and management records.

People were supported to make choices, stay independent and take part in activities. Inspectors saw kind and compassionate care, respectful staff and support that reflected people's communication needs and personal routines.

The home had improved its staffing, fire safety, equipment checks and quality monitoring. However, medicine records were not always accurate, returned medicines were not stored in line with guidance, and some checks did not identify these problems.

The overall rating was Requires Improvement. Safe and Well-led were also rated Requires Improvement. The other three areas were not inspected during this visit, so their previous ratings were used in the overall rating.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and respectful care

    Inspectors saw people receiving compassionate care. Staff protected people's privacy and dignity.

    “People received kind and compassionate care. Staff protected and respected people's privacy and dignity.” from the report
  • Support for communication needs

    Staff understood different ways people communicated, including body language, sounds, signs, pictures and symbols.

    “People who had individual ways of communicating, using body language, sounds, Makaton (a form of sign language), pictures and symbols could interact comfortably with staff and others involved in their care and support because staff had the necessary skills to understand them.” from the report
  • Staffing and activities

    Staffing levels were sufficient during the inspection. People were supported to follow their chosen activities and interests.

    “Staffing levels were appropriate to meet the needs of the people using the service.” from the report
  • Improved safety arrangements

    The home had improved its fire safety, equipment maintenance and infection control arrangements.

    “We found improvements to the homes fire safety arrangements, with a new fire risk assessment in place and enhanced fire drills taking place.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Medicine records and storage

    serious

    Medicine directions were not always copied correctly onto administration charts. Returned medicines and medicine fridge temperatures were also not managed fully in line with guidance.

    “Medicines records were not always accurate, which meant there was a risk medicines might be given unsafely.” from the report
  • Incident analysis

    needs fixing

    Staff responded to incidents, but the home needed to examine them in more detail to identify patterns and help prevent them happening again.

    “However, the service needed to analyse incidents such as Antecedent, a Behavior, and a Consequence (ABC forms) in greater detail to look for any potential trends or patterns to prevent recurrences of incidents.” from the report
  • Use of current guidance

    minor

    CQC recommended that the provider update its practice and staff learning against the Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture guidance.

    “We found the service was not fully up to speed with this key guidance.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What changes have been made to ensure medicine directions are copied accurately onto administration charts?
  2. 02How are returned medicines now stored and how are medicine fridge temperatures recorded?
  3. 03How are incidents and ABC forms now analysed for patterns and repeated risks?
  4. 04Who is currently responsible for managing the home, and how often are they on site?
  5. 05What action has been taken in response to the Right Support, Right Care, Right Culture recommendation?

This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the other ratings were carried forward from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 27 May 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Northenden House

4 rated inspections over 4 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

  1. May 2023Goodcurrent ratingup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Northenden House →

  2. May 2022Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Northenden House →

  3. September 2020Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. August 2019Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. May 2018

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 17 May 2018.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Trafford

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 91 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“Primrose is a very kind and compassionate healthcare professional”
Marion L., about Primrose N.
“She is an exemplary carer, she is knowledgable empathetic and very respectful in the home.”
Katrina R., about Camille F.
See live-in carers near TraffordProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.