CQC report explained · a nursing home
What the CQC found at Maypole Grove
Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.
- Safe?
- Good
- Inspectors looked specifically at falls management and found that risks were assessed and reviewed, and that action was taken after falls.
- Effective?
- Good
- This question was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
- Caring?
- Good
- This question was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
- Responsive?
- Good
- This question was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
- Well-led?
- Good
- This question was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
What inspectors found, July 2022
Inspected but not rated; inspectors found the home was managing falls safely, but this was not a full inspection.
This was an unannounced, targeted inspection on 25 May 2022. One inspector reviewed information about falls management and spoke with the registered manager and clinical nurse manager.
Inspectors found that people's falls risks were assessed and reviewed. When falls happened, the home took appropriate action, examined what had happened and made changes to reduce future risks.
The inspection was prompted by a notification about a specific incident after which a person died. The inspection did not examine the circumstances of that incident. It focused only on associated concerns about falls management and found no evidence that people were at risk of harm from this concern.
The home was not given a new overall rating. Its last rating was Good on 4 November 2021. This targeted inspection did not change that rating and did not assess the whole service.
Falls risks reviewed
The home assessed and reviewed people's individual risks of falling.
“We found people's risk of falls had been appropriately assessed and reviewed.” from the report
Action after falls
The home took action after falls, investigated what happened and made changes to reduce the chance of further falls.
“Where falls had occurred, we found the provider had taken appropriate action to keep people safe.” from the report
Falls monitoring system
Inspectors found a system for identifying patterns in falls and making improvements.
“We found the provider had a robust system for managing falls within the home to identify trends and implement improvements.” from the report
Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.
- 01How are each person's falls risks assessed and reviewed now?
- 02What action is taken after someone falls, and how is their safety checked afterwards?
- 03How do you analyse falls to identify trends and decide what changes are needed?
- 04How do you check that changes made after falls have reduced future risks?
This was a targeted inspection of falls management within the Safe question; it did not assess the whole Safe question or the other key questions, and the previous ratings carried over from 4 November 2021. This explanation was written from the published report of 7 July 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
What inspectors found, December 2021
Rated Good; inspectors found safe, effective and well-led care, with improvements since the last inspection.
Inspectors made an unannounced visit on 04 November 2021. They spoke with people, relatives, staff and a health professional, and reviewed care records, medicines records, staff files and quality checks.
They found that risks were assessed and managed, medicines were given safely, and there were enough staff during the visit. People's health, dietary and support needs were being reviewed, and staff worked with health and social care professionals.
The overall rating was Good. Safe, Effective and Well-led were rated Good. This was a focused inspection, so Caring and Responsive were not inspected during this visit and earlier ratings were used.
Risks were managed
Risk assessments were in place and updated. The home also checked equipment, fire safety and water safety.
“Risks to people's health and wellbeing were managed safely and effectively.” from the report
Medicines were handled safely
Staff had the required training and were assessed as competent. Nurses carried out regular medicines audits and acted on any shortfalls.
“Staff had completed the necessary training and been assessed as competent to administer people's medicines safely.” from the report
Health needs were supported
Care plans gave staff guidance about people's health needs. The home made referrals and worked with specialist services when needed.
“The service worked in partnership with a number of specialist agencies to ensure people received the support they needed.” from the report
Management had improved
Inspectors found that earlier improvements in governance and care plan audits had become established. The management team had remained consistent.
“At this inspection, we found there had been embedded and sustained improvements, the management team had remained consistent and delivered a consistent approach to working practices.” from the report
Face coverings
needs fixingInspectors were only somewhat assured that PPE was being used safely because two staff were not wearing face coverings. The home introduced transparent face coverings after the inspection.
“Two staff were seen not wearing their face coverings.” from the report
Agency staffing
minorAgency staff were being used because of permanent vacancies. The home said it had recruited new staff and expected agency hours to reduce.
“The service had recruited new staff and expected the number of agency hours would reduce.” from the report
Large care files
minorStaff said the care files were difficult to manage because they were large and included information that could be archived. The provider had identified this but had not yet replaced the system.
“Nursing and care staff had raised with us the size and complexity of the care files because they found them to be 'large and bulky' and contained information that could be archived.” from the report
- 01How many agency staff are currently being used, and how are you maintaining consistency for residents?
- 02What arrangements are now in place for transparent face coverings and other PPE?
- 03What is the timetable for reducing the size of care files and removing information that can be archived?
- 04How much face-to-face training do staff receive compared with e-learning?
This was a focused inspection of Safe, Effective and Well-led; Caring and Responsive were not inspected and earlier ratings were used. This explanation was written from the published report of 14 December 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Maypole Grove
4 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.
- July 2022Inspected but not ratedcurrent ratingSafe: Inspected but not rated
- December 2021Goodup from Requires improvementSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- October 2020Requires improvementstayed Requires improvementSafe: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- September 2020Requires improvementdown from GoodSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- November 2018GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- April 2017
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 25 April 2017.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.
Weigh the report against the rest
Fees, photos and reviews from families
How to read CQC ratings and reports
What to check when you visit
At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Birmingham
These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.
Most charge £950 to £1,230 a week. 79 can care for a couple. 9 years' experience on average.
“God doesn't make people like her anymore!”
“I have never met a person who is so kind and thinks about others before himself to such an extent as Chris Malagala.”
Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.