Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Hill House - Care Home with Nursing Physical Disabilities

Goodpublished 13 January 2023, 3 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, January 2023

Hill House is rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind care and better leadership, but there was no recognised tool for setting safe staffing levels.

This was an unannounced focused inspection on 21 and 23 November 2022. Inspectors looked only at Safe and Well-led, after concerns about staffing, health and safety, and nursing care. They spoke with people living there, relatives, staff and a visiting health professional, and checked care plans, medicines, recruitment and management records.

The home was rated Good for Safe. Inspectors found people were protected from abuse, risks were assessed, medicines were managed safely and infection controls were in place. There were enough staff to meet people's needs, although the home did not use a recognised tool to work out safe staffing levels.

The home was rated Good for Well-led. Inspectors found stronger leadership than at the previous inspection, when Well-led was rated Requires Improvement. The overall rating stayed Good. Ratings for the other questions were carried forward from the previous inspection because they were not examined during this visit.

What inspectors praised
  • People felt safe

    People said they felt safe and staff knew how to report concerns. Inspectors found suitable safeguarding systems and training.

    “People told us they felt safe with the support they received and could speak to the registered manager if they had a problem.” from the report
  • Safe medicines

    Inspectors found that medicines were managed safely, records were accurate and people received medicines as prescribed.

    “Medicines were safely managed. Accurate records were maintained.” from the report
  • Person-centred support

    Support plans were up to date and reflected people's needs, wishes and preferences. Assistive technology helped some people with independence and communication.

    “These were up to date and reflected the person's support needs, wishes and preferences.” from the report
  • Improved leadership

    The Well-led rating improved from Requires Improvement to Good. Managers used audits, meetings and feedback to oversee the service.

    “At this inspection the rating has changed to Good.” from the report
  • Positive relationships

    People, relatives and staff gave positive feedback about the care and support. Staff said they felt supported in their roles.

    “We received positive comments about the care people received.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • No recognised staffing tool

    needs fixing

    Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs, but the home did not use a recognised tool to determine safe staffing levels. The manager said this would be addressed.

    “There were enough staff on duty to meet people's needs, however there was no recognised tool used to determine safe staffing levels.” from the report
  • Visit booking system

    minor

    A relative described the visiting arrangements as strict and a resident felt the booking system was not necessary. The system was stopped during the inspection after current guidance was discussed.

    “We discussed the latest national guidance with the registered manager and the booking system was immediately stopped.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What recognised tool or process do you now use to determine safe staffing levels?
  2. 02How do you make sure there are enough suitably trained staff for people's nursing and learning disability support needs?
  3. 03What are the current arrangements for family visits, and can visits take place without unnecessary booking restrictions?
  4. 04What additional training was planned to give staff the skills to support people with a learning disability?
  5. 05How are people's support plans reviewed and changed when their wishes or needs change?

This was an unannounced focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the other ratings were carried forward from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 13 January 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, December 2019

Rated Good overall; inspectors found safe, kind and responsive care, but leadership and some care records still required improvement.

This was an unannounced inspection on 25 and 28 November 2019. Inspectors spoke with people living at the home, relatives, staff and a visiting professional. They also checked care records, medicines records, staff files and management records.

The home was rated Good for Safe, Effective, Caring and Responsive. People said they felt safe and were treated with dignity. Inspectors found medicines were given safely, staff supported people's health, and care was kind and respectful.

The home was rated Requires Improvement for Well-led. Staffing had not always been sufficient, agency staff were used heavily, and some care plans were out of date or contained conflicting information. The home had increased staffing and created an improvement plan during the inspection.

The overall rating improved from Requires Improvement at the previous inspection. The report says the provider was no longer in breach of regulations at this inspection. Two recommendations were made about religious needs and activities.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe medicines

    Medicines were managed, stored and given safely by trained staff. Inspectors checked a sample of stock and found it was correct.

    “Medicines were managed and administered safely and as prescribed by staff who were appropriately trained to do so.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Inspectors saw trusting relationships between staff and people. People said staff treated them with dignity and respected their privacy.

    “During the inspection we observed warm and caring interactions between staff and people using the service.” from the report
  • Good health support

    People had access to a range of health professionals. The home was adapted for people's physical needs.

    “People were supported to access a wide range of healthcare professionals to support their health and well-being.” from the report
  • People's choices

    Staff sought permission before providing care, and people were involved in decisions about their support. People could choose food and, where possible, maintain their independence.

    “People told us they were able to make choices about their care and support, including about the staff who would support them with personal care.” from the report
  • Improvement work

    The provider had created a detailed improvement plan and arranged support from its quality team to review care planning.

    “During the inspection, the quality business partner provided a detailed service improvement plan” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Staffing and agency use

    needs fixing

    People and staff said staffing levels had not always been enough. This sometimes meant longer waits for support and a heavy reliance on agency staff, although staffing had recently increased.

    “People said they sometimes had to wait for support longer than usual due to staffing shortages.” from the report
  • Care records not always current

    needs fixing

    Care plans were comprehensive but were not always up to date or consistent. The provider had arranged extra quality team support to address this.

    “Care plans were comprehensive however had not always been kept up to date or contained conflicting information.” from the report
  • Activities and religious needs

    minor

    Some people felt activities no longer suited their changing needs. One person felt their religious needs were not fully met, and inspectors recommended further review.

    “We recommend that the provider includes activities in their overall review of care plans.” from the report
  • Inconsistent leadership

    needs fixing

    Management changes had affected improvement work, and the manager was working without a deputy during recruitment. This led to a Requires Improvement rating for Well-led.

    “The service management and leadership was inconsistent.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How many permanent care and nursing staff are now in place, and how often are agency staff used?
  2. 02How do you check that agency staff know each person's routines, needs and preferences?
  3. 03How have you updated care plans so they do not contain conflicting or out-of-date information?
  4. 04What activities are now available for people whose needs have changed, including trips and outings?
  5. 05How do you make sure each person's religious and cultural needs are understood and met?

This was a planned inspection covering all five CQC questions, following the previous Requires Improvement rating. This explanation was written from the published report of 14 December 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Hill House - Care Home with Nursing Physical Disabilities

5 rated inspections over 7 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. January 2023Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Hill House - Care Home with Nursing Physical Disabilities →

  2. December 2019Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Hill House - Care Home with Nursing Physical Disabilities →

  3. December 2018Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. November 2017Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. July 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. August 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. October 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. July 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. February 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 12 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Cheshire East

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 88 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“She is an exemplary carer, she is knowledgable empathetic and very respectful in the home.”
Katrina R., about Camille F.
“He developed a close affinity with Terence, spending time talking with him before he retired to bed and looking after his needs during the night.”
John P., about Rodrigo Javier B.
See live-in carers near Cheshire EastProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.