Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Hayling Road

Goodpublished 20 February 2019, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors found enough staff, comprehensive and updated risk assessments, suitable safeguarding arrangements and safe medicines storage and administration. They noted that instructions for medicines given when needed were stored separately from the main medicines records.
Effective?
Good
Staff were trained, supervised and assessed as competent. People had support with health care, nutrition, communication, mental capacity decisions and transitions between services.
Caring?
Good
Inspectors observed kindness, patience and respect. People were supported to make choices, maintain relationships and have their identity, culture and preferences respected.
Responsive?
Good
Care plans were detailed, personal and updated when people's needs changed. People were supported with individual activities, community access, accessible information and complaints.
Well-led?
Good
Inspectors found approachable managers, regular audits and good oversight. Staff and relatives described the management as supportive, although one relative was concerned about maintaining standards as the home grew.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2019

Hayling Road rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with a minor medicines-record issue.

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection on 26 November 2018. Inspectors reviewed five care plans, staff records, training information, audits, policies and safety records. They also spoke with managers, staff and five family members, and observed care.

The home was rated Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, good risk assessments, safe medicines management, trained staff and support for people's health, choices and legal rights.

People were treated with kindness and respect. Care plans were detailed and regularly updated, activities reflected people's interests, and families said they felt involved and able to raise concerns.

The overall rating stayed Good from the previous inspection. The report says there was no evidence of serious risks or concerns. Inspectors did note that instructions for medicines given when needed were stored separately from the main medicines records, rather than with them as good practice suggests.

What inspectors praised
  • Stable staffing

    The home had a consistent workforce and inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs. Staff knew the people they supported well.

    “Staffing levels remained consistent and the service benefited from a stable workforce.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Inspectors saw staff treating people with patience, kindness and respect. Relatives were also consistently positive about the care.

    “Throughout our inspection visit, we observed staff demonstrating kindness, patience and respect” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Each person had a detailed plan covering their history, communication, preferences and support needs. Plans were reviewed and updated as needs changed.

    “Each person who used the service at Hayling Road had a comprehensive Person-Centred Plan (PCP).” from the report
  • Good management oversight

    The managers were described as approachable and supportive. Regular audits, meetings and feedback were used to monitor and improve the service.

    “There was an effective and robust system for audit and quality assurance to monitor the service provided.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Medicines instructions stored separately

    minor

    Instructions for medicines given when needed were not stored with the main medicines administration records. Inspectors discussed this with the manager as an area of good practice to improve.

    “good practice indicates such protocols should be easily accessible and stored with the Medicines Administration Record (MAR).” from the report
  • Maintaining quality as the home grows

    minor

    One relative was concerned that the increase from four to seven people could make care less focused on individuals. Inspectors still rated the home Good and did not identify this as a breach.

    “The pressure is on charities like Stockdales to keep standards whilst maintaining quality.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are instructions for medicines given when needed now stored and checked?
  2. 02How will you keep care personalised as the home supports up to seven people?
  3. 03How are families involved in reviewing and changing care plans?
  4. 04What training and supervision will the staff supporting my relative receive?
  5. 05How can we raise a concern, and how will you tell us what action has been taken?

This was a comprehensive inspection covering all five CQC questions, and all five ratings remained Good from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 20 February 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Hayling Road

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. February 2019Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Hayling Road →

  2. January 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. January 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. November 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. March 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 20 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Trafford

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 91 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“Primrose is a very kind and compassionate healthcare professional”
Marion L., about Primrose N.
“She is an exemplary carer, she is knowledgable empathetic and very respectful in the home.”
Katrina R., about Camille F.
See live-in carers near TraffordProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.