CQC report explained · a nursing home
What the CQC found at Heathland Court Care Home
Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.
What inspectors found, August 2023
Rated Good overall; inspectors found safer care and clear improvements, but well-led remains Requires Improvement and medicine-room temperature records needed fixing.
This was an unannounced focused inspection on 31 July 2023. Inspectors checked whether earlier problems with staffing, risk management and oversight had been put right. They spoke with people living in the home, relatives, staff and outside professionals, and reviewed care plans, staff records, medicines records and management checks.
The home had made enough progress to address the breaches found at the previous inspection. Staff were no longer working excessive hours without enough rest. Risk plans were more detailed, moving equipment was available, and management checks were being used more effectively. The safe rating improved from Requires Improvement to Good.
There were still concerns about leadership. The home had been without a CQC-registered manager for 16 months, after several management changes. Inspectors also found that daily room temperature checks for some medicine storage areas had not been completed and recorded accurately. The provider said this was corrected after the inspection.
The overall rating changed from Requires Improvement to Good. However, this inspection only assessed Safe and Well-led. The other key question ratings were carried forward from the previous inspection, and Well-led stayed at Requires Improvement.
Safer staffing
Staff were given enough time off after long shifts and were no longer working excessive consecutive hours. Inspectors found staffing levels were adequate during the visit.
“We were assured the risk of people receiving support from fatigued staff who had worked excessive hours without sufficient time off had now been mitigated.” from the report
Kind and individual care
Inspectors observed staff responding to people's needs and preferences in a respectful way. People and visitors also described staff as kind and friendly.
“We observed staff constantly attending to people's needs and wishes, making sure they were happy and comfortable.” from the report
Open management approach
People, relatives and staff said the new management team was approachable and accessible. The home gathered views through meetings, reviews and surveys.
“People living in the care home, their relatives and staff working there all spoke positively about how approachable, accessible, and supportive the new management team were.” from the report
No registered manager
needs fixingThe home had not had a registered manager for 16 months. A new acting manager had applied to register, but this had not yet been completed at the inspection.
“However, the care home had been without a registered manager for 16 months.” from the report
Management turnover
needs fixingInspectors heard concerns about repeated changes in managers and the effect this could have on stability and consistency.
“We've had 5 different managers in 5 years. We desperately need a stable management team to help us provide people with consistent, good quality care they deserve.” from the report
Medicine storage records
needs fixingDaily checks and accurate records of the temperature in all clinical rooms storing medicines had not been maintained. The provider said suitable checks were introduced after the inspection.
“However, the provider had failed to conduct daily checks and kept accurate records of the room temperature of all their clinical rooms where peoples prescribed medicines were stored.” from the report
- 01Has the acting manager's application to become registered with the CQC been approved, and who is currently legally responsible for the home?
- 02How will you maintain a stable management team after the recent turnover of managers?
- 03How are temperatures checked and recorded every day in all rooms where medicines are stored?
- 04How will you complete the move from paper care records to the electronic care planning system?
- 05What actions are included in the improvement plan requested by the CQC, and how will progress be shared with families?
This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the other key question ratings were carried forward from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 17 August 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
What inspectors found, October 2022
Heathland Court Care Home is rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found risks with staffing, repositioning, incident monitoring and management oversight.
This was an unannounced focused inspection on 22 September 2022. Inspectors looked at Safe and Well-led because concerns had been raised about staffing, records, moving and handling, tissue viability and the culture in the home. They spoke with people, a relative and staff, and checked care plans, medicines records, recruitment files and management records.
The home was not always safe. Inspectors found inconsistent repositioning for people at risk of pressure wounds, unsafe staffing arrangements, some delays in giving pain relief and gaps in recording and investigating incidents. They also found that management checks had failed to identify these problems.
The home was rated Requires Improvement overall, with Safe and Well-led also rated Requires Improvement. The previous overall rating was Good. The other key question ratings were not inspected during this visit and were carried forward from the last inspection.
Recruitment checks
The home had recruitment records showing applications, references, identity checks and DBS checks for the files reviewed.
“We reviewed staff recruitment files and found these contained a completed application form, satisfactory references, photographic identification and a Disclosure and Barring Services (DBS) check.” from the report
Safeguarding awareness
Inspectors found that people were protected from abuse and that staff understood how to raise safeguarding concerns.
“People were protected against the risk of abuse.” from the report
Medicines records
Although pain relief was not always given promptly, the medicines records checked were complete and stock balances were accurate.
“Medicine Administration Records (MARs) were completed accurately with no gaps or omissions. Stocks and balances were accurate.” from the report
Infection control
Inspectors were assured about the home's infection prevention arrangements, including PPE, admissions and responding to infection risks.
“We were assured that the provider was using PPE effectively and safely.” from the report
Pressure wound risk
seriousRepositioning records were inconsistent, and some people waited longer than healthcare professionals had advised. This put people at risk of pressure wounds.
“Records showed repositioning checks were inconsistent, with some people waiting longer than advised to be repositioned. This meant people were at risk of developing pressure wounds.” from the report
Staffing and fatigue
seriousSome staff worked a 12-hour night shift followed by a further six-hour shift. Inspectors said staffing levels were not always enough to keep people safe and meet their needs.
“During the inspection we reviewed the staff rota and identified there were occasions whereby night staff had worked a 12 hour shift and were then rostered to work the morning shift for an additional six hours.” from the report
Incident recording
seriousAccidents and incidents were not always recorded or investigated. Inspectors found no evidence that lessons had been learned from one skin tear.
“Accidents and incidents weren't always recorded to monitor trends and patterns.” from the report
Management oversight
seriousThe home's audits failed to identify problems with repositioning, staffing and incident records. This led to a breach of the good governance regulation.
“Audits undertaken failed to identify staff were not repositioning people as required in their care plan, staffing levels were not adequate to meet people's needs and records were not easily accessible or indeed in place.” from the report
Closed staff culture
needs fixingStaff described a culture where some people were afraid to report poor practice. Inspectors also heard concerns about derogatory and racially offensive language between staff.
“Staff also confirmed some staff referred to their colleagues using derogatory and racially offensive language.” from the report
Delayed pain relief
needs fixingInspectors observed two people asking for pain relief, but neither received it swiftly because staff were focused on task-based activities.
“People did not always receive pain relieving medicines in a timely manner.” from the report
- 01What has changed to make sure every person is repositioned at the times set out by their healthcare professional?
- 02How many care staff are now on each floor during the day and night, and how are long shifts and staff fatigue prevented?
- 03How are accidents, incidents and skin injuries now recorded, investigated and checked for lessons learned?
- 04What action has been taken to address the closed culture and make it safe for staff to report poor practice?
- 05How will you make sure requests for pain relief are answered promptly when staff are busy with other tasks?
This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only, with infection prevention and control also reviewed; the other key question ratings carried over from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 27 October 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Heathland Court Care Home
8 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.
- August 2023Goodcurrent ratingup from Requires improvementSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- October 2022Requires improvementdown from GoodSafe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement
- March 2021Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodWell-led: Good
- June 2018Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodWell-led: Good
- October 2016Goodup from Requires improvementSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- February 2016Requires improvementstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvement
- February 2016Requires improvementstayed Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvement
- August 2015Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Good
- July 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- March 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- June 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- January 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- December 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- April 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- November 2011
Report published without a new overall rating.
- November 2010
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 12 November 2010.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.
Weigh the report against the rest
Fees, photos and reviews from families
How to read CQC ratings and reports
What to check when you visit
At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Merton
These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.
Most charge £980 to £1,230 a week. 78 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.
“She cared for my mum with Alzheimer's with endless patience and kindness, always arriving with a smile and a positive attitude”
“Without his support we wouldn't have been able to navigate bringing and keeping Dad at home.”
Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.