Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Ecclesbourne Lodge

Goodpublished 22 January 2019, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors found detailed risk plans, suitable staffing, trained staff and safe medicine arrangements. Physical interventions and safeguarding concerns were monitored and reviewed.
Effective?
Good
Staff had the skills and training needed for their roles. People received suitable food, health support and care based on their capacity and best-interest decisions.
Caring?
Good
Staff had caring relationships with people and supported their dignity, privacy, choices and independence. Families were supported to maintain relationships.
Responsive?
Outstanding
Care and activities were highly personalised. Inspectors found strong support for life skills, communication, behaviour, cultural preferences, transitions and individual goals.
Well-led?
Good
The home had a registered manager, supportive leadership and systems for audits, learning from incidents, staff development and working with other services.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, January 2019

Ecclesbourne Lodge was rated Good overall, with Outstanding support tailored to people's needs and independence.

This was an unannounced inspection on 11 December 2018. One inspector reviewed care and medicine records, staff files, training and management information. They spoke with one person, staff, relatives and social care professionals, and observed how staff supported people.

The home supported up to 10 young adults with learning disabilities and autism. There were eight people living there at the inspection. Inspectors found enough staff, safe medicine systems, suitable training and good support with health, food, communication, dignity and choice.

The Responsive rating was Outstanding. Inspectors were particularly impressed by personalised activities, life-skills education, detailed support for behaviour, communication methods and the way families were involved. The other four areas were rated Good, and the overall rating was Good.

What inspectors praised
  • Personalised care

    Staff used people's histories, preferences and communication methods to shape care and daily activities. Families were involved in understanding what worked for each person.

    “People's needs were at the heart of the service being provided.” from the report
  • Building independence

    The home used an education programme to help people gain daily living skills and confidence. Inspectors saw examples of people learning to cook and take part in activities.

    “There was an education programme which provided people with skills to support them with daily life skills and improving their independence.” from the report
  • Support with behaviour

    Behaviour plans were detailed and individual. Staff viewed behaviour as a form of communication and used consistent approaches to help people take part in more activities.

    “The home's ethos was to view these as aspects of communication, this approach had a positive outcome for people as they could see their actions were reflected in daily choice and ongoing needs.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful staff

    Inspectors saw staff spending time with people and responding to their different communication needs. People's privacy, dignity and family relationships were respected.

    “Staff had established caring and supportive relationships with people.” from the report
  • Handling complaints

    Complaints were investigated and people received responses, apologies and outcomes. The home also used concerns and incidents to identify improvements.

    “Complaints had been received and all had been investigated comprehensively, providing the complainant with a formal response, an apology and the outcome.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How would you assess and support my relative's communication needs, including whether they use pictures, symbols, gestures or another language?
  2. 02How are behaviour plans kept up to date, and how are families told about any physical interventions or changes to support?
  3. 03How would you help my relative build independence through the education and life-skills programme?
  4. 04How are medicines that support anxiety or epilepsy reviewed with health professionals, and how are families involved?
  5. 05How would you support my relative's move into the home, including visits, settling in and personalising their room?

This was an unannounced comprehensive inspection covering all five key questions, with the care home premises and care provided both considered. This explanation was written from the published report of 22 January 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Ecclesbourne Lodge

3 rated inspections over 4 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. January 2019Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: OutstandingWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Ecclesbourne Lodge →

  2. July 2016Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. June 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. January 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. January 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. January 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. January 2012

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 17 January 2012.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

62 live-in carers within about an hour of Derbyshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,010 to £1,260 a week. 51 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“Ernest is an amazing professional carer who delivers care from the heart.”
Melanie B., about Ernest C.
“We particularly appreciate the companionship Dawn gives in the evenings when she plays cards and Scrabble with my mother.”
Sarah Y., about Dawn Z.
See live-in carers near DerbyshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.