CQC report explained · a residential care home
What the CQC found at Hanford Court Care Home
Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.
- Safe?
- Good
- Inspectors were assured that the home had arrangements to prevent and control infection. They found evidence covering visitors, social distancing, admissions, protective equipment, testing, hygiene and outbreak management.
- Effective?
- Good
- This area was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
- Caring?
- Outstanding
- This area was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
- Responsive?
- Good
- This area was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
- Well-led?
- Good
- This area was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
What inspectors found, November 2020
Hanford Court Care Home was inspected but not rated; inspectors were assured about infection prevention and control.
This was an announced, targeted inspection on 20 October 2020. It looked only at infection prevention and control during the coronavirus pandemic.
Inspectors were assured that the home used personal protective equipment safely, followed social distancing and shielding rules, supported safe admissions, and had arrangements for testing.
The home had a booking system for visits, with cleaning between visits. It also assessed people's wellbeing, supported staff who were at higher risk, and kept extra rooms available in case an outbreak required people to be moved.
The overall service was marked inspected but not rated. This means the inspection checked infection control arrangements but did not give a quality rating for the home.
Managed visits
The home had a booking system agreed after consulting people and relatives. Visits took place in a room with direct outside access, and the area was cleaned between visits.
“There was a booking system in place which had been implemented after consultation with people and their relatives.” from the report
Wellbeing checks
Regular wellbeing assessments were used to identify and act on possible deterioration in people's mental health.
“The registered manager had carried out regular wellbeing assessments for people who used the service to ensure signs to suggest there had been a deterioration in their mental health were identified and acted on.” from the report
Staff support
The home discussed staff anxieties, assessed risks for staff at higher risk, and provided access to an emotional support helpline.
“Discussions had been held with staff to reduce their anxieties and risk assessments were carried out with staff who were at high risk to ensure their safety when supporting people.” from the report
Staff continuity
A consistent staff group had been trained in different roles. This was intended to reduce staff movement between services and lower the risk of cross infection.
“There was a consistent staff group at the service, who had been trained in different roles to ensure there were enough staff available to support people.” from the report
Outbreak planning
The home kept some rooms vacant so people could be moved and zones created if an outbreak occurred.
“The provider had made the decision to keep some vacancies to ensure they had extra rooms to allow for movement and zoning of people if there was an outbreak within the service.” from the report
Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.
- 01What infection control arrangements are currently in place, and how have they changed since the October 2020 inspection?
- 02How are visits booked now, and how is the visiting area cleaned between visits?
- 03How are residents and staff tested, and how is personal protective equipment used?
- 04What happens if there is an infection outbreak, including whether rooms are available for zoning or moving people?
- 05How are residents' mental wellbeing and any changes in their mental health monitored?
This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control only; it did not rate the other four key questions or give an overall quality rating. This explanation was written from the published report of 3 November 2020 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
What inspectors found, January 2020
Hanford Court Care Home is rated Good overall, with Outstanding caring and strong findings on safety, support and leadership.
This was an unannounced inspection on 12 December 2019. One inspector and an Expert by Experience spoke with people, relatives, staff and health professionals. They observed care and checked care, medicines, complaints and management records.
The home was supporting 61 people. Inspectors found people were safe, received effective care and had their needs met. Medicines were given as prescribed, staffing was sufficient and risks were assessed and reviewed.
The strongest area was caring, which improved from Good to Outstanding. Inspectors found people were treated with exceptional kindness, involved in decisions and supported to stay independent and maintain important relationships.
The overall rating stayed Good, as did Safe, Effective, Responsive and Well-led. The home was rated Outstanding for Caring. The previous overall rating was Good, published on 13 June 2017.
Exceptionally caring staff
Inspectors found staff consistently showed kindness, empathy and respect. People and relatives were very positive about the care.
“People received an exceptionally caring service. People and relatives told us they felt staff were all very caring.” from the report
People have a real say
People helped shape the home, including taking part in staff recruitment and running resident meetings. Staff supported people to make choices in ways they could understand.
“People had control and input over the service development and ran the resident meetings deciding items for discussion and making decisions and choices.” from the report
Independence is supported
Care plans and practical solutions helped people do things for themselves and remain in control where possible.
“Promoting people's independence was central to the culture of the home.” from the report
Safe and organised care
Inspectors found that risks were assessed, medicines records were accurate, staffing was sufficient and incidents were reviewed for learning.
“There were systems in place to learn when things went wrong. Accidents and incidents were monitored and action was taken to prevent incidents from reoccurring.” from the report
Oral care plans were being reviewed
minorAt the time of inspection, the home was reviewing people's individual oral care needs. Ask what this review found and whether updated plans are now in place.
“The registered manager told us they were in the process of reviewing people's individual oral care needs.” from the report
- 01What did the review of my relative's oral care needs find, and is there now a detailed plan?
- 02How will you support my relative's specific health needs, including any dementia, diabetes, eating or drinking risks?
- 03How will my relative be involved in decisions about their care and in activities that match their interests?
- 04How do you make sure relatives are informed when incidents or changes in care happen?
- 05How do you check that medicines, repositioning, diet and fluids are being managed as set out in care plans?
This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering all five CQC questions and both the premises and care provided; all five ratings were reviewed. This explanation was written from the published report of 17 January 2020 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Hanford Court Care Home
3 rated inspections over 5 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.
- November 2020Inspected but not ratedcurrent ratingSafe: Inspected but not rated
- January 2020Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: OutstandingResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- June 2017Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- June 2015GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- July 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- January 2013
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 23 January 2013.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.
Weigh the report against the rest
Fees, photos and reviews from families
How to read CQC ratings and reports
What to check when you visit
At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Stoke-on-Trent
These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.
Most charge £980 to £1,190 a week. 93 can care for a couple. 9 years' experience on average.
“She's shown compassion, patience and a level of understanding that no other carer has given.”
“She maintained a great environment for mum both with the tidiness and cleanliness of the house and Mum and with her caring and understanding attitude.”
Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.