Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Hazel Homes for Autism

Goodpublished 31 March 2026, 6 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, October 2019

Hazel Homes for Autism is rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and highly personalised care, with some records and end-of-life planning still needing attention.

This was the home’s first inspection since registration. It was unannounced and took place on 26 September 2019. One inspector reviewed care plans, staff files, rotas, medicines records, policies and management checks. They also observed care and spoke with the manager and three staff members.

The home supported three young adults with learning disabilities and autism, and could support up to five people. Inspectors found good care in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. They found personalised risk plans, safe medicines systems, enough staff, suitable training and clean premises.

People were supported to make choices, build independence, access healthcare and take part in activities. Care plans contained detailed information about people's needs and preferences. Inspectors recommended planning for end-of-life care and noted that some care plans were not dated, which could make regular reviews harder.

What inspectors praised
  • Personalised risk support

    Risk plans were detailed and tailored to each person. They aimed to keep people safe while allowing them to try new things and become more independent.

    “People's risk management plans not only considered how to reduce risks in day to day life such as risks associated with eating, medicines and the home environment, but also promoted positive risk taking.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful staff

    Staff understood people's behaviour and communication needs. They supported privacy, dignity, choice and independence.

    “Staff knew people well, treated them with kindness and respect, and promoted equality, privacy and dignity.” from the report
  • Detailed care planning

    Care plans contained detailed guidance about individual needs, preferences and daily activities. This helped staff provide consistent support.

    “People received highly personalised care because the provider gathered detailed information about them and used this to plan their care.” from the report
  • Meaningful activities and relationships

    People were supported to take part in activities they enjoyed, visit the community and maintain relationships with family and friends.

    “Each person had a personalised programme of activities that were meaningful and enjoyable to them and promoted their wellbeing.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • End-of-life planning

    minor

    The home had not yet discussed end-of-life preferences with people and their families. Inspectors recommended that it use suitable guidance in case someone died unexpectedly.

    “We recommend that the provider consults appropriate guidance about planning end of life care in case of an unexpected death.” from the report
  • Care plan dates

    needs fixing

    Some care plans did not have dates. Although they were up to date at the time, inspectors said this could make it difficult to ensure regular reviews as people's needs changed.

    “Care plans did not always have dates on them.” from the report
  • Notification process

    minor

    The home initially used the wrong process to notify CQC about authorisations to deprive people of their liberty. The manager corrected this and sent the notifications before the inspection ended.

    “Because the registered manager misunderstood one of their regulatory requirements, they did not use the correct process to send us notifications about authorisations to deprive people of their liberty although they did inform us using a different method.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How do you now record and review each person's end-of-life wishes and preferences?
  2. 02Are all care plans now dated, and how often are they reviewed when people's needs or preferences change?
  3. 03How do you make sure statutory notifications, including those about deprivation of liberty authorisations, are sent using the correct process?
  4. 04How will you support my relative to communicate choices about personal care, food, activities and healthcare?
  5. 05How will you help my relative build daily living skills and work towards greater independence?

This was an unannounced first inspection covering the home, care provided and all five CQC questions; people using the service were not able to describe their experiences and structured observations were not possible. This explanation was written from the published report of 30 October 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Hazel Homes for Autism

Each visit the CQC has published, newest first, back to the day the home was registered.

  1. October 2019Goodcurrent rating
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Hazel Homes for Autism →

  2. September 2018

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 27 September 2018.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Sutton

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,230 a week. 81 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“She cared for my mum with Alzheimer's with endless patience and kindness, always arriving with a smile and a positive attitude”
Marie-anne B., about Carla A.
“Terry has been of invaluable help to our family while working as a part-time live-in carer for our mother for approximately 6 months”
Bianca V., about Terry S.
See live-in carers near SuttonProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.