Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Newfield Lodge Rest Home

Goodpublished 10 October 2019, 6 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors were assured about most infection prevention and control arrangements, including PPE, testing, cleaning and visiting. They were only somewhat assured that outbreaks could be prevented or managed because not all vulnerable staff groups had been risk assessed in line with current guidance.
Effective?
Good
This question was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
Caring?
Good
This question was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
Responsive?
Good
This question was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
Well-led?
Good
This question was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, January 2022

Newfield Lodge Rest Home was inspected but not rated; inspectors found mostly good infection control, but some staff risk assessments were incomplete.

This was an announced, targeted inspection on 20 January 2022. Inspectors looked at infection prevention and control, visiting arrangements and staffing pressures linked to COVID-19. They spoke with four staff members.

Inspectors were assured about visitor screening, PPE, testing, social distancing, cleaning and safe admissions. The home had measures to manage COVID-19 staff pressures. During restrictions, people were supported to keep in touch with family and friends by video calls, telephone calls and a newsletter.

Inspectors were only somewhat assured that infection outbreaks could be prevented or managed effectively. Some vulnerable staff groups had not had risk assessments in line with current guidance. The service was inspected but not rated, so this report does not provide a full overall quality rating.

What inspectors praised
  • Visitor safety

    Visitors were screened for COVID-19 symptoms and supported to follow testing, vaccination, PPE and social distancing arrangements. Visits were safely facilitated in residents' rooms.

    “There were clear processes in place for visitors to the service.” from the report
  • Infection control equipment

    The home had a large supply of PPE, hand sanitising points throughout the building and staff training on using PPE safely.

    “There was a large quantity of PPE in stock.” from the report
  • Cleaning

    A dedicated housekeeping team carried out enhanced cleaning throughout the day to reduce the risk of cross infection.

    “Enhanced cleaning was being completed by a dedicated housekeeping team throughout the day, to ensure the home remained clean and the risk of cross infection was reduced.” from the report
  • Keeping families in touch

    When visits could not take place because of risk, the home supported contact through video calls, telephone calls and a newsletter.

    “When visiting was not possible due to risk, the provider supported people to stay in contact with family and friends through regular video calls, telephone calls and a newsletter.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Incomplete staff risk assessments

    needs fixing

    Not all vulnerable staff groups had been risk assessed in line with current guidance. Inspectors signposted the provider to resources to improve its approach.

    “This was because not all vulnerable staff groups had been risk assessed in line with current guidance.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Which vulnerable staff groups had not been risk assessed, and have all these assessments now been completed?
  2. 02What changes have been made to prevent or manage infection outbreaks more effectively?
  3. 03How will visiting work during any future COVID-19 outbreak or period of increased infection risk?
  4. 04How often are PPE supplies, hand sanitising points and enhanced cleaning checked?
  5. 05How are people supported to stay in contact with family if visits are restricted?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control, visiting arrangements and COVID-19-related staffing pressures; it did not assess the other four questions and the service was not rated. This explanation was written from the published report of 28 January 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, April 2021

Inspected but not rated; inspectors found good infection prevention arrangements during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The CQC carried out an announced, targeted inspection on 8 March 2021. It looked only at infection prevention and control measures in the home.

Inspectors found staff supported people and relatives to understand COVID-19 safety measures. They saw staff using personal protective equipment properly, with signs and processes to guide its use.

The home had regular infection control audits, testing arrangements and an up-to-date COVID-19 policy. The service was inspected but not rated, so this report does not give an overall quality rating.

What inspectors praised
  • Staff support and guidance

    Dedicated staff helped people and relatives understand COVID-19 precautions, isolation processes and how the home could help keep people safe.

    “The service had dedicated staff to ensure people were received safely and continued to be supported in the service in accordance with national guidance.” from the report
  • Use of PPE

    Inspectors saw signs around the home and processes for putting on, removing and disposing of PPE. Staff were observed wearing it appropriately.

    “We observed signage around the home to guide staff on the use of PPE.” from the report
  • Regular monitoring

    The home had several infection control audits and protocols. Inspectors found the audits were current and completed regularly.

    “Audits were in place and we found them to be up to date and undertaken regularly.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are staff currently trained and checked on using PPE?
  2. 02How do you currently manage visits and protect people from catching or spreading infections?
  3. 03How often are infection prevention audits completed, and can families see the latest findings?
  4. 04How do you test new residents and staff for infections?
  5. 05What is your current plan for preventing and managing an infection outbreak?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control measures only, and the service was inspected but not rated. This explanation was written from the published report of 21 April 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Newfield Lodge Rest Home

3 rated inspections over 5 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. January 2022Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Newfield Lodge Rest Home →

  2. April 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Newfield Lodge Rest Home →

  3. October 2019Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. March 2017Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. February 2015Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. September 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. December 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. June 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 12 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

85 live-in carers within about an hour of Lancashire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 78 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“She understands the needs of an elderly person in the early stages of dementia and has treated my mother with great kindness and skill.”
Simon W., about Ncebakazi V.
“Thanks to Tracy, Dad was always immaculately dressed and clean, his meals were all home cooked and nutritionally well balanced and his home was always kept really clean and tidy.”
Jackie S., about Tracy O.
See live-in carers near LancashireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.