Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Windward Way

Goodpublished 20 October 2018, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors were assured that the home was preventing and managing infection risks. This included the use of protective equipment, testing, visitor checks, social distancing, cleaning and an up-to-date infection-control policy.
Effective?
Good
Does the care work? Training, consent, food and drink, working with GPs and nurses.
Caring?
Good
Are people treated with kindness and dignity?
Responsive?
Good
Is care built around the person? Care plans, activities, complaints.
Well-led?
Good
Is the home run well? The manager, the culture, how problems get found and fixed.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, November 2020

Lonsdale Midlands Ltd - Windward Way was inspected but not rated; inspectors found good infection-control practice.

This was a targeted, announced inspection on 23 October 2020. Inspectors looked at infection prevention and control measures during the coronavirus pandemic.

Inspectors found good practice. Visitors had risk assessments, staff worked within one bungalow, cleaning checks had increased, and people were supported to keep in touch with important people.

The home was assured on infection control, including visitors, social distancing, admissions, protective equipment, testing, cleanliness and managing outbreaks. The service was inspected but not rated, so this report does not give an overall quality rating.

What inspectors praised
  • Visitor safety

    Visitors were assessed when they arrived, with clear expectations based on current guidance.

    “A risk assessment was completed when visitors arrived at the home. The assessment explained the expectation of visitors in line with current guidance.” from the report
  • Reducing cross-infection

    Staff worked only in one bungalow, and people's clothing and bedding were washed separately.

    “Staff were deployed to work solely within one bungalow. This reduced the risk of cross transmission.” from the report
  • Communication and wellbeing

    Information was adapted so people could understand it, and people were supported to go out safely and keep contact with important people.

    “People had been supported to maintain contact with people who were important to them which included video and telephone calls.” from the report
  • Cleaning checks

    The home had increased cleaning schedules and added checks to monitor cleanliness and staff compliance with its infection-control policy.

    “Cleaning schedules had been increased and additional audits had been implemented to monitor cleanliness and staff compliance with the providers infection control policy.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How do you currently assess visitors for infection risks before they enter the home?
  2. 02Do staff still work solely within one bungalow, and how do you reduce the risk of cross transmission?
  3. 03How often are cleaning schedules and infection-control audits reviewed?
  4. 04How do you support residents to maintain contact with people important to them?
  5. 05How do you provide infection-control information in a format my relative can understand?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control measures only, and the service was inspected but not rated. This explanation was written from the published report of 6 November 2020 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, October 2018

Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with stable management and no serious risks identified.

This was an unannounced inspection on 3 September 2018. Inspectors spoke with one person living at the home, one relative, the manager and two staff members. They also observed care and checked care plans, incident records, medicines, staff meeting notes and quality checks.

The home was rated Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, safe medicine arrangements, suitable recruitment checks and staff who understood people's needs. People appeared relaxed and were supported with kindness, dignity, choice and independence.

The report says the rating remained Good, as it was at the previous inspection. It found no evidence of serious risks or concerns. Families were involved in care planning, and communication with the manager was said to have improved.

What inspectors praised
  • Staffing and safety

    Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs. Staff understood risk assessments, safeguarding and safe medicine arrangements.

    “There were enough staff to meet people's needs.” from the report
  • Kind and familiar care

    Staff knew people well, including how they communicated and what could cause anxiety. Inspectors saw people being treated with dignity and reassurance.

    “We saw people were relaxed and at ease around care staff.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Care was adapted to people's changing needs and personal interests. Families and people were involved in decisions about care, rooms and activities.

    “People and their families were involved in helping arrange people's rooms.” from the report
  • Checks and improvement

    The manager and provider checked care records, medicines and the environment. Staff were encouraged to suggest improvements and work with other services to understand people's needs.

    “The provider and registered manager had effective systems to monitor how care at the service was provided” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How do you keep each person's risk assessments and care plans updated when their health or equipment needs change?
  2. 02How are families involved in best-interest decisions and in planning future or end-of-life care?
  3. 03How do you check that medicines are given correctly and that staff remain competent to support people with them?
  4. 04What has been done to maintain the management stability mentioned in the report?
  5. 05How do you find out what a person wants if they cannot communicate their views verbally?

This was an unannounced inspection covering all five CQC questions, but inspectors spoke directly with one person and one relative and reviewed two care plans. This explanation was written from the published report of 20 October 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Windward Way

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. November 2020Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Windward Way →

  2. October 2018Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Windward Way →

  3. January 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. October 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. January 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. July 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. December 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 9 December 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Solihull

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,250 a week. 78 can care for a couple. 9 years' experience on average.

“If you bump into her in the night on her way to the bathroom she will still inquire how you are and if everything is alright.”
Caroline C., about Mary K.
“I have never met a person who is so kind and thinks about others before himself to such an extent as Chris Malagala.”
Brian G., about Chris M.
See live-in carers near SolihullProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.