Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Hallamshire Residential Home

Goodpublished 22 May 2019, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors were assured that the home was managing infection risks, including cleaning, protective equipment, testing, admissions and outbreak arrangements. Visiting arrangements were being restarted after the COVID-19 outbreak.
Effective?
Good
This area was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
Caring?
Good
This area was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
Responsive?
Requires improvement
This area was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
Well-led?
Good
This area was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, November 2021

Inspected but not rated; inspectors found strong infection control, while visiting arrangements were still being restarted.

This was a planned, announced inspection on 3 November 2021. It was a targeted inspection looking only at infection prevention and control after a COVID-19 outbreak.

Inspectors found the home was very clean. Staff followed cleaning schedules, used protective equipment correctly, and had enough supplies. COVID-19 testing and checks before new people moved in were also being carried out.

Visits had stopped during the outbreak and were being restarted. A screened visiting area had reopened, but inspectors signposted the home to updated government guidance to help it develop its visiting arrangements.

The home was inspected but not rated. This report does not provide an overall quality rating or ratings for most areas of care.

What inspectors praised
  • Clean environment

    The home was very clean, with regular cleaning of all areas and extra cleaning of frequently touched surfaces.

    “The premises were very clean. Staff followed cleaning schedules to ensure all areas of the home were regularly cleaned.” from the report
  • Protective equipment

    Staff had training in infection safety and used protective equipment correctly. The home had enough supplies available.

    “Staff had received training about how to keep people safe from the risk of infection and how to use personal protective equipment (PPE) correctly.” from the report
  • Testing and admissions

    Testing was being carried out for staff and residents. The home checked that new residents had recently tested negative before arriving.

    “Tests for COVID-19 were being carried out in line with government guidance, by both staff and people living in the home.” from the report
  • Infection control systems

    Inspectors were assured that the home had arrangements to prevent and manage infection outbreaks and an up-to-date infection control policy.

    “We were assured the provider was making sure infection outbreaks can be effectively prevented or managed.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Visiting arrangements were still developing

    minor

    Visits were being restarted after the outbreak. Inspectors asked the home to review its arrangements against updated government guidance.

    “We signposted the provider to the updated government guidance in respect of visits to care homes, to support them to develop their approach.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What are the current visiting arrangements, and can family members enter the main building?
  2. 02What would happen to visits if there were another COVID-19 outbreak?
  3. 03How will you tell families about any changes to visiting arrangements?
  4. 04How often are staff and residents tested when infection levels rise?
  5. 05What checks do you complete before someone moves into the home?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control only; the home was inspected but not rated, and the other care areas were not assessed. This explanation was written from the published report of 16 November 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, November 2020

Inspected but not rated; inspectors found strong infection controls, with some cleaning and staff risk-assessment issues.

Inspectors visited on 23 October 2020 as part of a national review of infection prevention and control in care homes. The visit was announced and focused on how the home was managing COVID-19 risks.

They found good arrangements for preventing infection. These included safe visiting areas, updated policies, staff training, correct use of protective equipment, testing, hand hygiene and extra cleaning.

Some areas needed attention. Shower chairs and grout in the main bathroom needed a deeper clean. There were also no formal arrangements in place for staff who might be at increased risk from COVID-19, although the registered manager said this would be addressed.

The home was inspected but not rated. This means the report does not give a Good, Requires improvement or Inadequate rating. It only reports on the infection prevention and control measures inspected at that visit.

What inspectors praised
  • Good infection control

    Inspectors found that people were protected against infection and that the home had systems to prevent and manage outbreaks.

    “People were protected against the risk of infection.” from the report
  • Safer visiting arrangements

    The home had created designated visiting areas and made separate arrangements for visits to people receiving end of life care.

    “The home had robust systems in place to support relatives to visit their family members, minimising the risk of infection.” from the report
  • Trained and informed staff

    Staff had training in infection control, COVID-19 and the use of PPE. They were also kept informed about changes to government advice.

    “Staff we spoke with were knowledgeable about the updates and were working in line with them.” from the report
  • PPE and hygiene

    Inspectors observed staff changing PPE when appropriate and washing or sanitising their hands.

    “We observed staff changed PPE, when appropriate, and washed and sanitised their hands.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Some cleaning needed improvement

    needs fixing

    Shower chairs needed further cleaning and the grout in the main bathroom needed a deep clean. The registered manager agreed to address this immediately.

    “We identified some areas required attention. For example, shower chairs required further cleaning and the grout between the wall tiles in the main bathroom required a deep clean.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What was done after the inspection to deep-clean the shower chairs and the grout in the main bathroom?
  2. 02What formal arrangements are now in place for staff who may be at increased risk from COVID-19?
  3. 03How are infection control policies and staff training kept up to date?
  4. 04How do family visits work now, including visits to people receiving end of life care?
  5. 05How are COVID-19 tests arranged for residents and staff?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control only; the service was inspected but not rated and the other care quality areas were not assessed. This explanation was written from the published report of 18 November 2020 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Hallamshire Residential Home

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. November 2021Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Hallamshire Residential Home →

  2. November 2020Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Hallamshire Residential Home →

  3. May 2019Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. November 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. December 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. February 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. December 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. December 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 9 December 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

90 live-in carers within about an hour of Sheffield

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,020 to £1,270 a week. 76 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“Carla has been a god send with the implementation of bringing mum back home from respite care.”
Claire A., about Carla M.
“Beatrice was a talent dementia carer whose professionalism and dedication allowed mums wishes to remain in her own her come true.”
Alison P., about Beatrice M.
See live-in carers near SheffieldProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.