Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Lansdowne Hill Care Home

Goodpublished 28 February 2025, 19 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, May 2018

Rated Outstanding; inspectors found exceptionally kind, well-led care, with one falls risk assessment not clearly recorded.

Inspectors made an unannounced visit on 20 March 2018. They spoke with people living there, relatives, staff and an external professional. They observed care and checked care plans, staff files, medicine records and management records.

People were found to be safe and supported by enough staff. Medicines were managed safely. Staff had suitable training, people received help with food and healthcare, and care plans reflected people's needs and preferences.

The strongest findings were about kindness and leadership. Staff respected people's dignity, supported family relationships and provided emotional support. The management team was described as open, effective and focused on improving people's quality of life.

The overall rating was Outstanding. Safe, Effective and Responsive were rated Good, while Caring and Well-led were rated Outstanding. The home had improved from Good at the previous inspection.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and respectful care

    Staff consistently treated people with warmth, patience and dignity. Inspectors saw care that went beyond what they normally expect to see.

    “We found that staff cared for people in ways that exceeded expectations with staff often going extra mile.” from the report
  • Strong emotional support

    Staff used their knowledge of people's lives and preferences to support their emotional wellbeing. They found individual ways to help people feel calmer and more connected.

    “This meant staff effectively used information about people to provide them with compassionate approach that increased their emotional well-being?” from the report
  • Family involvement

    Relatives were welcomed and encouraged to stay involved in people's lives. There were no restrictions on visiting times.

    “There were no restrictions on when people could visit their relatives.” from the report
  • Effective leadership

    The management team was trusted by people, relatives and outside professionals. Staff were encouraged to raise concerns and suggest improvements.

    “The provider and management demonstrated they looked for initiatives to improve the service delivery and improve people's quality of life and experiences.” from the report
  • Safe staffing and medicines

    Inspectors found enough staff to respond promptly to people's needs. Medicine records were accurate and staff administering medicines had their competence checked.

    “Staffing levels ensured people received timely care.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Falls information was not clearly recorded

    needs fixing

    One person known to be at risk of falls did not have a separate falls risk assessment. Inspectors found the information elsewhere and said the risks were being managed safely, but the management team agreed to review how it was recorded.

    “We saw that one person was known to be at risk of falls, but there was no falls risk assessment in place.” from the report
  • Low survey response

    minor

    The 2017 feedback survey received few responses. The manager had acted on the points raised and encouraged people to give feedback in other ways.

    “The 2017 survey had a low response rate but we saw the registered manager had fed back on points raised” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How do you now record and review falls risks for each person?
  2. 02What changes were made after the medicine error mentioned in the report, and how are staff checked on these procedures?
  3. 03How do you make sure there are enough staff at different times of day and night?
  4. 04How would you involve our family member and us in decisions if they could not make a decision themselves?
  5. 05How are people's end of life wishes recorded and updated if their needs change?

This was an unannounced inspection of the whole service, including accommodation and care, and inspectors considered all five quality areas. This explanation was written from the published report of 23 May 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Lansdowne Hill Care Home

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has improved, from Good to Outstanding.

  1. May 2018Outstandingcurrent ratingup from Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: OutstandingResponsive: GoodWell-led: Outstanding

    Read what inspectors found at Lansdowne Hill Care Home →

  2. April 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. May 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. December 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. August 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. March 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. May 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. November 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. October 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 10 October 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

44 live-in carers within about an hour of Swindon

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £990 to £1,280 a week. 34 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“Linet became her carer and all changed, my daughter started eating, taking her medications and more important her happiness came back.”
Lita R., about Linet Wanjiku M.
“She was very caring, kind and patient to all his needs, she built up a wondetful rapport with him, she was dedicated and was there for him through good times as well as through the tough times”
Katrina O., about Sekai M.
See live-in carers near SwindonProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.