Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Murach House

Goodpublished 2 April 2026, 6 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, September 2018

Murach House was rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care with strong support for independence.

This was the home’s first CQC inspection since it registered in August 2017. Inspectors visited on 18 July 2018 and gave the home 24 hours’ notice. They observed care, spoke with relatives, the manager and staff, and checked care plans, medicines records, incident records, complaints and audits.

The inspectors found that people were protected from harm and received their medicines safely. Staffing levels, recruitment checks, risk assessments and emergency plans were in place. People had access to healthcare, suitable food and specialist support.

Staff were described and observed as kind, patient and respectful. Care plans reflected people’s communication needs, preferences and interests. People were supported to take part in activities, maintain family relationships and develop daily living skills.

The home had a positive culture and regular checks on the quality of care. All five areas were rated Good: safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led. This was the first inspection, so there was no earlier CQC rating to compare.

What inspectors praised
  • Detailed safety planning

    Risk and positive behaviour support plans gave staff detailed guidance about people’s needs, triggers and safe support. Incidents were reviewed and changes were made when needed.

    “The plans were very detailed and demonstrated an in-depth knowledge of each person's support needs and personalities.” from the report
  • Safe medicines

    Medicines were securely stored and records showed they were given as prescribed. The report also noted regular reviews and work to avoid unnecessary medication.

    “There were no recording gaps in MAR charts and the stock counts matched the relevant records.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful staff

    Inspectors observed relaxed, positive relationships between people and staff. Privacy, dignity and personal freedom were respected.

    “Staff interacted with people in a kind and caring manner and it was evident close relationships had developed between people and staff.” from the report
  • Personalised activities

    Each person had an activity programme based on their needs, hobbies and interests. People were supported at home and in the community.

    “Each person had an individual activity programme in place which was designed around their needs, hobbies and interests.” from the report
  • Support for independence

    People were encouraged to take part in everyday tasks and develop new skills. This included cooking, cleaning, shopping and managing household activities.

    “People were encouraged to take an active role in the day to day running of the service and in developing independent living skills.” from the report
  • Quality checks

    Regular audits tracked incidents, complaints, safeguarding, training and other areas. The report found that identified shortfalls were addressed promptly.

    “There was a clear trail of quality audits which showed that where shortfalls had been identified, these were addressed promptly.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Weight and portion sizes

    minor

    Some people had gained weight since moving in. The manager had started work with staff on portion sizes, so families may want to ask how this was monitored.

    “The registered manager told us they had begun to work with staff on looking at portion sizes to ensure this did not become an issue in the future.” from the report
  • Goal planning still developing

    minor

    The home was working on goal planning with people, but the report said this work was still in progress.

    “This showed that the service was currently working on goal planning with people. There was evidence that this work was in progress.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How do you currently monitor people’s weight, food portions and healthy eating?
  2. 02How are people involved in setting and reviewing their personal goals?
  3. 03How do you make sure risk and positive behaviour support plans stay up to date when someone’s needs or triggers change?
  4. 04What activities and community opportunities would be available for my relative?
  5. 05How would you support my relative to maintain contact with family and build independence?

This was the first inspection since registration and covered all five CQC areas, including care, accommodation, records and how the home was managed. This explanation was written from the published report of 11 September 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Murach House

Each visit the CQC has published, newest first, back to the day the home was registered.

  1. September 2018Goodcurrent rating
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Murach House →

  2. July 2017

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 25 July 2017.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

77 live-in carers within about an hour of Surrey

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,250 a week. 66 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“Without his support we wouldn't have been able to navigate bringing and keeping Dad at home.”
Emma P., about Aman A.
“Not only has she looked after him beautifully, she has also been great company for him with lively conversation, kindness and humour.”
Clare M., about Zion S.
See live-in carers near SurreyProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.