Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Levina House

Goodpublished 7 March 2018, 8 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors were assured that the home used PPE safely, supported testing, managed infection risks and followed visiting guidance. They were also told that measures were in place to reduce the effect of COVID-19-related staffing pressures.
Effective?
Good
Does the care work? Training, consent, food and drink, working with GPs and nurses.
Caring?
Good
Are people treated with kindness and dignity?
Responsive?
Good
Is care built around the person? Care plans, activities, complaints.
Well-led?
Good
Is the home run well? The manager, the culture, how problems get found and fixed.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, January 2022

Inspected but not rated; inspectors found good infection control and visiting arrangements during the pandemic.

The home supports up to six people with learning disabilities. Six people were living there when inspectors visited on 14 January 2022.

This was a targeted, announced inspection with just under 24 hours’ notice. Inspectors looked at infection prevention and control, visiting arrangements and staffing pressures linked to COVID-19.

Inspectors were assured that the home used PPE safely, supported testing, managed possible outbreaks and followed current visiting guidance. Staff helped people understand the pandemic and made social contact possible where this could be done safely.

The home was inspected but not rated. This report does not give an overall rating or ratings for the other areas of care.

What inspectors praised
  • Support with PPE

    Staff explained the pandemic and found creative ways to help people feel comfortable using PPE. Some people began using PPE themselves.

    “Staff had found creative ways to make people feel comfortable with the use of personal protective equipment (PPE).” from the report
  • Safe social contact

    The home maintained social distancing where possible and found ways for people to spend time together safely.

    “Where possible, social distancing was maintained and the staff team had found innovative ways of making sure people could spend time with each other in a safe way.” from the report
  • Consistent staff team

    Management supported staff wellbeing, which helped the home retain staff during the pandemic.

    “The management team had supported the wellbeing of staff. This had led to good staff retention over the pandemic” from the report
  • Infection control

    Inspectors were assured that the home had suitable arrangements for PPE, testing, hygiene, visiting and managing outbreaks.

    “We were assured that the provider's infection prevention and control policy was up to date.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are COVID-19 or other infection control arrangements being managed now?
  2. 02How do you help people who find PPE uncomfortable or difficult to understand?
  3. 03What happens when a resident or staff member tests positive for an infection?
  4. 04How are visits arranged, and what would happen if infection risks increased?
  5. 05How do you manage staffing pressures and maintain a consistent staff team?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control, visiting arrangements and COVID-19-related staffing pressures; it did not rate the service or assess the other care areas. This explanation was written from the published report of 28 January 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2018

Levina House was rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with improvements since the previous inspection.

The inspection was unannounced and took place on 24 January 2018. One inspector spoke with four people living at the home, observed people and staff, and spoke with managers and care staff. They reviewed three care plans, medicines records, incident records, meeting minutes, audits and safety checks.

Inspectors found enough staff, safe recruitment, suitable medicines arrangements and systems to protect people from abuse and harm. Staff supported people to stay healthy, make choices and access work, healthcare, activities and the community. People were treated with kindness, dignity and respect.

The home was rated Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. The previous inspection had also rated it Good. The report says earlier concerns about responding to feedback and keeping care plans up to date had improved, and it found no serious risks or concerns.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe staffing

    Inspectors found enough staff to support people safely and observed staff helping people with shopping and family visits. Recruitment checks were also in place.

    “There were enough staff to ensure that people's needs were met safely.” from the report
  • Kind relationships

    People described staff as kind and supportive. Inspectors saw staff treating people with respect and adapting their communication to their needs.

    “People had caring, kind supportive relationships with the staff who supported them.” from the report
  • Active lives

    People were supported to go out, work, take holidays, meet relatives and join activities such as discos, craft sessions and meals out.

    “People had busy, active lives. Some people were able to choose to go out independently and plan their own time.” from the report
  • Improvements made

    The home had acted on the previous inspection's concerns about feedback and care plans. Inspectors found care plans were now regularly reviewed and up to date.

    “At this inspection we found that this had improved.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are risk assessments updated when a person's behaviour, needs or usual routines change?
  2. 02How do you decide whether to give as-required medicines to help someone calm, and how do you record the other steps tried first?
  3. 03Can you show how people's views from the weekly Speak Up meetings have changed the home or their care?
  4. 04What activities, work opportunities and support to go out are available to people now?
  5. 05What arrangements are in place if someone needs end of life care, given that this was not inspected in the report?

This was an unannounced inspection of all five quality areas, but end of life care was not inspected because nobody was receiving it at the time. This explanation was written from the published report of 7 March 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Levina House

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. January 2022Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Levina House →

  2. March 2018Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Levina House →

  3. December 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. December 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. February 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. November 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. July 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 4 July 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

90 live-in carers within about an hour of Nottingham

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,270 a week. 73 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

See live-in carers near NottinghamProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.