Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Halecroft Grange

Outstandingpublished 25 August 2023, 3 years ago

Rated Outstanding: inspectors found the home performing exceptionally well.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
People were protected from abuse and avoidable harm. Inspectors found safe staffing and recruitment, regular risk checks, safe medicines management and effective infection control.
Effective?
Good
People received timely healthcare support and staff had suitable training and induction. Assessments considered people's needs and choices, although feedback about food was mixed.
Caring?
Outstanding
Inspectors found an exceptionally kind, inclusive and person-centred culture. People were treated with dignity, supported to remain independent and encouraged to pursue their interests.
Responsive?
Outstanding
Care was tailored to people's life histories, needs and communication preferences. The home provided a wide range of activities, strong dementia support and exceptional end-of-life care.
Well-led?
Outstanding
The home had strong leadership, an open culture and robust systems for checking quality, incidents, safeguarding, complaints, health and safety and medicines.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, August 2023

Halecroft Grange is rated Outstanding overall, with exceptionally caring, responsive and well-led care, and Good ratings for safety and effectiveness.

Inspectors visited without warning on 15 and 16 May 2023. They spoke with people living at the home, relatives, staff and health professionals. They reviewed care records, medicines records, staff recruitment files and management records.

They found people were safe, received their medicines properly and had risks assessed. Staff were trained, recruitment checks were completed and infection control arrangements were effective. People received timely support from health professionals and the home followed the Mental Capacity Act.

The strongest findings were about kindness, personalised care, activities and leadership. The home supported people to follow their interests, stay involved with family and community life, and receive individualised dementia and end-of-life care.

The overall Outstanding rating means inspectors judged the service to be exceptional overall. Safety and effectiveness were rated Good, while caring, responsiveness and leadership were rated Outstanding. The previous rating was Good in 2018 under a previous provider.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and respectful staff

    People and relatives described staff as kind, respectful and willing to spend time with them. Inspectors also received very positive feedback from health professionals.

    “The staff know me well they are so lovely to me and very kind and always respectful” from the report
  • Personalised dementia care

    Staff used life stories and one-to-one work to understand people with dementia and adapt care around their experiences, preferences and possible causes of distress.

    “The approach to dementia care was excellent. People were empowered, listened to and valued.” from the report
  • Wide range of activities

    People had daily activities, individual and group options, evening activities and regular community outings. Activities were based on people's past interests and wishes.

    “Activity provision was excellent and people were fully involved in the design and delivery of the activities programme.” from the report
  • Strong family involvement

    Families were involved in care and could join activities, forums and social events. The home also provided regular updates through newsletters and online communication.

    “Families were fully engaged in the care provided.” from the report
  • Robust oversight

    Inspectors found effective systems for checking quality and tracking incidents, safeguarding concerns and complaints. Leaders acted on shortfalls identified through audits.

    “Highly effective and robust governance systems supported the provision of high-quality person-centred care and support.” from the report
  • Exceptional end-of-life care

    The home used trained end-of-life care champions and worked with families and health professionals. Inspectors found care was personal and went beyond basic requirements.

    “The home delivered exceptional end of life care.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Mixed views about food

    minor

    Although some people praised the food and menus offered choices, another person said meals could arrive tepid and that quality was not always good.

    “I do feel that what lets this place down is the food it arrives tepid and the quality isn't the best.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are you checking that meals are served hot and that food quality continues to improve?
  2. 02How has the new electronic medicines management system affected missed or late medicines?
  3. 03How would you use my relative's life history and preferences to plan their daily care and activities?
  4. 04How would my family be involved in care reviews, residents' meetings and concerns about care?
  5. 05How often would my relative receive GP, district nurse or other health professional support if their health changed?

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering all five key questions, including the care provided and the home environment. This explanation was written from the published report of 25 August 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2022

Halecroft Grange was inspected but not rated; inspectors found strong infection prevention and control arrangements.

This was an announced, targeted inspection on 23 February 2022. Inspectors gave the home 24 hours' notice.

The inspection focused on infection prevention and control during the COVID-19 pandemic. Inspectors also asked about staffing pressures and whether these affected care.

Inspectors found the home clean, with regular cleaning of high-touch areas. Visitors were screened and asked to use hand hygiene, PPE, testing and vaccination evidence. Staff had PPE and training, and the home was following the visiting guidance.

The service was inspected but not rated. This means the report does not give an overall quality rating or a full rating for all five areas of care.

What inspectors praised
  • Clean environment

    The home was clean and well presented. Cleaning schedules included high-touch areas such as door handles and handrails.

    “The home was clean and well presented. Staff had access to cleaning products and cleaning schedules included high touch areas such as door handles and handrails, which were cleaned regularly.” from the report
  • PPE and testing

    Staff had access to PPE and had been trained to use it. People living in the home and staff had regular COVID-19 testing and had received vaccinations.

    “Staff had access to supplies of PPE and had received training to ensure they used this correctly.” from the report
  • Visitor safety

    Visitors were screened on arrival and asked to wash and sanitise their hands, use PPE, show a negative lateral flow test and provide vaccination evidence.

    “On arrival to the home, visitors were asked to complete and sign a screening form regarding COVID-19 symptoms and were asked to wash and sanitise their hands, put on personal protective equipment (PPE), show a negative lateral flow test and provide proof of a vaccination status prior to moving from the reception area.” from the report
  • Visits were supported

    The home was facilitating visits in line with the guidance in place at the time of the inspection.

    “The provider was facilitating visits for people living in the home in accordance with the current guidance.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What measures are currently in place to manage COVID-19-related staffing pressures?
  2. 02How often are high-touch areas such as door handles and handrails cleaned?
  3. 03What are the current requirements for visitors regarding testing, PPE and vaccination evidence?
  4. 04How are COVID-19 testing and vaccination arrangements managed for people living here and staff?
  5. 05How does the home safely manage visits when there is an infection outbreak?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control, with questions about staffing pressures; the service was inspected but not rated overall. This explanation was written from the published report of 18 March 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Halecroft Grange

4 rated inspections over 6 years: the service has improved, from Good to Outstanding.

  1. August 2023Outstandingcurrent ratingstayed Outstanding
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: OutstandingResponsive: OutstandingWell-led: Outstanding

    Read what inspectors found at Halecroft Grange →

  2. August 2023Outstanding
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: OutstandingResponsive: OutstandingWell-led: Outstanding
  3. March 2022Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Halecroft Grange →

  4. October 2018Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Good
  5. July 2017Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
  6. December 2021

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 10 December 2021.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Trafford

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 91 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“Primrose is a very kind and compassionate healthcare professional”
Marion L., about Primrose N.
“She is an exemplary carer, she is knowledgable empathetic and very respectful in the home.”
Katrina R., about Camille F.
See live-in carers near TraffordProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.