Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Madeira House

Goodpublished 15 April 2026, 5 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2019

Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with some areas of the home needing refurbishment.

This was an unannounced planned inspection on 16 October 2018. Two inspectors reviewed information, spoke with people using the service, relatives and staff, observed care, and checked care, medicine, recruitment and management records.

The inspectors rated the home Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. They found enough staff, safe medicine systems, clean surroundings, suitable food, respectful care and support that was tailored to people's needs and interests.

The home had a new manager during the inspection. The manager was approachable and was working with staff, families and local organisations to improve the service. Some parts of the building looked tired and needed decoration, but the report says this work was ongoing.

The overall Good rating means the inspectors judged that people received good-quality care and that legal requirements were met. The previous inspection was also rated Good, in a report published on 1 February 2016.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and respectful staff

    Inspectors observed warm relationships between people and staff. People and relatives also gave positive feedback about how people were treated.

    “People were cared for by kind, caring and compassionate staff from all disciplines.” from the report
  • Personalised activities

    People were supported to follow their own interests and take part in individual and group activities. The home also helped people connect with community groups.

    “People were supported to maintain their hobbies and interests and enabled to develop new ones.” from the report
  • Quality monitoring

    The manager and provider used audits, meetings and governance systems to check care and identify improvements.

    “There were robust quality monitoring and clinical governance systems and processes in place.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Some areas looked tired

    minor

    Inspectors said some parts of the home needed refurbishment and decoration. The manager said decorating was already under way.

    “Some areas of the service looked tired and would benefit from refurbishment and decoration.” from the report
  • Manager registration was pending

    minor

    The home did not have a manager registered with CQC when inspectors visited. The report says the application was authorised in November 2018.

    “The service did not have manager registered with the Care Quality Commission at the time of our inspection.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Which parts of the home still need refurbishment, and when will this work be completed?
  2. 02How has the management team changed since the inspection, and is the manager still in post?
  3. 03How many staff are on duty on day and night shifts, and how do you respond when someone needs extra help?
  4. 04How are families involved in reviewing personalised care plans and end-of-life wishes?
  5. 05What activities and community links are currently available for someone with my relative's interests and needs?

This was an unannounced planned inspection covering the premises and care, with ratings given for all five key questions. This explanation was written from the published report of 8 March 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Madeira House

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. March 2019Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Madeira House →

  2. February 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. February 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. February 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. March 2012

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 19 March 2012.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

9 live-in carers within about an hour of Lincolnshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

8 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“Martin was more than a carer, he managed the home and became my uncle's best friend, enriching his life during his last few years.”
Julie V., about Martin G.
“Magda was always positive and proactive about trying new things to keep dad busy. She also introduced new ideas for keeping dad healthy.”
Scot H., about Magdalena B.
See live-in carers near LincolnshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.