Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Lavender Hills Care Home

Goodpublished 30 May 2019, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors were assured that infection risks were being managed, including PPE, testing, cleaning, safe admissions, visiting and outbreak planning. They also found enough staff and confirmed that vaccination requirements were being met.
Effective?
Good
Does the care work? Training, consent, food and drink, working with GPs and nurses.
Caring?
Good
Are people treated with kindness and dignity?
Responsive?
Good
Is care built around the person? Care plans, activities, complaints.
Well-led?
Good
Is the home run well? The manager, the culture, how problems get found and fixed.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2022

Lavender Hills Care Home was inspected but not rated; inspectors found good infection control and enough staff during the COVID-19 review.

The inspection took place on 28 January 2022. It was announced one day beforehand and focused on infection prevention and control during the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as staffing pressures.

Inspectors found up-to-date COVID-19 policies, testing for people, staff and visitors, safe visiting arrangements, enough personal protective equipment and appropriate use of it. The home was clean and tidy, and staff had infection control training.

The home had enough staff at the time of the inspection. Inspectors were assured that people were admitted safely, infections were being managed, and required non-exempt staff and visiting professionals were vaccinated.

This inspection did not give a rating. 'Inspected but not rated' means the report records what inspectors checked, but it is not an overall judgement of the home's quality or a new rating for all five areas.

What inspectors praised
  • Up-to-date pandemic planning

    The home had policies, guidance, contingency plans and risk assessments for managing COVID-19. These had been updated as guidance changed.

    “A range of policies and guidance was available to manage the COVID-19 pandemic.” from the report
  • Effective infection control

    Inspectors found suitable PPE, staff using it correctly, infection control training and checks on handwashing and PPE procedures.

    “Staff were observed wearing PPE appropriately at all times during the inspection.” from the report
  • Safe visiting arrangements

    Visits were taking place in line with the guidance, including arrangements for essential care givers, people at the end of life and screened pod visits.

    “Visits for people who used the service were taking place in line with the current guidance.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are your COVID-19 contingency plans and infection control policies being kept up to date now?
  2. 02What testing arrangements are currently in place for residents, staff and visitors?
  3. 03How do you make sure there are enough staff if there is an outbreak or staff absence?
  4. 04What visiting arrangements are currently available, including for essential care givers and people at the end of life?
  5. 05How do you check that staff are using PPE and washing their hands correctly?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control and COVID-19-related staffing pressures; it was not a full inspection and the service was not rated. This explanation was written from the published report of 24 February 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, April 2021

Inspected but not rated; inspectors found good infection control and visiting arrangements during the targeted COVID-19 check.

Inspectors visited on 9 March 2021. This was an announced, targeted inspection during the coronavirus pandemic. It looked at infection prevention and control measures, rather than the full range of care quality.

Inspectors were assured that infection risks were being managed. This included visitor arrangements, use of personal protective equipment, testing, social distancing, safe admissions, cleaning and outbreak planning.

The home had updated visiting procedures, supplies of lateral flow tests for nominated visitors and a separate visiting area. Staff had regular pandemic training and worked with local infection control nurses.

The service was inspected but not rated. This means the report does not give an overall quality rating or full ratings for the five areas of care.

What inspectors praised
  • Visiting arrangements

    The home had clear visiting procedures, a separate area for putting on and removing protective equipment, and a good supply of protective equipment.

    “The provider had a clear visiting policy and procedures in place in relation to relatives and friends, staff and visiting professionals.” from the report
  • Staff preparation

    Staff received regular training about the pandemic and protective equipment. The home also worked with local infection control nurses.

    “Staff had received regular training about the pandemic and use of PPE.” from the report
  • Information for residents

    The home provided information in an easy-read format to help residents understand the pandemic and protective equipment.

    “Easy read information about the pandemic and use of PPE had been provided for people living in the home.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What infection prevention and control measures are in place now, and how have they changed since the inspection on 9 March 2021?
  2. 02What are the current arrangements for family visits, including testing and protective equipment?
  3. 03How do you manage admissions and possible infection outbreaks?
  4. 04How do you make sure staff receive regular training on infection prevention and protective equipment?
  5. 05Can you provide the home's latest full inspection rating and report?

This was an announced targeted inspection of infection prevention and control during the coronavirus pandemic; the service was inspected but not rated and the other care areas were not assessed. This explanation was written from the published report of 8 April 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Lavender Hills Care Home

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. February 2022Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Lavender Hills Care Home →

  2. April 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Lavender Hills Care Home →

  3. May 2019Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. October 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. August 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. January 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. November 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. October 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. August 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. May 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  11. February 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  12. November 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  13. September 2012

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 19 September 2012.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

85 live-in carers within about an hour of Lancashire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 78 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“She understands the needs of an elderly person in the early stages of dementia and has treated my mother with great kindness and skill.”
Simon W., about Ncebakazi V.
“Thanks to Tracy, Dad was always immaculately dressed and clean, his meals were all home cooked and nutritionally well balanced and his home was always kept really clean and tidy.”
Jackie S., about Tracy O.
See live-in carers near LancashireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.