Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Lyons Court Residential Care Home

Goodpublished 13 February 2019, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors were assured that the home was managing infection risks, including testing, isolation, protective equipment, cleaning and visiting arrangements.
Effective?
Good
This question was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
Caring?
Good
This question was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
Responsive?
Good
This question was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
Well-led?
Good
This question was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, April 2021

Inspected but not rated; inspectors found good infection prevention and control arrangements during a targeted visit.

The inspection took place on 15 March 2021 and was announced. It was a targeted inspection looking at infection prevention and control because of coronavirus outbreaks in care homes.

Inspectors found good practice. The home tested people and staff, isolated new admissions, used protective equipment properly and had safe arrangements for visitors.

The home was clean and hygienic, with regular cleaning schedules. Inspectors were assured that infection risks were being managed, but the service was not given an overall rating or a Safe rating.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe admissions

    The home carried out admission assessments, considered mental capacity, tested new residents and isolated them to help prevent infection spreading.

    “Effective admission assessments despite the challenges, considered mental capacity.” from the report
  • Visitor arrangements

    Visitors could meet residents safely in a heated garden pod. A booking system helped stagger visiting times and limit numbers.

    “There was a booking system in place to stagger visitors and visiting times to minimise numbers.” from the report
  • Protective equipment

    Staff had training in using protective equipment and infection control. The home had separate areas for putting it on and taking it off.

    “Staff were trained in using Personal protective equipment (PPE) and the service had designated areas for staff to put on and remove PPE.” from the report
  • Clean environment

    Inspectors found the home clean and hygienic, with strong cleaning routines.

    “The service was clean and hygienic and robust cleaning schedules were in place.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What infection prevention and control arrangements are in place now?
  2. 02How are new residents tested and supported during any period of isolation?
  3. 03How are visitors currently booked and supported to meet residents safely?
  4. 04How often are staff trained in infection prevention, control and protective equipment?
  5. 05When was the home last inspected across the other areas of care, such as medicines, staffing and residents’ wellbeing?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control only; the service was inspected but not rated and the other areas were not assessed. This explanation was written from the published report of 2 April 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2019

Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with improvements since the previous Requires Improvement rating.

This was an unannounced inspection on 21 January 2019. One inspector and an expert by experience spoke with 13 people, five relatives, three staff members and the registered manager. They reviewed care records, medicines records, accidents, complaints and quality checks.

The inspectors found good care in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. People were protected from harm, supported by enough staff, given their medicines safely and helped to make choices. Staff were described as kind, patient and respectful.

The home had person-centred care plans, activities and complaint arrangements. The registered manager used audits, feedback and incidents to make improvements. The overall rating changed from Requires Improvement at the previous inspection, published on 14 November 2017, to Good.

What inspectors praised
  • Enough staff

    Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs promptly and safely. Staffing had recently been increased in the afternoon.

    “There were sufficient staff to support people safely.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Staff were described as caring, patient and compassionate. Inspectors saw warm interactions and support that respected people's dignity and communication needs.

    “People told us staff were exceptionally caring and warm towards them.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Care plans reflected people's individual needs and preferences. People could choose activities, food, communication methods and how they spent their time.

    “Care plans were person centred and reflected people's individual needs and preferences.” from the report
  • Learning and improvement

    The manager reviewed incidents, carried out audits and used feedback to make changes. This included increasing staffing and focusing on falls and pressure ulcers.

    “When incidents had occurred, these were used as learning opportunities.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What changes have been made to staffing since the afternoon staffing increase?
  2. 02What is the current position on the planned improvements to the double glazing?
  3. 03How will you assess and monitor my relative's risks of malnutrition or choking?
  4. 04How do you monitor and reduce the risk of falls and pressure ulcers?
  5. 05How will my relative and family be involved if their needs or care plan change?

This was a planned, unannounced inspection of the care provided and the accommodation, covering all five CQC questions and the overall rating. This explanation was written from the published report of 13 February 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Lyons Court Residential Care Home

3 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. April 2021Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Lyons Court Residential Care Home →

  2. February 2019Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Lyons Court Residential Care Home →

  3. January 2018Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. January 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. February 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. January 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. September 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. December 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 16 December 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

35 live-in carers within about an hour of Essex

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,020 to £1,260 a week. 25 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“Not only was she professional, polite and efficient but she bought a lovely smile and laughter to my parents home.”
Liz L., about Sithembiso N.
“She brought fun and stimulation into mums life.”
Robert G., about Nechelle F.
See live-in carers near EssexProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.