Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Hartshill Care Home

Requires improvementpublished 21 January 2026, 8 months ago

Rated Requires improvement: inspectors found the home was not performing as well as it should and told it what to change.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, August 2023

Hartshill Care Home was rated Good overall; inspectors found safe, kind and well-organised care, with some work still needed before two units open.

This was the first inspection since the home registered. It was unannounced and took place on 1 August 2023. Inspectors spoke with people, relatives, staff and health professionals. They also observed care and checked care records, medicines, recruitment files and management records.

All five areas were rated Good: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, safe medicines systems, suitable risk plans and good infection control. People received support with food, drinks and health needs, and staff understood their choices and preferences.

People and relatives spoke positively about the care. Inspectors found staff were kind, respectful and responsive. The home was supporting 18 people at the visit, although it can support up to 67. Two of its four units were closed while further environmental and safety work was completed.

What inspectors praised
  • Enough staff

    Staffing was sufficient for people's needs at the time of inspection. People said staff responded promptly when they needed help.

    “There were enough staff to ensure people's needs were consistently met in a safe way.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    People and relatives spoke positively about staff's friendliness and support. Inspectors found that privacy, dignity and personal choices were respected.

    “People spoke positively about the friendliness and care shown by staff.” from the report
  • Food and health support

    People were offered choices and encouraged to eat and drink enough. Staff monitored health and referred concerns promptly to healthcare professionals.

    “People were supported to have enough to eat and drink so they would remain well.” from the report
  • Open management

    Staff felt able to raise concerns and received support from managers. The provider used quality checks and learning from incidents to improve care.

    “The provider's quality assurance systems demonstrated areas needing improvement were identified and acted upon.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Two units remained closed

    needs fixing

    Only two of the home's four units were open. The other two were staying closed until environmental and safety work was completed.

    “The provider told us the remaining 2 units would remain closed until further work had been completed to ensure they met required environmental and safety standards.” from the report
  • End of life information

    needs fixing

    Staff had anticipatory medicines available and had considered people's preferences. However, the report says more information was needed about how people wanted to spend their final days.

    “However, further work was planned to ensure enough information was provided on how people wished to live their final days.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What environmental and safety work is still needed in the two closed units, and when will it be finished?
  2. 02How will staffing levels be checked before more people are admitted?
  3. 03How will you record and regularly update my relative's wishes for end of life care?
  4. 04How will my relative's food, drink and health needs be monitored and shared with their family?
  5. 05How can residents and relatives raise concerns, and how will the home show what action was taken?

This was the first unannounced inspection and assessed all five key questions, including the care provided and the premises. This explanation was written from the published report of 24 August 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Hartshill Care Home

Each visit the CQC has published, newest first, back to the day the home was registered.

  1. August 2023Goodcurrent rating
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Hartshill Care Home →

  2. November 2022

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 10 November 2022.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Warwickshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £950 to £1,260 a week. 77 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“If you bump into her in the night on her way to the bathroom she will still inquire how you are and if everything is alright.”
Caroline C., about Mary K.
“I have never met a person who is so kind and thinks about others before himself to such an extent as Chris Malagala.”
Brian G., about Chris M.
See live-in carers near WarwickshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.