CQC report explained · a residential care home
What the CQC found at Linford Grange
Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.
- Safe?
- Good
- Inspectors found people were protected from avoidable harm. They found suitable risk assessments, enough staff, safe recruitment and safe medicines arrangements.
- Effective?
- Good
- This key question was not inspected during this visit. Its previous rating was used when calculating the overall rating.
- Caring?
- Good
- This key question was not inspected during this visit. Its previous rating was used when calculating the overall rating.
- Responsive?
- Good
- This key question was not inspected during this visit. Its previous rating was used when calculating the overall rating.
- Well-led?
- Good
- Inspectors found the home was consistently managed, with audits, staff support and ways for people and relatives to give feedback.
What inspectors found, July 2023
Rated Good; inspectors found safe, person-centred care and improvements since the last inspection, but a registered manager was not yet in post.
This was an unannounced inspection on 21 June 2023. One inspector spoke with three people using the home, three staff members and the deputy manager. They also reviewed four care plans, medicines records and audits.
The home was rated Good for Safe and Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, safe medicines practices, suitable risk assessments and good safeguarding knowledge. People said they felt safe and had enough help.
The last rating, published in August 2021, was Requires Improvement. The report says improvements had been made, including renovations, better checks and stronger management arrangements. Some renovation work was still outstanding, and the manager was going through the registration process.
Risk and safeguarding
Risk assessments covered areas such as mobility, fire safety, personal care, community access and emotional distress. Staff understood how to recognise and report abuse.
“There were risk assessments in place to cover any risks present within people's lives.” from the report
Staffing
Inspectors saw enough staff available to meet people's needs. People they spoke with also said there were enough staff.
“On the day of inspection, we saw enough staff were distributed around the service to meet people's needs.” from the report
Person-centred support
Staff knew people well and supported them according to their preferences and wishes. People were supported to make choices and access health and social care services.
“Staff knew the people they were supporting well and understood how to support people in line with their preferences and wishes.” from the report
Checks and improvement
The management team used checks and audits covering staffing, medicines, the environment and records. Inspectors also noted improvements since the previous inspection.
“There were a series of checks and audits in place to ensure that all aspects of the service were monitored” from the report
Manager registration
minorThere was no registered manager in post at the inspection. The manager was going through the registration process with CQC.
“At the time of our inspection there was not a registered manager in post.” from the report
Outstanding renovation work
minorThe home had been significantly renovated, but inspectors said some further renovation was still needed. A plan was in place to complete it.
“Some further renovation was still required, and a plan was in place to complete this.” from the report
- 01Has the manager now completed the CQC registration process, and who is responsible for the home until then?
- 02What renovation work remained outstanding at the inspection, and when was it due to be completed?
- 03How are my relative's risks, including mobility, personal care or emotional distress, assessed and reviewed?
- 04How will you involve our family in care planning and collect our feedback?
- 05Which ratings were carried over from the previous inspection rather than assessed during this visit?
This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led, including infection prevention and control; the other key-question ratings were not inspected and were carried over from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 18 July 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
What inspectors found, August 2021
Rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found improved medicines and risk management, but safety systems, the environment and leadership still needed work.
This was an unannounced focused inspection on 8 July 2021. One inspector reviewed records, observed care, spoke with people, staff, relatives and professionals, and checked infection control. The inspection looked only at Safe and Well-led.
The home had made improvements since the previous inspection. Medicines were being managed safely, recruitment checks had improved, risk assessments had been updated and staff understood safeguarding procedures. People said they felt safe, although there could be delays in getting help.
The home still needed to improve its laundry room, quality checks and record keeping. Communication with relatives had not always been reliable. The overall rating remained Requires Improvement. The other three question ratings were carried over from the previous comprehensive inspection because they were not inspected this time.
Medicines
Medicines were administered safely and records were completed accurately. Staff handling medicines had training and their competence was checked.
“Medicines were administered individually, and the medication administration records (MAR) was completed in full and accurately.” from the report
Updated risk plans
The home had updated care plans and risk assessments to reflect people's current needs, including falls, pressure sores and dietary requirements.
“Care plans provided clear guidance for staff to follow to manage those risks.” from the report
Infection control
The home had cleaning arrangements, PPE, hand sanitiser and regular COVID-19 testing. Staff were monitored and action was taken when PPE was not used correctly.
“There was a designated room and regular testing for staff, people using the service and visitors.” from the report
Safeguarding
Staff had safeguarding and whistleblowing training and knew how to report concerns. Information was also displayed in an accessible format.
“Information about safeguarding and whistle-blowing procedure was displayed in easy read and pictorial format so people could to understand how to raise concerns.” from the report
Supportive manager
People, relatives and staff spoke positively about the new manager. The manager had started an improvement plan and was addressing known problems.
“People using the service spoke positively about the manager.” from the report
Laundry room condition
seriousThe laundry room had exposed brickwork, flooring and ceiling cables. The manager had started arranging improvements, but the work was not complete.
“Improvements were needed to the laundry room to reduce the risk of cross infection as there was exposed brickwork, flooring and exposed ceiling cables.” from the report
Quality checks
needs fixingThe provider's audits had not reliably identified shortfalls. Records and checks needed further work so that they stayed accurate and up to date.
“The audits and monitoring of care plans, risk assessments and records required embedding and reviewing to ensure these were accurate and kept up to date.” from the report
Delays at busy times
needs fixingPeople and relatives said there could be delays in receiving support, especially at weekends. The report says nobody felt unsafe and staffing rotas showed the required numbers were usually on duty.
“Sometimes at the weekend I have to wait but they do come.” from the report
Communication with relatives
needs fixingSome relatives had not received updates consistently. There were also reports that calls were not always answered and that a fall had not been reported to a relative.
“Visiting appointments are difficult to make because no one answers the phones especially at the weekends.” from the report
Learning disability and autism support
needs fixingThe home could not yet fully demonstrate that it met all the relevant principles for people with a learning disability or autism. Further staff training and more personalised care planning were needed.
“The service was not fully able to demonstrate how they were meeting some of the underpinning principles of 'Right support, right care, right culture'.” from the report
- 01Has the laundry room refurbishment been completed, and how do you now prevent infection risks there?
- 02How do you check that care plans, risk assessments and other records remain accurate and up to date?
- 03What staffing arrangements are in place at weekends, and how do you prevent delays when people need help?
- 04How are relatives informed about falls, incidents and changes in their family member's care?
- 05What extra training do staff have to support people with learning disabilities or autism?
This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led, including infection control; the other three ratings were carried over from the previous comprehensive inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 10 August 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Linford Grange
4 rated inspections over 6 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.
- July 2023Goodcurrent ratingup from Requires improvementSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- August 2021Requires improvementstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- November 2019Requires improvementdown from GoodSafe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- May 2017GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- May 2016
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 5 May 2016.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.
Weigh the report against the rest
Fees, photos and reviews from families
How to read CQC ratings and reports
What to check when you visit
At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Milton Keynes
These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.
Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 90 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.
“We can all fully relax around Nyarai and she feels like part of our family, which is no mean feat!”
“She was v competent and confident and we felt our mum was safe in her care. She supported us through a difficult time.”
Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.