Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Eastfield Nursing Home

Goodpublished 27 June 2024, 2 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, December 2022

Rated Good; inspectors found people were safe and the home was well-led, but this was a focused inspection of only two areas.

Inspectors visited unannounced on 6 December 2022. One inspector spoke with two people, the manager and three staff members. They observed care and reviewed nine people's care and medicine records, recruitment files and management checks.

The home was rated Good for Safe and Well-led. Inspectors found people were protected from abuse, risks were assessed and reviewed, staffing was sufficient, medicines were managed safely and infection control arrangements were effective.

The service was described as positive, inclusive and person-centred. The inspection followed concerns about how people were supported safely, but inspectors found no evidence that people were at risk of harm from those concerns. The overall Good rating was also based on previous ratings for areas not inspected this time.

What inspectors praised
  • Risk management

    Risks were assessed for each person and reviewed regularly. The assessments covered issues such as falls, skin care, swallowing and moving safely.

    “There were individual risk assessments in place, which were kept up to date by regular reviews.” from the report
  • Medicines

    Medicines were given according to people's prescriptions and choices. Staff training and checks were up to date, and reviews had reduced some people's medicines.

    “Medicines were managed safely and in line with people's prescriptions.” from the report
  • Staffing

    Inspectors found enough staff with the right skills. People said they rarely had to wait for help, and staff used equipment and guidance safely.

    “There were sufficient staff with the right mix of skills to support people safely.” from the report
  • Leadership and culture

    The management team was described as supportive and approachable. Staff worked as a team and people experienced a positive, person-centred culture.

    “There was a positive, inclusive, person-centred culture which people appreciated.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01The report mentions planned improvements to shared areas, outside spaces and a sensory room. Which of these improvements have been completed?
  2. 02How are medicines reviewed now, and has the home continued to reduce medicines where appropriate?
  3. 03Who would be the named nurse for my relative, and how often would they discuss care and support with them?
  4. 04How does the home use incidents, complaints and family feedback to make changes?
  5. 05How does the home assess and regularly review risks such as falls, swallowing difficulties and skin problems?

This was an unannounced focused inspection of Safe and Well-led; the ratings for Effective, Caring and Responsive were not inspected and the overall rating used previous ratings for those areas. This explanation was written from the published report of 29 December 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2022

Inspected but not rated; inspectors found strong infection control and visiting arrangements during the COVID-19 pandemic.

This was an announced, targeted inspection on 21 February 2022. Inspectors looked at infection prevention and control, visiting arrangements and whether COVID-19 staffing pressures were affecting the home.

Inspectors were assured that the home was using personal protective equipment safely, managing testing, supporting safe admissions and visits, and keeping its infection control policy up to date. There were ample supplies of protective equipment and staff had been trained to use it.

The overall service and Safe rating were both recorded as “Inspected but not rated”. This means the visit checked specific COVID-19 arrangements rather than giving a full judgement on the quality of care.

What inspectors praised
  • Infection control

    The home had supplies of protective equipment, trained staff and an up-to-date infection control policy. Inspectors were assured that the home was managing infection risks in several important areas.

    “We were assured that the provider's infection prevention and control policy was up to date.” from the report
  • Safe visiting

    Visits were supported with testing, temperature checks, protective equipment and vaccination checks for relevant staff and professionals. The home also created a visitors' pod.

    “Safe visiting arrangements were in place. Staff and visiting professionals were asked to provide evidence of their vaccination status against COVID-19 prior to entering the home.” from the report
  • Support for wellbeing

    Staff helped people maintain contact with those important to them, including through video calls and adapted visiting arrangements.

    “Staff supported people's social and emotional wellbeing. Alternative forms of maintaining social contact were in place including video calls.” from the report
  • PPE training

    Staff had training on putting on and taking off protective equipment to reduce the risk of spreading infection.

    “Staff had received training on how to 'Don and Doff' (put on and take off) their PPE to reduce the risk of cross-contamination.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What is the current staffing position, and are staffing pressures affecting people's care?
  2. 02Are the infection prevention and control arrangements from this inspection still in place?
  3. 03How are visits managed now, and are there any restrictions or testing requirements?
  4. 04How does the home check that staff use protective equipment correctly?
  5. 05When was the home last given a full inspection rating covering Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control, visiting arrangements and COVID-19-related staffing pressures; it did not provide a full service rating. This explanation was written from the published report of 3 March 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Eastfield Nursing Home

4 rated inspections over 7 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

  1. December 2022Goodcurrent rating
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Eastfield Nursing Home →

  2. March 2022Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Eastfield Nursing Home →

  3. August 2018Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. April 2017Requires improvementstayed Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. February 2016Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. January 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. March 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. November 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 28 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

26 live-in carers within about an hour of Hampshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,020 to £1,260 a week. 23 can care for a couple. 14 years' experience on average.

“I cannot recommend Prisca highly enough, she is one in a million.”
Emily B., about Prisca S.
“He stayed with her throughout the pandemic, refusing to visit his own family, who lived nearby, to reduce the risk of infection.”
Roderick N., about Jaison M.
See live-in carers near HampshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.