Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Jubilee Mews

Goodpublished 8 April 2026, 6 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2022

Jubilee Mews was inspected but not rated; inspectors found strong COVID-19 infection control and safe visiting arrangements.

This was an announced, targeted inspection on 23 February 2022. Inspectors looked mainly at infection prevention and control, visiting arrangements and whether COVID-19 staffing pressures affected care.

The home had regularly updated COVID-19 policies, risk assessments, testing, visitor checks, personal protective equipment and increased cleaning. Inspectors said staff were using protective equipment correctly and that visitors and residents could meet safely.

The home was inspected but not rated. This means the inspection did not give an overall quality rating or a full rating for all five areas of care.

What inspectors praised
  • COVID-19 risk management

    The home had policies and risk assessments for COVID-19, and these were updated when national guidance changed.

    “The registered manager had identified, assessed and mitigated COVID-19 related risks to people, staff and visitors.” from the report
  • Protective equipment and hygiene

    There was enough protective equipment and hand sanitiser. Inspectors saw staff using protective equipment correctly and found increased cleaning schedules.

    “There was an ample supply of PPE for staff and visitors to use.” from the report
  • Contact with relatives

    The home supported people to keep in touch with relatives through an outdoor visiting area and indoor visits as restrictions eased.

    “People living in the home and their relatives were supported to maintain contact.” from the report
  • Safe visits and community access

    Visitors and professionals were screened, and people could leave the home to see relatives or use the local community.

    “Relatives and external professionals were supported to visit the service safely in line with government guidance.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What infection prevention and control arrangements are in place now, and how often are the policies reviewed?
  2. 02How are visitors currently screened, and what visiting arrangements are available for relatives?
  3. 03How often are residents and staff tested when there is an infection risk?
  4. 04How many staff are currently working on each shift, and how does the home manage staffing pressures?
  5. 05How are residents supported to leave the home and maintain contact with relatives?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control, visiting arrangements and COVID-19-related staffing pressures; the service was inspected but not rated. This explanation was written from the published report of 4 March 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, July 2018

Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with end-of-life wishes still needing to be recorded.

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection on 22 June 2018. One inspector visited, spoke with people, staff and a visiting health professional, observed the service and checked care, medicines, staffing and management records.

The home supported 11 people, with space for up to 12. Inspectors found that people felt safe, staff were properly checked and trained, medicines were managed safely and risks were reviewed. People received help with healthcare, food, daily living skills, hobbies and community activities.

People described staff as kind, respectful and approachable. Care plans were personal and up to date, and people were involved in decisions about their lives. The home had effective complaints and quality-checking systems.

The overall rating was Good, with Good ratings for Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. The rating was unchanged from the previous inspection in March 2016. Inspectors noted one area to address: people's end-of-life wishes had not been recorded.

What inspectors praised
  • People felt safe

    People said they felt safe living in the home and with the staff supporting them. Staff understood how to respond to safeguarding concerns.

    “Everyone we spoke with said that they felt very safe living at Jubilee Mews and they felt safe with the staff who supported them.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Staff built positive relationships with people and supported their choices, privacy and dignity. People were involved in decisions about their daily lives.

    “Positive, caring relationships had been developed with people.” from the report
  • Support for independence

    The home helped people build everyday skills such as cooking, laundry and budgeting. People were also supported to follow interests and take part in community life.

    “Rehabilitative work was done with people, supported by staff following support plans such as for laundry, cooking, budgeting and other skills to help people prepare for living independently.” from the report
  • Strong staff support and leadership

    Staff were described as experienced and knowledgeable. Staff had access to training, supervision and support from the management team.

    “The registered manager was supported by a staff that was longstanding, experienced, knowledgeable and familiar with the needs of the people they supported.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • End-of-life wishes not recorded

    needs fixing

    The home did not have information about people's end-of-life wishes to guide staff. The registered manager said this would be addressed.

    “Information was not available about people's end of life wishes to inform staff of people's wishes at this important time.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How will you record and regularly review my relative's end-of-life wishes?
  2. 02How would you support my relative to build or maintain everyday skills such as cooking, laundry and budgeting?
  3. 03How would you involve my relative in choosing activities, hobbies and community opportunities?
  4. 04How are staffing levels adjusted if people's needs change?
  5. 05How would my relative's healthcare appointments and advice from professionals be managed?

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering all five rating areas, and the report says the overall rating remained Good from March 2016. This explanation was written from the published report of 10 July 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Jubilee Mews

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. March 2022Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Jubilee Mews →

  2. July 2018Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Jubilee Mews →

  3. May 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. July 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. January 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. June 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. May 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 10 May 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

36 live-in carers within about an hour of Newcastle upon Tyne

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £950 to £1,160 a week. 30 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“Petty introduced herself to Mum every time she was caring for her and responded very quickly to Mum if she was distressed in the night.”
Judith W., about Petty Tutsirai C.
See live-in carers near Newcastle upon TyneProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.