Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Jasna Gora Residential Care Home

Goodpublished 31 May 2019, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors were assured that infection risks were managed through safe visiting, testing, personal protective equipment, hygiene, social distancing and outbreak procedures.
Effective?
Good
This question was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
Caring?
Good
This question was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
Responsive?
Good
This question was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
Well-led?
Good
This question was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2022

Jasna Gora Residential Care Home was inspected but not rated; inspectors found strong infection control and support for people's wellbeing.

Inspectors visited on 17 February 2022. The visit was announced 24 hours beforehand and was a targeted inspection during the COVID-19 pandemic.

They looked mainly at infection prevention and control. They also asked about staffing pressures and whether these affected care.

Inspectors found the home clean and well maintained. They were assured that the home used personal protective equipment safely, supported safe visiting, managed outbreaks and kept its infection control policy up to date.

The service was inspected but not rated. This means the report does not give an overall quality rating or ratings for most of the five questions.

What inspectors praised
  • Infection control

    The home had clear arrangements for visitors and strong hygiene practices. Inspectors found good oversight of infection prevention.

    “There was very good oversight of the rigorous practices in the home used to prevent the spread of infection.” from the report
  • Clean environment

    The home was clean and well maintained, with established arrangements to promote hygiene.

    “The home was clean and well maintained with robust regimes in place to promote good hygiene practices.” from the report
  • Safe visiting

    The home used separate entrances for different types of visitors and had procedures to reduce infection risks.

    “There were clear procedures for ensuring visitors to the home supported good infection prevention and control practice, with separate entrances used for different types of visitors.” from the report
  • Emotional wellbeing

    Inspectors found that people's social and emotional needs were supported during the pandemic.

    “People's social, emotional and psychological well-being was supported so they did not feel socially isolated during the COVID-19 pandemic.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are staffing pressures being managed now, and have they affected people's care?
  2. 02How are visits arranged, including the use of separate entrances and infection control measures?
  3. 03How often are infection prevention and control practices checked?
  4. 04How does the home support people's social and emotional wellbeing when visits or activities are restricted?
  5. 05When was the infection prevention and control policy last reviewed?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control, with questions about staffing pressures; the service was inspected but not rated overall. This explanation was written from the published report of 26 March 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, May 2019

Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with a small window safety issue fixed immediately.

This was an unannounced planned inspection on 23 April 2019. Two inspectors visited with a Polish interpreter. They spoke with seven people, one relative and staff, and checked care records, medicines, recruitment records and quality checks.

All five areas were rated Good: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. People said they felt safe and were happy living in the home. Inspectors found enough staff, safe medicines management, good infection control and safe recruitment.

Inspectors found kind relationships, personalised care and support for people's choices, health, meals and activities. The home was clean and well maintained. A few small first-floor windows did not have restrictors, but the home acted immediately when this was raised.

What inspectors praised
  • Enough staff

    Inspectors found staffing levels were sufficient to meet people's needs promptly and keep them safe.

    “There were enough staff to meet people's needs quickly and keep them safe.” from the report
  • Kind relationships

    People were treated with kindness and respect. Staff understood people's histories, preferences and what mattered to them.

    “People received care from staff who developed positive, caring and compassionate relationships with them.” from the report
  • Personalised care

    Care plans gave staff detailed guidance about people's routines, wellbeing and specific support needs.

    “Care plans were person centred, up to date and reviewed regularly.” from the report
  • Strong oversight

    The home regularly checked the quality and safety of care, investigated incidents and tracked improvement work.

    “There was an effective system in place to check on the quality and safety of the service.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Window restrictors

    minor

    Some small windows on the first floor did not have restrictors when inspectors visited. The deputy manager took immediate action to put this right.

    “some small windows on the first floor did not have window restrictors in place.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Who is currently managing the home while the registered manager is on extended leave?
  2. 02How will you assess and support my relative's needs before they move in?
  3. 03What personal care can you provide, and what support would require involvement from outside health professionals?
  4. 04How will you support my relative's language, cultural and religious preferences?
  5. 05What activities and daily routines would be available for my relative?

This was an unannounced planned inspection covering all five CQC areas, with care and the premises both included; the previous inspection in 2016 was also rated Good. This explanation was written from the published report of 31 May 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Jasna Gora Residential Care Home

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. March 2022Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Jasna Gora Residential Care Home →

  2. May 2019Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Jasna Gora Residential Care Home →

  3. October 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. September 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. December 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. October 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 20 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Kirklees

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 86 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“Carla has been a god send with the implementation of bringing mum back home from respite care.”
Claire A., about Carla M.
“Primrose is a very kind and compassionate healthcare professional”
Marion L., about Primrose N.
See live-in carers near KirkleesProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.