Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Longacre Care Home Limited

Goodpublished 13 May 2026, 4 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, November 2018

Rated Good; inspectors found kind, personalised care, with some fire safety and staffing actions still being addressed.

This was an unannounced inspection on 29 October 2018. The inspector spoke with people living at the home, relatives, staff, the registered manager and health and care professionals. They also observed care and reviewed care plans, medicines records, staff records, accidents, complaints and quality checks.

The home was rated Good overall and Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found that people were treated with kindness, received personalised care, and had their health, food and communication needs supported.

The home had improved its activities since the previous inspection. People who spent time in their rooms were offered activities and staff spent time with them. Inspectors also noted that fire safety work was not yet complete, two safety measures needed better formal records, and the home was recruiting more registered nurses.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and respectful care

    Staff were observed speaking politely, seeking consent and protecting people's privacy. Relatives said staff were kind, helpful and respectful.

    “They treat people with dignity and respect.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Care plans included people's life histories, preferences, choices and communication needs. Staff supported people to maintain independence where appropriate.

    “The care plans were person centred and individualised to show the care each person needed.” from the report
  • Improved activities

    The home had an activities programme five days a week, with activities for people who stayed in their rooms. It also provided outings and links with community organisations.

    “At this inspection we found people were provided with a range of activities.” from the report
  • Staff training and teamwork

    Staff had relevant training, supervision and appraisals. Inspectors saw care and nursing staff working together and found good links with health services.

    “The provider and staff worked well with other organisations to provide a coordinated approach to care.” from the report
  • Good management checks

    The home had an open culture and carried out checks on areas including medicines, care plans, staff training, infection control and the environment.

    “Audits and checks were carried out regarding infection control, the safe management of medicines, staff training and supervision, care plans, health and safety, the environment, the mealtime experience and care plans.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Fire safety work unfinished

    needs fixing

    The fire and rescue service had required work to improve fire safety. This work had not been completed by the inspection, although a completion date had been agreed.

    “At the time of the inspection this had not yet been completed but the provider had agreed a date for this to be completed.” from the report
  • Registered nurse recruitment

    needs fixing

    The home was recruiting two more registered general nurses. The provider had decided not to admit more people until more staff were recruited.

    “The provider was recruiting two more RGNs and the registered manager said a decision had been made by the provider to not admit more people to the home until more staff were recruited.” from the report
  • Some safety records needed updating

    needs fixing

    A belt used to stop someone sliding from a chair had not been formally risk assessed. Two arrangements involving restraint also needed formal best-interests decisions. The manager confirmed these matters were addressed after the inspection.

    “The risks of this had not been formally assessed and recorded.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Has all the fire safety work required by the fire and rescue service now been completed?
  2. 02How many registered nurses are currently employed, and are there still plans to recruit more?
  3. 03How are chair belts, bed rails and other restrictive measures risk assessed and recorded?
  4. 04How are activities planned for people who spend time in their rooms?
  5. 05How will you respond if a person's care needs change or a family raises a complaint?

This was an unannounced inspection covering all five CQC questions, and the home was rated Good in each area. This explanation was written from the published report of 20 November 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Longacre Care Home Limited

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. November 2018Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Longacre Care Home Limited →

  2. April 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. July 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. June 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. January 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. December 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. September 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. March 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 17 March 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

28 live-in carers within about an hour of West Sussex

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,020 to £1,170 a week. 23 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

See live-in carers near West SussexProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.