Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Gowlands

Goodpublished 24 October 2025, 11 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2018

Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and responsive care, but the home needed improvement in its management and quality checks.

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection on 14 February 2018. Inspectors spoke with people, relatives and staff. They also reviewed care plans, risk assessments, medicines records, staffing records and quality checks.

The home provided respite care for up to nine people with learning disabilities, sensory impairment, physical disability and complex needs. Six people were staying there during the inspection. Inspectors found the home safe, effective, caring and responsive.

The overall rating stayed Good, as did four of the five areas inspected. Well-led was rated Requires Improvement because there was no registered manager and some quality monitoring checks had not been maintained.

What inspectors praised
  • People felt safe

    People and relatives told inspectors they felt safe. Staff understood safeguarding procedures, and risk plans were in place to support people's freedom while reducing risks.

    “People told us they felt safe when they stayed at Gowlands.” from the report
  • Kind and personal care

    Staff listened to people and understood their individual likes, dislikes and preferred routines. Inspectors saw respectful and considerate interactions.

    “Staff interacted with people in a kind and considerate way and took time to listen closely to what people were saying to them.” from the report
  • Tailored respite stays

    Care plans covered people's personal, cultural, communication and support needs. Activities and community links were arranged around people's choices and abilities.

    “People were provided with opportunities to try new things and to do things they enjoyed.” from the report
  • Safe staffing and recruitment

    Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs. Recruitment checks, including references and DBS checks, were completed before staff started.

    “There were sufficient staffing levels to meet people's care and support needs safely.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • No registered manager

    needs fixing

    The home had been without a registered manager since December 2016. Two senior leaders were sharing day-to-day responsibility, and a new manager and deputy manager were due to start after the inspection.

    “The service had been without a registered manager since December 2016.” from the report
  • Quality checks were not consistent

    needs fixing

    Some medicine audits, checks of staff competence and observations of staff practice had not continued since the previous inspection. The provider said it was addressing these gaps.

    “Some internal audit and quality assurance systems such as medication audits, checks to ensure staff remained competent to administer medication and observations of staff practice had not been sustained since our last inspection.” from the report
  • One medicines record needed a second check

    needs fixing

    A handwritten medicines administration record had been completed by one staff member. Inspectors raised this with senior staff, who said two staff would check and sign such records.

    “However, we noted a handwritten MAR for one person had been completed by one member of staff.” from the report
  • Staff observations and supervision

    minor

    Formal observations of some staff practice had not been completed, and staff supervision had been irregular during 2017. The report says a supervision planner was introduced and regular supervisions had taken place from November 2017.

    “Records showed that staff supervisions had been irregular in 2017.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Has a registered manager now been appointed and registered, and who is responsible for the home each day?
  2. 02Are medication audits now completed regularly, including the required checks of handwritten medicines records?
  3. 03How often are staff observed carrying out medicines administration and moving and handling, and how are any problems followed up?
  4. 04Are staff now receiving regular supervision, and can you explain how this is recorded?
  5. 05How are feedback and concerns, including missing clothing, recorded and used to improve the service?

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering all five key questions; inspectors spoke with three people, three relatives and three staff and reviewed records including two people's care plans. This explanation was written from the published report of 16 March 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Gowlands

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. March 2018Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Gowlands →

  2. February 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. September 2014Inspected but not rated

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. August 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. February 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. April 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. November 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 7 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

35 live-in carers within about an hour of Essex

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,020 to £1,260 a week. 25 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“Not only was she professional, polite and efficient but she bought a lovely smile and laughter to my parents home.”
Liz L., about Sithembiso N.
“She brought fun and stimulation into mums life.”
Robert G., about Nechelle F.
See live-in carers near EssexProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.