Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Greathed Manor Nursing Home

Goodpublished 9 October 2024, 23 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, June 2018

Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with some improvements still being put in place.

This was an unannounced inspection on 11 April 2018. Two inspectors, a nursing specialist and an expert by experience observed care, meals, medicines, activities and the home. They spoke with five people, two relatives and four staff, and checked care plans, staff records, medicines and quality checks.

The home was rated Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, safe medicines systems, good infection control and appropriate safeguarding arrangements. People were treated with kindness and respect, received suitable food and healthcare, and had activities linked to their interests.

The manager had started in February 2018 and had applied to become registered. The previous inspection in January 2016 was also rated Good. Improvements had been made following earlier recommendations about activities and care planning. Inspectors also raised some issues during this visit, and the manager took action on several of them.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe medicines

    Inspectors found clear systems for ordering, storing, administering and checking medicines. Records were complete and weekly audits were carried out.

    “MAR charts were legible with no gaps.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Staff knew people well, protected their privacy and encouraged them to remain independent. Inspectors saw staff spending time with people without appearing rushed.

    “Staff treated people with kindness, dignity and respect.” from the report
  • Activities and inclusion

    The home had activities during the week and at weekends, including arts, gardening, music, games and outings. An extra staff member helped people cared for in their rooms join in.

    “The extra member of staff meant that people had access to activities at weekends in addition to weekdays.” from the report
  • Listening and improvement

    The manager improved communication and used meetings to gather views about food and activities. A new food trolley followed complaints about cold food.

    “People had been asked for their ideas about the food at the home and these had formed the basis of the new menu.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Emergency evacuation confidence

    needs fixing

    One staff member did not feel confident about emergency evacuation procedures. The manager arranged refresher fire training after inspectors raised this.

    “one member of staff told us that they did not feel confident in emergency evacuation procedures.” from the report
  • Mental capacity training

    needs fixing

    One staff member did not feel confident in their knowledge of the Mental Capacity Act. The manager arranged face-to-face training for all staff after the inspection.

    “One staff member told us they had all the training they needed to meet people's needs but did not feel confident in their knowledge of the MCA.” from the report
  • Dining table access

    needs fixing

    One wheelchair user could not sit at a table with other people because their wheelchair did not fit underneath. Table raisers had been ordered after the inspection.

    “I'm always put here by the wall, and I want to sit at a table, I'm always sitting alone” from the report
  • Laundry complaint

    minor

    One relative complained that items had gone missing in the laundry and was not satisfied with the manager's response at the time. The manager was still working towards a solution.

    “They were not satisfied with the manager's response and told us that the manager was considering their response.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Has the manager's application to become the registered manager been completed?
  2. 02Has a clinical lead been appointed, and how is clinical oversight provided now?
  3. 03Was the planned refresher fire training completed, and are all staff confident about emergency evacuation procedures?
  4. 04Was face-to-face Mental Capacity Act and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards training completed for all staff?
  5. 05What was the final outcome of the missing laundry items complaint, and were the table raisers installed?

This was an unannounced inspection of the whole care home, covering all five CQC questions and both the premises and the care provided. This explanation was written from the published report of 16 June 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Greathed Manor Nursing Home

4 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has improved, from Inadequate to Good.

  1. June 2018Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Greathed Manor Nursing Home →

  2. April 2016Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. October 2015Requires improvementup from Inadequate
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. October 2015Inadequate
    Safe: InadequateEffective: InadequateCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. October 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. March 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. August 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 24 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

77 live-in carers within about an hour of Surrey

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,250 a week. 66 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“Without his support we wouldn't have been able to navigate bringing and keeping Dad at home.”
Emma P., about Aman A.
“Not only has she looked after him beautifully, she has also been great company for him with lively conversation, kindness and humour.”
Clare M., about Zion S.
See live-in carers near SurreyProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.