Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Downs View Care Centre

Goodpublished 11 May 2026, 4 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2023

Downs View Care Centre was rated Good; inspectors found kind, personalised care and clear improvements since the previous inspection.

The inspection was unannounced and took place on 1 March 2023. One inspector and an expert by experience spoke with people, relatives, staff and healthcare professionals. They also reviewed care records and management records.

The home was rated Good overall. Effective, caring, responsive and well-led were all rated Good. The report does not give a rating for Safe.

The previous inspection rated the home Requires Improvement. Inspectors said people's needs were now fully assessed and care plans were more complete. The home was no longer in breach of Regulation 9 on person-centred care.

What inspectors praised
  • Personalised care

    Care plans included people's histories, choices and preferences. Staff used this information to support daily routines and changing needs.

    “Care plans were detailed, reviewed regularly, and were person-centred, containing people's likes, dislikes and preferences.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful staff

    Inspectors observed staff treating people with care and protecting their privacy. People were encouraged to remain as independent as possible.

    “We observed staff supporting people with care and kindness throughout our inspection.” from the report
  • Activities and relationships

    People could take part in activities inside the home and in the community. These included hobbies, outings and visits from entertainers.

    “People had access to a range of activities both inside the home and in the community.” from the report
  • Improved management

    The home had improved since the previous inspection. Management used surveys, audits and incident information to identify and act on improvements.

    “There was a culture of learning and development within the service.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • One unit still awaiting refurbishment

    minor

    One unit had been refurbished, but the manager said the other unit was still planned for refurbishment and redecoration to make it more dementia friendly.

    “The registered manager told us they were planning to re-furbish and re-decorate the other unit to make it also more dementia friendly.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What progress has been made with refurbishing and redecorating the other unit?
  2. 02How will you assess and respond if my relative's needs change?
  3. 03How do you check that staff follow each person's care plan in practice?
  4. 04How do you manage and review falls, accidents and other incidents?
  5. 05How can my relative and our family give feedback or make a complaint, and how will we be told what action was taken?

This was an unannounced inspection covering Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led; the report does not give a Safe rating, and the other ratings from the previous inspection are not stated as carried over. This explanation was written from the published report of 16 March 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, September 2022

Downs View Care Centre rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found good safety and leadership after major improvements, but three areas were not inspected.

This was an unannounced follow-up inspection on 08 September 2022. Two inspectors and an Expert by Experience visited, spoke with people, relatives and staff, observed care, and checked care, medicine, staffing and management records.

The home was rated Good for Safe and Well-led. Inspectors found that risks were assessed, medicines were managed safely, staffing levels met people's needs, infection controls were in place, and managers had improved checks and learning after incidents.

The overall rating is Requires Improvement because this visit only checked Safe and Well-led. The other three areas were not inspected, so their earlier ratings were used for the overall result. The home had previously been rated Inadequate and placed in Special Measures, but inspectors found enough improvement for it to leave Special Measures and no longer breach regulations.

What inspectors praised
  • Safer risk management

    Care plans and risk assessments gave staff clear instructions about risks such as falls, choking, weight loss and diabetes.

    “Risks to people were managed. Risk assessments included details of potential risk, level of risk and how it would affect people.” from the report
  • Medicines

    Medicines were given by trained staff. Records matched stock balances and information for medicines given when needed was in place.

    “Medicines were managed safely and administered by suitably trained staff. Staff followed safe procedures when administering people their medicines.” from the report
  • Enough staff

    Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs. People and relatives also said staffing levels were sufficient.

    “There were sufficient staffing levels to ensure people's needs were continually met.” from the report
  • Improved leadership

    The manager had introduced regular audits and checks. Inspectors found that issues were acted on and lessons were learned from incidents.

    “There was effective oversight of all areas of the service. Systems were in place to continually monitor the quality and standards of the service through regular audits and checks.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Not all areas were checked

    minor

    This was a follow-up inspection rather than a full inspection. Effective, Caring and Responsive were not assessed during this visit, so the overall rating still Requires Improvement.

    “For those key questions not inspected, we used the ratings awarded at the last inspection to calculate the overall rating.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What are the current ratings for Effective, Caring and Responsive, which were not assessed during this visit?
  2. 02How do you make sure the improvements to risk assessments and medicines management continue when staff or residents' needs change?
  3. 03How are staffing levels calculated from people's needs, and how do you respond if those needs increase?
  4. 04What happens after an accident, incident or safeguarding concern, and how are lessons shared with staff?
  5. 05How can relatives raise concerns or give feedback, and how quickly will the management team respond?

This was an unannounced follow-up inspection of Safe and Well-led after an earlier Inadequate rating; Effective, Caring and Responsive were not inspected and their previous ratings carried over. This explanation was written from the published report of 27 September 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Downs View Care Centre

7 rated inspections over 7 years: the service has improved, from Requires improvement to Good.

  1. March 2023Goodcurrent ratingup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Downs View Care Centre →

  2. September 2022Requires improvementup from Inadequate
    Well-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Downs View Care Centre →

  3. May 2022Inadequatedown from Requires improvement
    Safe: InadequateEffective: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Inadequate

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. August 2021Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. February 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. March 2020Outstandingup from Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: OutstandingResponsive: OutstandingWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. May 2017Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. February 2016Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. August 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. December 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  11. August 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  12. March 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  13. April 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  14. November 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 26 November 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

44 live-in carers within about an hour of Swindon

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £990 to £1,280 a week. 34 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“Linet became her carer and all changed, my daughter started eating, taking her medications and more important her happiness came back.”
Lita R., about Linet Wanjiku M.
“She was very caring, kind and patient to all his needs, she built up a wondetful rapport with him, she was dedicated and was there for him through good times as well as through the tough times”
Katrina O., about Sekai M.
See live-in carers near SwindonProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.