Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Holly Court

Goodpublished 24 June 2026, 3 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2021

Inspected but not rated; inspectors found strong infection control, clean surroundings and support for people's social contact.

This was an announced, targeted inspection on 18 March 2021. It looked at how the home was preventing and controlling Covid-19 infections.

Inspectors found suitable arrangements for visitors, testing, personal protective equipment, cleaning, social distancing and managing possible outbreaks. They were assured that people were admitted safely and that the infection control policy was up to date.

The home was clean and well maintained. Staff supported people's social and emotional wellbeing through video calls and a visiting plan. The service was inspected but not rated, so this report does not give a full overall quality rating.

What inspectors praised
  • Infection control

    Inspectors found systems to reduce the risk of visitors bringing infections into the home or spreading them.

    “We were assured that the provider was preventing visitors from catching and spreading infections.” from the report
  • PPE and testing

    Staff were following government PPE guidance, supplies were sufficient, and ongoing testing was in place for visitors, staff and residents.

    “A documented ongoing testing regime was in place for visitors, staff and people living in the home.” from the report
  • Clean environment

    The home was clean and well maintained, with regular and enhanced cleaning.

    “We observed the home to be clean and well maintained. All areas of the home were subject to regular and enhanced cleaning regimes.” from the report
  • Social contact

    Staff supported people's emotional wellbeing through alternative ways to keep in touch, including video calls.

    “Alternative forms of maintaining social contact were in place including regular video calls.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How has the visiting plan changed since the inspection in March 2021?
  2. 02What testing arrangements are currently in place for visitors, staff and people living in the home?
  3. 03How do you manage a suspected or confirmed infection outbreak?
  4. 04How do you support residents to maintain social contact when visits are restricted?
  5. 05What are the home's current ratings for the areas this targeted inspection did not cover?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control during the coronavirus pandemic; it was not a full inspection and the service was inspected but not rated. This explanation was written from the published report of 30 March 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, June 2018

Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with some safety and activity shortfalls noted.

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection on 18 April 2018. Two inspectors observed care, spoke with relatives and staff, reviewed support records and recruitment files, and looked around the home.

The home supported 12 people with learning disabilities and complex health needs. Inspectors found good care in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Medicines were managed safely, staff were trained, people were treated with dignity, and care plans reflected people's needs and choices.

Inspectors identified some issues during the visit. These included safety points that were addressed immediately, a high fridge temperature in one kitchen, and limits on some activities because minibus drivers were not always available. The home remained rated Good, and the report says it met all relevant fundamental standards.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe medicines practice

    Staff received medicines training and their competence was checked. Inspectors found that people received medicines when they needed them.

    “People received their medicines when they needed them and the procedures for managing medicines safely were methodical and robust.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Care plans recorded what mattered to people and how they wanted to be supported. Staff encouraged independence through everyday activities.

    “People's care plans contained information on what was important to them to enable staff to deliver personalised care.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Inspectors saw staff explain what they were doing, involve people in their care and treat them with dignity.

    “We observed staff were caring throughout our inspection and involved people in their care by keeping them informed about what they were doing at all times when delivering care.” from the report
  • Visible management

    The manager was present in the home and staff said they felt supported and able to raise issues. Regular audits were used to monitor quality.

    “The registered manager was very visible in the service and was involved in how the home was run.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Safety points needed action

    needs fixing

    Inspectors found several observations where safety could have been compromised if people had been able to move around without assistance. The manager arranged for these points to be resolved immediately.

    “At the time of our inspection there was no one living at Holly Court who was independently mobile, however we made a number of observations where safety could have been compromised, if people had been able to mobilise themselves without assistance.” from the report
  • High fridge temperature

    minor

    The temperature of one kitchen fridge was high during the inspection. The issue was discussed with the manager and instructions were given for it to be resolved.

    “During the inspection we saw the fridge temperature in one kitchen was high; we saw this had been discussed with the manager and maintenance and instructions were given to resolve the issue.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What safety issues were identified during the inspection, and how were they resolved?
  2. 02How do you check and record fridge and other food storage temperatures now?
  3. 03How do you make sure people get the outings and activities in their support plans when minibus drivers are unavailable?
  4. 04How are people and relatives involved in reviewing care plans and choosing activities?
  5. 05How do you check that staff remain competent to give medicines safely?

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering all five CQC questions; the home remained Good overall and the Effective rating improved to Good. This explanation was written from the published report of 26 June 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Holly Court

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. March 2021Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Holly Court →

  2. June 2018Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Holly Court →

  3. December 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. July 2014

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 3 July 2014.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Kirklees

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 86 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“Carla has been a god send with the implementation of bringing mum back home from respite care.”
Claire A., about Carla M.
“Primrose is a very kind and compassionate healthcare professional”
Marion L., about Primrose N.
See live-in carers near KirkleesProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.