CQC report explained · a nursing home
What the CQC found at Jason Hylton Court
Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.
What inspectors found, January 2018
Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and responsive care, with no breaches reported.
Inspectors made an unannounced, comprehensive visit on 5 January 2018. They spoke with people living in the home, relatives and staff. They observed care and checked care records, staff recruitment, training and quality checks.
The home was rated Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, safe medicines practices, suitable risk assessments and appropriate infection control. People received support that matched their needs and preferences.
The previous inspection in December 2015 also found the service Good. The home remained Good at this inspection. The report did not identify any breaches of regulations or enforcement action.
Safe staffing and risk management
Inspectors found sufficient staff with different skills. Risks such as falls were assessed, and equipment and emergency plans were in place.
“There was sufficient staff with varying levels of skills available to support people.” from the report
Kind and respectful care
Staff knew people well and supported their privacy, dignity and independence. People were also helped to maintain important relationships.
“We observed a positive and caring relationship between people and the staff.” from the report
Care matched people's needs
Care plans reflected people's needs and preferences. Staff followed professional guidance, including for people at risk of choking, and helped people access healthcare.
“Information in people's care plans reflected the support they told us they needed and the support we observed on the day of the inspection.” from the report
Activities and choice
People could choose whether to join activities and were supported to stay active, maintain interests and take part in community life.
“Throughout the day people were supported to be actively involved in activities of their choice.” from the report
Open management
People, relatives and staff were asked for their views. The management team used audits, meetings and feedback to monitor the service.
“A positive culture was in place that promoted good outcomes for people.” from the report
Website update
minorThe provider's website was being updated and its home page was not available during the inspection. The report says the current rating would be displayed when the page was updated.
“The provider's website was in the process of being update and the home page was not available.” from the report
- 01How will you assess and review my relative's individual risks, including the risk of falls?
- 02How will you make sure my relative's medicines are given safely and reviewed when needed?
- 03What activities and community opportunities would suit my relative's interests and abilities?
- 04How will you involve me and my relative in care planning and reviews?
- 05How would you support my relative's healthcare and end of life wishes?
This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering all five CQC questions, and the home and care provided were both looked at. This explanation was written from the published report of 23 January 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Jason Hylton Court
3 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.
- January 2018Goodcurrent ratingstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- January 2016Goodup from Requires improvementSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- March 2015Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- September 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- July 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- September 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- September 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- May 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- October 2011
Report published without a new overall rating.
- March 2011
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 15 March 2011.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.
Weigh the report against the rest
Fees, photos and reviews from families
How to read CQC ratings and reports
What to check when you visit
62 live-in carers within about an hour of Derbyshire
These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.
Most charge £1,010 to £1,260 a week. 51 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.
“Ernest is an amazing professional carer who delivers care from the heart.”
“We particularly appreciate the companionship Dawn gives in the evenings when she plays cards and Scrabble with my mother.”
Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.