CQC report explained · a residential care home
What the CQC found at Harboro
Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.
What inspectors found, March 2018
Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with a few records and notification issues to keep under review.
The home supports five people with learning disabilities and complex health needs. Inspectors made an unannounced visit on 6 February 2018. They spoke with people, relatives, managers and care staff, and checked care files, staff records and management systems.
The overall rating stayed Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found that staff knew people well, medicines were managed safely, health and dietary needs were met, and people were supported with activities and daily choices.
There were some points to improve. The home needed to notify the CQC about all safeguarding matters, update written speech and language guidance, and correct a difference between two epilepsy care plans. The report did not identify serious risks or concerns.
Personalised care
Care plans described people's routines, preferences, communication and support needs. Staff were able to explain how each person liked to be supported.
“Clear person centred care plans were in place detailing people's interests, likes, dislikes and the support routines for the day.” from the report
Kind and respectful staff
Inspectors saw positive relationships between people and staff. Staff understood how to protect privacy and dignity and how to communicate with people in different ways.
“Our observations showed that people living at Harboro had formed positive relations with the staff team.” from the report
Staff training
Staff received induction, specialist training and regular competency checks for complex health needs such as epilepsy and suction equipment.
“This meant the service had a robust system in place to check that the staff were competent to meet people's assessed needs effectively.” from the report
Safe medicines
Staff were trained and checked as competent to give medicines. Records showed people received medicines as prescribed, including emergency epilepsy medicines when needed outside the home.
“People's medicines were safely managed. Staff had been trained on the safe administration of medicines” from the report
Activities and access
People were supported to take part in activities and holidays. Drivers were available so activities could continue even when staff on duty could not drive.
“The provider had employed drivers which could be pre booked to ensure people were able to access their activities even if the staff on duty did not drive themselves.” from the report
Quality monitoring
The home used monthly audits, surveys, management checks and action plans to monitor care and identify improvements.
“A robust quality assurance framework was in place.” from the report
Safeguarding notifications
needs fixingThe home was reminded to tell the CQC about every safeguarding matter involving people it supported, including matters first raised by another organisation.
“We discussed with the registered manager the need to inform the Care Quality Commission about all safeguardings' concerning people supported by the service, even when they were initially raised by a third party.” from the report
Outdated health guidance
needs fixingWritten speech and language guidance still said that one person's fluids needed thickening, although staff said this was no longer required. Inspectors recommended that the written guidance be updated.
“We recommend that the service asks SALT to update their written guidance to reflect the verbal advice they had been given.” from the report
Different epilepsy instructions
needs fixingOne person's general care plan and epilepsy plan gave different instructions about when to call an ambulance after a seizure. The manager said this would be corrected.
“We noted that one person's person centred care plan had a discrepancy with the person's epilepsy care plan with regard to how soon an ambulance should be called if a seizure continued.” from the report
- 01Have the written speech and language instructions been updated, and how are staff told about changes to them?
- 02How do you make sure all safeguarding matters are notified to the CQC, including concerns first raised by another organisation?
- 03Has the difference between the epilepsy care plan and the person-centred care plan been corrected?
- 04How are staff checked as competent to support people with complex health needs, including epilepsy rescue medication?
- 05How are people and their relatives involved in reviewing care plans and choosing activities?
This was an unannounced inspection covering all five quality areas and checking the overall rating; the report says the rating remained unchanged from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 13 March 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Harboro
2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.
- March 2018Goodcurrent ratingstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- January 2016GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- December 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- May 2013
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 10 May 2013.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.
Weigh the report against the rest
Fees, photos and reviews from families
How to read CQC ratings and reports
What to check when you visit
At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Trafford
These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.
Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 91 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.
“Primrose is a very kind and compassionate healthcare professional”
“She is an exemplary carer, she is knowledgable empathetic and very respectful in the home.”
Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.