Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Estoril

Goodpublished 8 December 2018, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors found enough staff, appropriate recruitment checks, safeguarding arrangements and safe medicines systems. They also noted that a stair carpet had become worn and was awaiting replacement.
Effective?
Good
Staff had training, induction, supervision and appraisals. People were supported with decision-making, food and drink, healthcare and access to suitable facilities.
Caring?
Good
Staff were kind and understood people's preferences and histories. People were supported to build independence, maintain relationships and have their privacy respected.
Responsive?
Good
Care plans were individualised and regularly reviewed, and people and relatives were involved in planning care. People had communication support and access to activities in the home and local community.
Well-led?
Good
The home had a registered manager, a shared vision and systems to monitor quality. Staff said they were supported, and people were encouraged to give their views.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, December 2018

Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and person-centred care, with the responsive rating improved from Requires Improvement.

Inspectors made an unannounced visit on 26 November 2018. They observed four people, spoke with staff, managers, a healthcare professional and a relative, and reviewed care and service records.

The home was rated Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. Inspectors found enough staff, safe medicines practice, suitable training, kind care and regular involvement of people and relatives in care planning.

The responsive rating improved from Requires Improvement because new care-planning documents had been fully introduced. The overall Good rating stayed the same as at the previous inspection.

What inspectors praised
  • Person-centred care

    Care plans reflected people's individual needs, preferences and goals. Relatives were involved in planning and reviewing care.

    “People had very person-centred support plans in place.” from the report
  • Promoting independence

    Staff encouraged people to take part in daily tasks and develop new skills. People were also supported to take positive risks and achieve goals.

    “People were encouraged to help around the home with daily living tasks and staff told us people had learnt new skills in this way.” from the report
  • Communication support

    Staff supported different ways of communicating, including pictures, basic Makaton and communication boards.

    “We saw staff were very good at ensuring people could communicate in whatever form they found comfortable.” from the report
  • Activities and community life

    People took part in activities they enjoyed and accessed the local community regularly. The report also says people were supported to go on holidays.

    “People accessed the community every day to take part in activities such as bowling, shopping, walks and sports activities.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Inspectors saw people were happy and relaxed with staff. People's dignity, privacy and relationships were supported.

    “People were treated with dignity and respect and their diverse needs were also supported.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Worn stair carpet

    minor

    Inspectors noted that a stair carpet had become worn. The home was waiting for a replacement, so families may want to check whether this has now been dealt with.

    “For example, they told us they were waiting for a new stair carpet to be fitted where this had become worn.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01Has the worn stair carpet been replaced, and are there any other outstanding maintenance issues?
  2. 02How will you support my relative's preferred way of communicating, including pictures, Makaton or a communication board if needed?
  3. 03How will my relative be involved in setting and reviewing their care goals and support plan?
  4. 04What activities and community opportunities would be available for my relative?
  5. 05How do staff support people to take positive risks while keeping them safe?

This was an unannounced inspection covering all five CQC questions, with the Responsive rating improved from Requires Improvement to Good and the other ratings remaining Good. This explanation was written from the published report of 8 December 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Estoril

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. December 2018Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Estoril →

  2. April 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. September 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. February 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. December 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 17 December 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

35 live-in carers within about an hour of Essex

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,020 to £1,260 a week. 25 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“Not only was she professional, polite and efficient but she bought a lovely smile and laughter to my parents home.”
Liz L., about Sithembiso N.
“She brought fun and stimulation into mums life.”
Robert G., about Nechelle F.
See live-in carers near EssexProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.