Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Meadowcroft Health Care Limited

Goodpublished 25 February 2026, 7 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, December 2017

Meadowcroft Health Care Limited was rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with some night staffing and planning issues to improve.

This was a comprehensive inspection on 13 November 2017. Inspectors spoke with people living at the home, relatives, staff and a healthcare professional. They also observed care and checked care records, medicines, staff training, recruitment, complaints and quality checks.

The home supported up to 24 people with nursing and mental health needs. Nineteen people were living there on the inspection day. Inspectors found people were safe, medicines were managed properly, staff were kind and respectful, and care was based on people's individual needs.

The home remained Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors identified improvements needed in night staffing, mental health training, recording people's future goals and documenting actions from meetings.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and respectful staff

    People and relatives spoke positively about staff. Inspectors saw calm, warm and caring interactions, including support when someone was distressed or in pain.

    “The atmosphere of the home was relaxed and calm; it was apparent from talking with the staff and registered manager this approach was important” from the report
  • Personalised care

    Care plans included people's needs, routines, preferences and personal histories. People and relatives were involved in assessments and care reviews.

    “Information available for staff gave clear detailed guidance about their diverse needs, routines, preferences and what was important to them.” from the report
  • Safe medicines and risk management

    Inspectors found medicines were ordered, stored and given safely. Risks were assessed and people were involved in decisions about how risks were managed.

    “We found the ordering, storing and management of medicines followed best practice guidance.” from the report
  • Activities and community access

    People were supported to take part in activities they chose, including baking, art and community outings. Staff responded to requests to go outside or into the garden.

    “The home had a mini bus and used taxi's to support people on community activities.” from the report
  • Quality checks and improvement

    The home used regular audits, meetings and an improvement plan to monitor safety and care. The management team showed a commitment to making further improvements.

    “There was a system of audits and processes in place that continually checked on quality and safety.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Night staffing

    needs fixing

    Staff raised concerns about the number and deployment of staff at night. The manager agreed to review this to ensure people remained safe.

    “night time staffing levels and deployment required further reviewing.” from the report
  • Mental health training

    needs fixing

    The staff training plan did not include mental health needs training at the time of inspection. Plans were being developed to address this.

    “We noted the training plan for staff did not include training in mental health needs.” from the report
  • Future goals not recorded

    needs fixing

    People's interests and hobbies were not always fully recorded, and their future goals and aspirations had not been identified. The manager said further work was planned.

    “We also noted people's goals and aspirations for the future had not been identified.” from the report
  • Meeting actions

    minor

    Some meeting records did not say what action was needed, who was responsible or when it should be completed. New recording tools had been introduced.

    “We noted meeting records did not always detail action that was required, by whom with timescales.” from the report
  • Agency nurse reliance

    needs fixing

    External feedback raised concerns about reliance on agency nurses and its effect on communication with professionals and management. Permanent nursing staff had recently been recruited.

    “External feedback raised some concerns with the reliance on agency nurses to cover shortfalls in staffing” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How have night staffing levels and staff deployment been reviewed since the inspection?
  2. 02What mental health training have staff completed since inspectors identified this gap?
  3. 03How are people's interests, future goals and aspirations recorded and reviewed now?
  4. 04How much does the home currently rely on agency nurses, and how is information handed over to them?
  5. 05Do meeting records now show actions, named responsibilities and timescales?

This was a comprehensive inspection covering all five CQC questions, and the home remained Good in each area. This explanation was written from the published report of 14 December 2017 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Meadowcroft Health Care Limited

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. December 2017Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Meadowcroft Health Care Limited →

  2. February 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. November 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. July 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. October 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. August 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 13 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

75 live-in carers within about an hour of Nottinghamshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 63 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“Ernest is an amazing professional carer who delivers care from the heart.”
Melanie B., about Ernest C.
See live-in carers near NottinghamshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.