Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Douglas Court

Goodpublished 10 January 2020, 6 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Requires improvement
Inspectors were assured about infection prevention, including PPE, testing, cleaning, safe admissions and managing outbreaks. The provider also said it had measures to reduce risks from COVID-19-related staffing pressures.
Effective?
Good
This was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
Caring?
Good
This was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
Responsive?
Good
This was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
Well-led?
Good
This was not assessed in this targeted inspection.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2022

Douglas Court was inspected but not rated; inspectors found strong infection control measures during a COVID-19 outbreak.

Inspectors made an unannounced, targeted visit on 16 February 2022. They looked at infection prevention and control and asked about staffing pressures linked to COVID-19.

They were assured that the home was managing infection risks. This included visitor checks, testing, personal protective equipment, cleaning, safe admissions, isolation and staff cohorting.

The home provided a garden visiting pod and another safe visiting area. The inspection did not give a new overall rating or a rated score for Safe.

What inspectors praised
  • Infection checks

    Visitors and staff were checked for symptoms, and people living in the home had their temperatures checked twice a day.

    “all staff and the visitors had their temperature checked automatically upon entering the building” from the report
  • Protective equipment

    The home had PPE and hand-sanitising stations. Visitors had to take a lateral flow test and wear protective equipment.

    “The provider had installed PPE stations in the reception and all around the building, including an automatic hand sanitising station.” from the report
  • Outbreak management

    During the COVID-19 outbreak, the home used isolation and separated groups of staff to reduce infection spread.

    “During the active outbreak of COVID-19, the provider put measures in place to reduce the spread of the infection.” from the report
  • Safe visiting

    Families and friends could use a visiting pod in the garden or a safe visiting space in the conservatory.

    “The provider had installed a visitor's pod in the garden which meant that families could have a comfortable, relaxed visit without risk.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What infection control measures are in place now, and how have they changed since the February 2022 outbreak?
  2. 02How does the home manage staffing pressures when staff are absent because of COVID-19?
  3. 03Are visitors still required to have checks, testing or protective equipment, and can visits take place in the visiting pod or conservatory?
  4. 04How does the home manage isolation and staff cohorting if there is another infection outbreak?
  5. 05What are the current ratings for Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led, given that this inspection did not assess them?

This was an unannounced targeted inspection of infection prevention and control and COVID-19-related staffing pressures; it did not assess the other four key questions or provide a new overall rating. This explanation was written from the published report of 10 March 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, April 2021

Inspected but not rated; inspectors found strong infection-control arrangements during the COVID-19 pandemic.

This was an unannounced, targeted inspection on 18 March 2021. Inspectors looked at how the home prevented and controlled infection during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Inspectors were assured that the home used personal protective equipment safely, followed social distancing and shielding rules, tested people and staff, and had arrangements for preventing and managing outbreaks.

The home had a garden visitors pod and another visiting area in the conservatory. Staff had infection-control training, extra PPE stations were available, and whiteboards helped people communicate while staff wore face masks.

The service was inspected but not rated. This report does not give an overall quality rating or ratings for the other four questions.

What inspectors praised
  • Safer family visits

    The home had created a garden visitors pod and a safe visiting space in the conservatory.

    “The provider had installed a visitors pod in the garden which meant that families could have a comfortable, relaxed visit without risk.” from the report
  • PPE and infection training

    Staff had training in using PPE and COVID-19 infection control. Inspectors saw PPE being used in line with current guidance.

    “Staff had received training in donning and doffing personal protective equipment (PPE), and we saw this was accessible throughout the home and staff used it in accordance with the most up to date guidance.” from the report
  • Infection-control planning

    The home had an up-to-date infection-control policy, supporting policies and audits showing that actions had been taken.

    “The infection control policy was up to date. We reviewed audits which reflected actions had been taken to maintain the standards within the home.” from the report
  • Communication support

    Whiteboards were used to help people communicate with staff and visitors when face masks made communication difficult.

    “People had found communication difficult with face masks on, but the whiteboards had helped to support this.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are visits arranged now, and is the visitors pod or another safe visiting space still available?
  2. 02How do you make sure staff continue to use PPE correctly and have up-to-date infection-control training?
  3. 03How are new admissions tested and kept safe from infection?
  4. 04What arrangements are in place to prevent and manage an infection outbreak?
  5. 05What other CQC ratings or more recent inspection findings should we consider for care, staffing and management?

This was an unannounced targeted inspection of infection prevention and control during the COVID-19 pandemic; it did not assess the other four key questions and the service was not rated. This explanation was written from the published report of 2 April 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Douglas Court

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. March 2022Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Douglas Court →

  2. April 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Douglas Court →

  3. January 2020Goodstayed Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. December 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. February 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. November 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. January 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. December 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 7 December 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

78 live-in carers within about an hour of Derby

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,020 to £1,260 a week. 62 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“We particularly appreciate the companionship Dawn gives in the evenings when she plays cards and Scrabble with my mother.”
Sarah Y., about Dawn Z.
“Rachel is a quietly spoken, extremely caring person and looked after Val very well.”
Raymond W., about Rachel K.
See live-in carers near DerbyProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.