Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Evergreen Manor Care Home

Goodpublished 3 September 2025, 13 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, August 2023

Evergreen Manor Care Home is rated Good; inspectors found safe care and stronger management after previous concerns.

This was an unannounced focused inspection on 13 and 19 July 2023. Inspectors checked whether earlier problems with safe care and management had been fixed. They spoke with people, relatives, staff and a health professional, and reviewed care plans, medicines records, audits, training and recruitment files.

The inspectors rated Safe and Well-led as Good. They found that risks were assessed, medicines were managed safely, infection controls were suitable, and there were enough staff. They also found better audits, action plans and systems to learn from accidents and incidents.

The home was previously rated Requires Improvement in August 2022 and had been in breach of regulations. Inspectors found enough improvement had been made and said it was no longer in breach. The overall rating changed to Good, but this inspection did not reassess Effective, Caring or Responsive.

What inspectors praised
  • Risks were managed

    Care plans included guidance about health and safety risks. Bed rails and bumpers were in place where needed, and catheter care followed best practice.

    “Risks to people's health and safety were assessed and guidance to manage those risks were included in people's care plans.” from the report
  • Medicines were safe

    People received medicines as prescribed. Staff were trained and checked as competent before giving medicines.

    “Medicines were managed safely, and people received their medicines as prescribed.” from the report
  • Enough suitable staff

    Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs. Recruitment checks included references and DBS checks.

    “There were enough staff to meet people's needs. Our observations and feedback confirmed this.” from the report
  • Learning from incidents

    The home introduced new systems after earlier findings and analysed accidents and incidents for patterns. It worked with health professionals when people needed extra support.

    “Accidents and incidents were recorded and analysed for trends and patterns.” from the report
  • Better oversight

    Regular audits and quality checks were being used to identify improvements. Monthly action plans were created when changes were needed.

    “A variety of audits and quality assurance checks were now carried out to monitor and improve the safety and quality of care provided to people.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are you continuing to check that bed rails, bumpers and bed heights remain safe for each person?
  2. 02How do you make sure catheter care continues to follow the required guidance?
  3. 03What do your current audits and monthly action plans show about any remaining areas for improvement?
  4. 04How do you review accidents and falls, and what support is provided when someone has repeated falls?
  5. 05What were the latest ratings and findings for Effective, Caring and Responsive at the previous inspection?

This was an unannounced focused inspection of Safe and Well-led, including infection prevention and control; Effective, Caring and Responsive were not inspected and their ratings carried over from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 9 August 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, August 2022

Rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found kind, responsive care, but risks were not always managed and two regulations remained breached.

This was an unannounced follow-up inspection. Inspectors visited on 6 and 13 July 2022, and inspection activity continued until 18 July. They spoke with people, relatives and staff, and reviewed care plans, risk assessments, medicines records, recruitment files and management documents.

The home had enough staff on the inspection days. Improvements had been made to medicines, accident records, wound care and mealtimes. Staff were caring and people had access to activities, communication support and outside health professionals.

However, some important risks were still not managed consistently. Inspectors found problems with bed rails, diabetes care, catheter positioning and oral care. Management checks had not found these problems quickly enough.

The overall rating remained Requires Improvement. Effective, Caring and Responsive were rated Good. Safe and Well-led remained Requires Improvement. The home had been rated Requires Improvement at the previous inspection and remained in breach of two regulations.

What inspectors praised
  • Enough staff

    Inspectors found enough staff on duty to meet people's needs on the inspection day. Staffing had recently been increased at busy times in the morning.

    “On the day of our inspection there were enough staff on duty to meet people's needs and there was improved oversight of communal areas to maintain people's safety.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Staff were observed to be caring, attentive and respectful. They supported people's privacy, dignity and independence.

    “Staff protected people's privacy and dignity and recognised people's desire to retain their independence as much as possible.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Care plans included information about people's past lives, hobbies and interests. This helped staff have meaningful conversations and offer suitable choices.

    “The service had 'getting to know you' information about people in care plans which contained information about their past lives, hobbies and interests.” from the report
  • Access to healthcare

    The home made referrals to health professionals, including GPs, speech and language therapists and dietitians, when people needed extra support.

    “Records showed that referrals were made to external health professionals including the G.P, Speech and Language Therapist and Dieticians to ensure people had access to the support they needed.” from the report
  • Activities and social contact

    There were group activities and one-to-one time for people who did not benefit from group activities. People were encouraged to use communal areas.

    “During the day we saw the activities co-ordinator spent time with people on a one to one basis to ensure those people who did not benefit from group activities had opportunities for social engagement.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Risks from bed rails

    serious

    Many people had bed rails without the required bumpers. The risks of skin damage and entrapment had not always been identified or reduced.

    “Many people had bed rails without bed rail bumpers.” from the report
  • Oral care was missed

    serious

    One person who needed full support with oral care received it only three times in six days. Oral thrush was not identified until inspectors raised it.

    “The person had developed oral thrush, but this had not been identified until we brought it to the attention of the nurse on duty.” from the report
  • Catheter care

    serious

    Two people's catheter bags were on their beds instead of secured to their legs. This meant they were not positioned in line with the guidance described in the report.

    “Two people's catheter bags were lying on their beds when they should be strapped to the person's leg.” from the report
  • Management checks missed risks

    serious

    Audits did not identify gaps involving diabetes, catheters and bed rail bumpers. Information about changes in people's health was not always shared promptly with staff.

    “Systems did not always ensure the timely sharing of information in response to changes in people's health.” from the report
  • Infection control gaps

    needs fixing

    One communal bathroom had not been cleaned effectively, some clinical waste was not put in the correct bins, and a staff handwashing lapse was observed.

    “Overall, the home was clean but we found one communal bathroom had not been cleaned effectively and some clinical waste had not been disposed of in clinical waste bins.” from the report
  • Noisy mealtime

    minor

    One dining room had both a television and radio on, which inspectors said made the shared mealtime noisy and confusing.

    “In one dining room both the television and the radio were on which made it very noisy and confusing.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What changes have you made to ensure every person's bed rail risk assessment is up to date and the required bumpers are in place?
  2. 02How do you check that people receive the oral care set out in their care plans, and how are problems such as oral thrush identified?
  3. 03How do you make sure catheter bags are positioned correctly and staff receive timely instructions when a person's catheter care changes?
  4. 04What checks now identify gaps in diabetes care, catheter care and other health risks before someone could be harmed?
  5. 05What action has been completed from the provider's action plan, and how will you show families that the two breached regulations are now being met?

This was an unannounced follow-up inspection after the previous rating, covering all five key questions and infection prevention and control under Safe; inspection activity started on 6 July and ended on 18 July 2022. This explanation was written from the published report of 23 August 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Evergreen Manor Care Home

3 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

  1. August 2023Goodcurrent ratingup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Evergreen Manor Care Home →

  2. August 2022Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Evergreen Manor Care Home →

  3. July 2021Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. January 2020

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 15 January 2020.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Warwickshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £950 to £1,260 a week. 77 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“If you bump into her in the night on her way to the bathroom she will still inquire how you are and if everything is alright.”
Caroline C., about Mary K.
“I have never met a person who is so kind and thinks about others before himself to such an extent as Chris Malagala.”
Brian G., about Chris M.
See live-in carers near WarwickshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.