Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Henning Hall

Goodpublished 2 May 2025, 17 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, April 2023

Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care across all five areas.

This was the home’s first inspection since it was registered under its current provider. It was unannounced and took place on 21 March, 28 March and 03 April 2023. One inspector spoke with people, relatives and staff, and reviewed care, medicines, staff and management records.

Inspectors found people were safe. Staffing and recruitment were suitable, medicines were managed safely, infection controls were in place and risks such as falls, poor nutrition and pressure sores were assessed. People received suitable food, health support and equipment.

Care was described as kind, respectful and tailored to individuals. Care plans included people’s health needs, preferences, histories and communication needs. The home had activities, a complaints process and systems for gathering views and checking the quality of care.

The home was rated Good overall and Good in Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. The previous provider’s rating was Requires Improvement, published on 26 June 2019, but this was the first inspection of the current registered service.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe staffing and medicines

    Inspectors found enough staff to meet people’s needs, robust recruitment and safe medicines management. People receiving one-to-one support received it in line with their assessed needs.

    “Staffing levels met people's needs and recruitment processes were robust.” from the report
  • Personalised care

    Care plans reflected people’s health and social needs, preferences, histories and communication requirements. They were kept up to date and reviewed regularly.

    “Care plans were personalised and included both the main health and social needs of people.” from the report
  • Kind and dignified support

    People were treated respectfully and supported in a gentle and patient way. Staff respected privacy and encouraged people to be as independent as possible.

    “Staff spent time with individuals and interacted with them in a gentle and patient manner.” from the report
  • Health and nutrition support

    People could access health services, including weekly visits from a local surgery. Food choices were available and the home monitored people at risk of malnutrition or dehydration.

    “Where people were at risk malnutrition or possible de-hydration; close observation of people's weight and fluid intake was undertaken” from the report
  • Management and quality checks

    The registered manager was present and understood people’s needs. Audits were used to identify and address actions needed to maintain care quality.

    “A number of audits were used to measure the quality of care provided at Henning Hall.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How will you assess and review my relative’s individual risks, including falls, poor nutrition, dehydration or pressure sores?
  2. 02How will you support my relative’s communication needs, including access to hearing aids, glasses or pictorial information if needed?
  3. 03How will you involve my relative and our family in care planning and decisions if my relative cannot make a particular decision?
  4. 04What activities would be suitable for my relative, and how often would they receive individual support with interests?
  5. 05How would you respond if we raised a complaint or noticed a change in my relative’s health or behaviour?

This was a planned, unannounced first inspection of the newly registered service and covered all five key questions, including infection prevention and control under Safe. This explanation was written from the published report of 28 April 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Henning Hall

7 rated inspections over 7 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

  1. April 2023Goodcurrent ratingup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Henning Hall →

  2. August 2019Requires improvementup from Inadequate
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
  3. December 2018Inadequatedown from Requires improvement
    Safe: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate
  4. November 2018Requires improvementup from Inadequate
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
  5. June 2018Inadequatestayed Inadequate
    Safe: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate
  6. March 2018Inadequatedown from Requires improvement
    Safe: InadequateEffective: InadequateCaring: InadequateResponsive: InadequateWell-led: Inadequate
  7. October 2016Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
  8. October 2019

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 3 October 2019.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Cheshire East

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 88 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“She is an exemplary carer, she is knowledgable empathetic and very respectful in the home.”
Katrina R., about Camille F.
“He developed a close affinity with Terence, spending time talking with him before he retired to bed and looking after his needs during the night.”
John P., about Rodrigo Javier B.
See live-in carers near Cheshire EastProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.