CQC report explained · a residential care home
What the CQC found at New Lane
Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.
- Safe?
- Good
- Inspectors found thorough assessments, clear risk records, safe medicines systems, suitable staffing and infection control measures. People said they felt safe and supported.
- Effective?
- Good
- This area was not inspected during this focused visit. Its previous rating was used in calculating the overall rating.
- Caring?
- Good
- This area was not inspected during this focused visit. Its previous rating was used in calculating the overall rating.
- Responsive?
- Good
- This area was not inspected during this focused visit. Its previous rating was used in calculating the overall rating.
- Well-led?
- Good
- Inspectors found quality assurance systems, open handling of complaints and suggestions, good partnership working and support that was person-centred and inclusive.
What inspectors found, June 2021
New Lane rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and well-organised support, with the inspection focused only on safety and leadership.
This was a focused inspection on 6 May 2021. It followed notification of a specific incident, but inspectors found no evidence that people were at risk of harm from this concern.
The home supported up to seven people for short stays linked to mental health crisis support. Inspectors spoke with two people, staff and health professionals, and reviewed care plans, medicines records, staff files and management records.
Safety and leadership were both rated Good. Inspectors found suitable risk assessments, safe medicines systems, enough staff, infection control measures and quality checks. The other three areas were not inspected at this visit, so their previous ratings were used for the overall Good rating.
Safe medicines
Medicines were managed through clear systems. Records were complete, kept up to date and checked regularly.
“Medicines records were complete and up to date and were audited regularly.” from the report
Person-centred support
Inspectors found that support was tailored to people and respected their choices, equality needs and independence.
“The support provided was extremely person-centred and inclusive.” from the report
People felt listened to
People said staff gave them control, listened to them and offered support without pressure.
“There is no pressure to do anything you don't want to do. It is a supportive network.” from the report
Quality monitoring
The home used audits, feedback, complaints and incidents to identify learning and improve the service.
“The service took learning from analysing the results of their audits and quality checks.” from the report
Partnership working
The home worked with health, social care and other agencies to support treatment plans and respond to concerns.
“The service worked in partnership with a number of other agencies and professionals, including local authority teams and the Clinical Commissioning Group.” from the report
Registered manager vacancy
minorThe home had an acting manager and had been without a registered manager for a short while. The provider was actively looking for someone to take up the role soon.
“The service had an acting manager but had been without a registered manager for a short while.” from the report
- 01Who is currently managing the home, and has a new registered manager now started?
- 02How are risk assessments reviewed during a person's short stay?
- 03How are medicines records checked and any errors followed up?
- 04How will my relative's views be used to review and improve their support?
- 05How will the home work with the clinical team and other professionals involved in my relative's care?
This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; Effective, Caring and Responsive were not inspected and their previous ratings were carried forward. This explanation was written from the published report of 3 June 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
What inspectors found, October 2019
New Lane was rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind, personalised short-term care, with minor gaps in communication planning and feedback.
This was a planned inspection on 10 September 2019. The inspector spoke with two people and four staff, and checked care records, medicines, recruitment, training, safety records and quality checks.
The home provides short-term accommodation and personal care for up to seven adults with a range of needs. Inspectors found people felt safe, staff were kind, medicines were managed safely and care was planned around people's goals and preferences.
All five areas were rated Good: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. The overall rating stayed Good, the same as at the previous inspection published in March 2017.
Safe medicines management
Inspectors found medicines were stored securely, recorded correctly and given as prescribed. Staff had training and regular checks of their competence.
“People received their medicines as prescribed. Medicines were securely stored and documented on medication administration records.” from the report
Kind and respectful care
People said staff were caring and supportive, especially when they were struggling with their mental health. Staff respected privacy, dignity and personal choice.
“People told us they were treated as individuals and were given time and space to gather their thoughts.” from the report
Personalised short-term support
Care plans included preferences and goals, such as where people wanted to live and how they wanted to spend their time. Staff supported people to prepare for returning home or moving on.
“The care plans captured any likes, dislikes and personal preferences including if the person would like to make their own meals and where they preferred to spend time.” from the report
Supportive management
Staff said they were well supported. Audits, staff meetings and training were used to monitor the service and help staff develop.
“Regular staff meetings were held to share ideas and update the staff team.” from the report
Communication needs
minorThe home had information available and staff knew about the Accessible Information Standard. However, it did not usually identify people's specific communication needs unless those needs became clear.
“However, the service did not usually identify with people who had specific communication needs.” from the report
Feedback was not fully collated
minorThe manager had started collecting feedback from people who had stayed at the home, but this work was not complete. Inspectors said they would review it at the next inspection.
“So far feedback had been positive but had not been fully collated.” from the report
- 01How will you identify and record my relative's specific communication needs before or during their stay?
- 02How will you use feedback from people who have stayed at the home, now that it was not fully collated at the inspection?
- 03What goals would you set with my relative for their short-term stay and how would you measure progress?
- 04How would staff support my relative if their mental health became worse or they needed to return to hospital?
- 05How would you involve my relative in planning their move back home or to another property?
This was a planned comprehensive inspection covering all five ratings, including the premises and care, and the ratings remained Good from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 4 October 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of New Lane
3 rated inspections over 4 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.
- June 2021Goodcurrent ratingstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- October 2019Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodWell-led: Good
- March 2017GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- July 2016
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 1 July 2016.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.
Weigh the report against the rest
Fees, photos and reviews from families
How to read CQC ratings and reports
What to check when you visit
At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Bolton
These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.
Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 92 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.
“Primrose is a very kind and compassionate healthcare professional”
“He developed a close affinity with Terence, spending time talking with him before he retired to bed and looking after his needs during the night.”
Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.