CQC report explained · a nursing home
What the CQC found at Culverhayes Nursing Home
Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.
- Safe?
- Good
- People were supported safely, with safeguarding procedures, risk assessments, pressure area guidance, enough staff and safe medicines systems. Inspectors identified unlocked refurbishment rooms and chipped paintwork, but action was taken or planned during the inspection.
- Effective?
- Good
- This area was not inspected during this visit. Its previous rating was carried forward.
- Caring?
- Good
- This area was not inspected during this visit. Its previous rating was carried forward.
- Responsive?
- Good
- This area was not inspected during this visit. Its previous rating was carried forward.
- Well-led?
- Good
- Inspectors found a positive and open culture, clear roles, effective audits, appropriate complaint handling and good partnership working. Relatives said they were not always involved in care planning or reviews.
What inspectors found, December 2023
Culverhayes Nursing Home is Rated Good; inspectors found people were supported safely, but noted some smaller safety and involvement issues.
This was an unannounced, focused inspection on 1 November 2023. Inspectors checked whether people were safe and whether the home was well-led. They spoke with people, relatives, staff and the interim manager, observed care, and reviewed care plans, medicines records, recruitment files, complaints and audits.
The inspection followed concerns about personal care, pressure area care, and an allegation of physical abuse and neglect. Inspectors found no evidence that people were at risk of harm from these concerns. They found good safeguarding, enough staff, clear risk guidance and improvements in medicines checks since the previous inspection.
The home was rated Good overall, with Safe rated Good and Well-led rated Good. The other three areas were not inspected during this visit, so their previous ratings were used to calculate the overall rating.
Safeguarding and risk care
Staff understood safeguarding and followed people's care plans and risk management guidance. Inspectors saw people being repositioned regularly and pressure-relieving equipment used appropriately.
“People were supported safely. Staff had a good understanding of safeguarding and acted in people's best interest where necessary.” from the report
Staffing
Inspectors found enough staff to support people safely. Staff recruitment checks were completed, although the approach to repeating DBS checks was not fully risk-assessed.
“There were enough staff to support people safely. One staff told us: "I have never experienced a staff shortage, the manager will arrange cover if it is needed.” from the report
Medicines improvements
The home had improved its medicines auditing since the previous inspection. Inspectors found medicines were stored safely and people received them as prescribed.
“At the last inspection we recommended the provider review their auditing processes around medication, particularly around identifying where medicines were not stored at safe temperatures and stock balances of medication. We found improvements had been made in these areas.” from the report
Leadership and teamwork
Staff described a positive team culture, regular supervision and useful training. Inspectors found clear roles, effective audits and appropriate handling of the one complaint received since the previous inspection.
“There was a positive and open culture within the service. Staff described the service as a "whole team process" which worked well.” from the report
Activities and outside support
People could choose from individual trips, group activities and activities at the home. The home worked with health professionals and made referrals when needed.
“There were different types of activities available such as 1:1 trips out, group activities and 1:1 activities at the service.” from the report
Unsecured refurbishment rooms
seriousTwo rooms contained paint cleaner and power tools and were left unlocked and unattended at points during the inspection. The manager acted after this was raised, but this could have put people living with dementia at risk.
“These rooms were left unattended and unlocked at points throughout our inspection, which could have presented a risk to people living with dementia.” from the report
Chipped paintwork
needs fixingSome paintwork was chipped and needed repair. Inspectors said this could prevent effective cleaning and create an infection control risk. The home said repairs were part of ongoing maintenance work.
“This presents an infection control risk as it prevents these areas from being cleaned effectively.” from the report
DBS checks
minorRecruitment checks had been completed, but DBS checks were not repeated at regular intervals in line with best practice. The home had not shown that it had considered the risk of this approach.
“However, it was not evident the risk of this had been considered.” from the report
Family involvement
minorSome relatives said they were not always involved in care planning or care plan reviews. The home explained its review process and later held a meeting to explain it to relatives.
“Relatives told is they were not always involved in the care planning process or care plan reviews of their relative.” from the report
- 01How will you make sure refurbishment rooms are locked and safe whenever work is taking place?
- 02When will the chipped paintwork be repaired, and how do you manage the infection control risk while this is outstanding?
- 03How do you decide when staff DBS checks should be repeated, and how is that risk recorded?
- 04How will you make sure relatives are invited to care planning meetings and care plan reviews?
- 05Which areas of care were not assessed during this inspection, and when were they last reviewed?
This was a focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the ratings for Effective, Caring and Responsive were carried forward from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 23 December 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
What inspectors found, June 2023
Culverhayes Nursing Home is rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind care, but medicines checks had gaps.
This was an unannounced, focused inspection on 9 and 10 May 2023. Inspectors looked mainly at whether people were safe and whether the home was well-led. They reviewed care records, wound care plans, audits and recruitment files, and spoke with people, relatives, staff and professionals.
Inspectors found people were protected from avoidable harm. Risk assessments were reviewed, staffing levels met people's needs, call bells were answered quickly and infection control arrangements were suitable. People received their medicines as prescribed, but records for some over-the-counter remedies were not accurate and one medicine fridge was recorded above the recommended temperature.
The home was rated Good overall, with Safe rated Good and Well-led rated Good. Inspectors made a recommendation that the home improve its medicines checks. The previous overall rating was also Good, published in July 2018.
Staffing and response
Inspectors found there were enough staff to meet people's needs. Call bells were answered quickly and relatives described a consistent team.
“There was enough staff to meet people's needs. Call bells were responded to swiftly and we observed staff responding quickly to people when they needed support.” from the report
Risk management
Care risks such as falls, malnutrition, skin damage and choking were assessed and reviewed. Care plans gave staff clear instructions about reducing these risks.
“When risks were identified, care plans provided clear instructions for staff about how to reduce the risks.” from the report
Safeguarding
Staff had safeguarding training and understood how to identify and report possible abuse. The manager worked with the local safeguarding team when needed.
“Staff understood their responsibilities to protect people from avoidable harm and abuse.” from the report
Positive leadership
Relatives and professionals said the management team was approachable and responsive. Staff were supported to reflect on incidents and learn from them.
“Relatives and professionals told us the service was well-led.” from the report
Medicine stock records
needs fixingRecords for homely remedies were not consistently completed. Stock balances did not always match, some administration dates were missing and one medicine was given to a staff member.
“The stock of these medicines was not well managed.” from the report
Medicine fridge temperature
needs fixingA medicine fridge was recorded above the manufacturer's recommended range on six occasions and was at 10.3 degrees on the inspection day. Staff had not recorded what action they took when temperatures were out of range.
“However, staff had recorded the temperature of one medicine fridge as being above medicine manufacturer guidance on six occasions” from the report
- 01What checks are now in place to make sure homely remedy stock balances and administration dates are accurate?
- 02How do you check that medicine fridge temperatures stay between 2 and 8 degrees?
- 03What action is taken and recorded when a medicine fridge temperature is outside the recommended range?
- 04How have you checked that the concerns about pressure ulcer care remain fully addressed?
- 05How will you monitor whether the medicines recommendation has been completed and sustained?
This was an unannounced focused inspection of Safe and Well-led only; the other key questions were not assessed during this inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 2 June 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Culverhayes Nursing Home
4 rated inspections over 8 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.
- December 2023Goodcurrent ratingstayed GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- June 2023Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodWell-led: Good
- July 2018Goodstayed GoodSafe: GoodWell-led: Good
- January 2016GoodSafe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good
- February 2014
Report published without a new overall rating.
- October 2013
Report published without a new overall rating.
- July 2012
Report published without a new overall rating.
- May 2011
Report published without a new overall rating.
- January 2011
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 13 January 2011.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.
Weigh the report against the rest
Fees, photos and reviews from families
How to read CQC ratings and reports
What to check when you visit
25 live-in carers within about an hour of Bath and North East Somerset
These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.
Most charge £1,030 to £1,320 a week. 20 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.
“She enabled mum to lead a high quality life in her own home until the very end and Lena and her family became close personal friends to me and my family.”
Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.