Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Lennox Lodge

Goodpublished 22 October 2019, 6 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors were assured about infection prevention and control, including PPE, testing, cleaning, visiting, admissions and outbreak management.
Effective?
Good
This area was not assessed or rated in this targeted inspection.
Caring?
Good
This area was not assessed or rated in this targeted inspection.
Responsive?
Good
This area was not assessed or rated in this targeted inspection.
Well-led?
Good
This area was not assessed or rated in this targeted inspection.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2021

Inspected but not rated; inspectors were assured about infection prevention and control during a COVID-19 outbreak.

This was an announced, targeted inspection on 25 February 2021. Inspectors checked infection prevention and control arrangements after a COVID-19 outbreak affecting three people.

Inspectors were assured that the home was managing visitors, admissions, testing, PPE, social distancing and cleaning safely. People who tested positive were supported to isolate, and zoning was used to keep affected areas separate.

The home was inspected but not rated. This report does not give an overall rating or ratings for the other areas of care.

What inspectors praised
  • Separate areas during the outbreak

    The home used zoning and separate dining areas to reduce contact between people in different parts of the building.

    “The registered manager had successfully implemented zoning at the home which had enabled those who tested positive for the virus to be looked after on a self-contained floor of the home.” from the report
  • PPE arrangements

    Staff were seen using PPE properly. There were dedicated areas for changing and several stations for disposing of used equipment.

    “We saw staff wearing personal protective equipment (PPE) appropriately.” from the report
  • Extra support for people

    Extra staff were used so people, including those living with dementia, could receive more one-to-one reassurance and help with activities.

    “To help reassure and support people the registered manager had over staffed the home for every shift.” from the report
  • Cleaning and ventilation

    Inspectors found the home clean. Daily cleaning covered frequently touched and high areas, and windows were kept open where possible.

    “The home was clean and some ornaments had been removed to minimise cleaning areas.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are the zoning and separate dining arrangements used if there is another infection outbreak?
  2. 02How often are staff trained and checked on PPE and infection control procedures?
  3. 03How does the home support residents with dementia if visiting is restricted?
  4. 04How are cleaning duties and frequently touched areas monitored across every shift?
  5. 05What are the current visiting arrangements?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control practices only; the service was inspected but not rated and the other care areas were not assessed. This explanation was written from the published report of 10 March 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, October 2019

Lennox Lodge was rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and person-centred care across all five areas.

This was an unannounced inspection on 17 and 19 September 2019. One inspector spoke with six people, four relatives and 11 staff, and also spoke with two visiting professionals after the inspection. Records, medicines, care plans, staff files, complaints and quality checks were reviewed.

Inspectors found that people were protected from abuse, risks were assessed and medicines were managed safely. Staffing levels, recruitment checks, staff training and fire safety arrangements were also found to be suitable. People received support with food, health appointments and decisions about their care.

People described staff as kind and respectful. Care plans reflected people's needs, interests and preferences. There were activities, trips out and support for people who preferred individual time. The home had systems for handling complaints, learning from incidents and checking the quality of care.

The home was rated Good in Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. This was the same overall rating and the same rating in each area as at the previous inspection, published on 30 December 2016.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and respectful staff

    Staff knew people well and supported their dignity, privacy, choices and independence. Relatives and professionals also spoke positively about the staff.

    “People were treated with dignity and respect and staff were kind to people.” from the report
  • Personalised support and activities

    Care plans included people's histories, interests, likes and dislikes. People could join activities, spend time individually with staff, go into the garden or go on outings.

    “People were supported to go out on local visits and to use the garden.” from the report
  • Learning from incidents

    The home reviewed falls and identified that more happened around supper time. It added a part-time staff member for that period, and later audits showed falls had reduced then.

    “Subsequent falls audits showed that falls had decreased around supper time.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How will you make sure medicines that are refused or given late are followed up and recorded on the computer system?
  2. 02What activities and one-to-one support would be available for my relative, including if they preferred not to join group activities?
  3. 03How often would my relative's care plan and risk assessments be reviewed, and how would we be involved?
  4. 04How would you support my relative if their needs changed and they needed nursing care?
  5. 05What dementia, diabetes and end of life training have staff completed recently?

This was an unannounced planned inspection covering all five CQC key questions, with both the accommodation and care reviewed; all five ratings carried over as Good from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 22 October 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Lennox Lodge

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. March 2021Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Lennox Lodge →

  2. October 2019Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Lennox Lodge →

  3. December 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. June 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. November 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. March 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. May 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. December 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 23 December 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

19 live-in carers within about an hour of East Sussex

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,000 to £1,400 a week. 13 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“When he point blank refused to go into hospital for a life saving blood transfusion she talked him through the situation and agreed to go in the ambulance with him and stayed until he was settled.”
Clare S., about Mihaela B.
“Una felt safe, secure and loved in her time with Debbie which is a gift that I am eternally grateful for.”
Tisana S., about Debra S.
See live-in carers near East SussexProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.