Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Haydock House

Outstandingpublished 26 February 2019, 7 years ago

Rated Outstanding: inspectors found the home performing exceptionally well.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Outstanding
Inspectors found detailed risk assessments, strong safeguarding systems, sufficient staffing and safe medicines arrangements. People were supported to take carefully planned positive risks and become more independent.
Effective?
Good
Staff were trained and knowledgeable, including about Prader-Willi syndrome. People's food intake and weight were closely monitored, and staff worked with health professionals.
Caring?
Good
People were treated with kindness, dignity and respect. Staff knew people's communication needs and involved them and their relatives in decisions about care.
Responsive?
Good
Care was personalised around people's goals, interests and relationships. People took part in activities, voluntary work, community life and planning their own support.
Well-led?
Outstanding
Inspectors found exceptional leadership, an open culture and strong systems for checking quality and learning from incidents. Staff felt supported, valued and able to suggest improvements.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2019

Rated Outstanding; inspectors found exceptionally safe, personalised care and exceptional leadership, with Good ratings for effective, caring and responsive support.

This was a planned, announced inspection. One inspector visited on 5 December 2018, reviewed records and the building, and spoke with people, relatives, staff and managers. Telephone discussions with two relatives took place on 6 December 2018.

The home supported six people, with space for up to eight. It specialises in supporting adults with complex needs and behaviours linked to Prader-Willi syndrome. Inspectors found strong safety systems, very good staffing levels and detailed risk management.

People were involved in their care, staff recruitment and decisions about their lives. Inspectors found kind, respectful relationships, personalised activities and strong support for independence. The home was rated Outstanding overall, with Outstanding ratings for Safe and Well-led, and Good ratings for Effective, Caring and Responsive.

The previous overall rating was Good, published in August 2016. Inspectors said the home had improved to Outstanding in the Safe and Well-led areas.

What inspectors praised
  • Strong safety planning

    Risks were assessed in detail and reviewed quickly after changes or incidents. People were supported to stay safe while gaining independence in the community.

    “Risks to people were fully assessed and exceptionally well managed.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Staff built care around each person's needs, wishes, goals and aspirations. People were supported to develop skills, relationships and independence.

    “People were at the centre of their care and each person was treated as an individual.” from the report
  • Specialist health support

    Staff followed current guidance for Prader-Willi syndrome and worked with health professionals. Food intake and weight were closely monitored.

    “Each person's food intake was closely monitored to ensure they maintained a healthy weight in line with best practice guidance in relation to Prader-Willi syndrome.” from the report
  • Exceptional leadership

    Managers promoted person-centred care, independence and social inclusion. Staff described a positive culture and felt supported and valued.

    “There was an extremely positive and open culture that ensured people were at the centre of everything the service did.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How do you currently monitor food intake, weight and health risks for people with Prader-Willi syndrome?
  2. 02How are people involved in decisions about positive risk-taking and increasing their independence?
  3. 03Are the same registered manager, senior staff and staffing levels still in place?
  4. 04How do people and their relatives take part in care planning, complaints and service improvements?
  5. 05What training and specialist support do staff currently receive for Prader-Willi syndrome and positive behaviour support?

This was a planned inspection of the whole care home, covering Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. This explanation was written from the published report of 26 February 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Haydock House

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has improved, from Good to Outstanding.

  1. February 2019Outstandingcurrent ratingup from Good
    Safe: OutstandingEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Outstanding

    Read what inspectors found at Haydock House →

  2. August 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. September 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. February 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. December 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 21 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

89 live-in carers within about an hour of North Northamptonshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 76 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“If you bump into her in the night on her way to the bathroom she will still inquire how you are and if everything is alright.”
Caroline C., about Mary K.
See live-in carers near North NorthamptonshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.