Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Jackman's Lodge

Goodpublished 30 August 2019, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, August 2019

Rated Good; inspectors found kind, personalised care, safe systems and strong management, although agency staff worked most shifts.

This was an unannounced, planned inspection on 24 July 2019. Two inspectors spoke with people living at the home, relatives and staff. They reviewed care records, medicines, recruitment files, accident records, complaints and quality checks.

The home was rated Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found that people felt safe, received care based on their individual needs and were treated with kindness, dignity and respect.

Care plans were detailed and regularly reviewed. Staff supported people's health, nutrition, activities, communication and personal choices. Medicines, infection control, staffing checks and safeguarding systems were found to be working safely.

The home had previously been rated Good at the inspection published on 16 March 2017. This inspection found that the Good rating had been maintained. No legal breaches were identified.

What inspectors praised
  • Personalised care

    Care plans reflected people's needs, preferences, histories and interests. People and their families were involved in planning and reviewing care.

    “People's care was designed and planned to meet their individual needs.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful staff

    People and relatives described staff as kind and respectful. Inspectors saw staff offering choices and protecting people's dignity and privacy.

    “People were supported and treated with dignity and respect and involved as partners in their care.” from the report
  • Safe medicines

    Medicines were stored, administered and recorded safely. Staff were trained and their practice was checked before they were assessed as competent.

    “Medicines were managed safely.” from the report
  • Strong management

    The management team monitored key areas, listened to feedback and reviewed incidents and complaints to support improvements.

    “There were effective systems of quality monitoring, which ensured that people received well-planned and managed care.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Reliance on agency staff

    minor

    Permanent staff vacancies meant agency staff worked most shifts. The report says the effect was reduced because the agency supplied staff who worked at the home regularly.

    “Vacancies on the permanent staff team at the time of our inspection meant that agency staff were deployed on most shifts.” from the report
  • Activities coordinator vacancy

    minor

    The activities coordinator post was vacant during the inspection. People still had access to activities, events and outings, and the provider was recruiting.

    “The provider was recruiting to the vacant activities co-ordinator post at the time of our inspection.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How many permanent staff vacancies are there now, and how often are agency staff used?
  2. 02How do you make sure agency staff know each person's care plan, needs and preferences?
  3. 03Has the activities coordinator post been filled, and what activities and outings are currently available?
  4. 04How are medicines checked and audited now?
  5. 05How will you involve our relative and family in reviewing the care plan?

This was an unannounced, planned inspection of the whole service, covering all five CQC questions and both the care and premises provided by the home. This explanation was written from the published report of 30 August 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Jackman's Lodge

Each visit the CQC has published, newest first, back to the day the home was registered.

  1. August 2019Goodcurrent rating
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Jackman's Lodge →

  2. August 2018

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 1 August 2018.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

77 live-in carers within about an hour of Surrey

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,250 a week. 66 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“Without his support we wouldn't have been able to navigate bringing and keeping Dad at home.”
Emma P., about Aman A.
“Not only has she looked after him beautifully, she has also been great company for him with lively conversation, kindness and humour.”
Clare M., about Zion S.
See live-in carers near SurreyProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.