CQC report explained · a nursing home
What the CQC found at Copperfields
Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.
What inspectors found, August 2021
Rated Requires Improvement overall; inspectors found kind, person-centred care, but training, records and management checks needed improvement.
This was the home’s first inspection. Inspectors visited without notice on 19 April and 7 May 2021, then continued checking information remotely until 12 May. They spoke with people, relatives and staff, observed care, and reviewed care, medicine, recruitment, training and management records.
People were treated with kindness and respect. Staff knew people well, staffing levels were reported to be sufficient, medicines were handled safely, and people had access to health professionals, therapy and activities. Inspectors also found a positive atmosphere and person-centred care.
There were important gaps in some records. Risk information, care plans and records about oral care and pressure ulcer prevention were not always complete or up to date. Staff training and supervision were also not always at the level expected by the provider’s own policy. The overall rating was Requires Improvement, with Safe, Caring and Responsive rated Good, and Effective and Well-led rated Requires Improvement.
Kind and respectful care
Inspectors saw caring interactions and a calm atmosphere. People and relatives also described staff as kind and compassionate.
“We found staff were kind and caring and there was a calm and happy atmosphere.” from the report
Staffing levels
People and staff said there were enough staff to meet people’s needs. Inspectors observed staffing that supported people safely, including one-to-one care where needed.
“People and staff told us there were more than sufficient staff to support people safely, and we observed this.” from the report
Health and therapy support
The home involved outside health professionals and had its own physiotherapy and occupational therapy support to help people achieve their goals.
“The home had its own physiotherapist, occupational therapist and assistants to support people to achieve their goals.” from the report
Meaningful activities
The home adapted activities during lockdown and provided activities designed around people’s interests and wellbeing.
“This evidenced how the service recognised the use of meaningful occupation to support wellbeing during the lockdown.” from the report
Care and risk records
needs fixingSome care plans and risk records were duplicated, not current or missing important detail. Inspectors said this created a risk that care might not be provided appropriately, even though staff knew people well.
“Some sections in care records were not always up to date or accurate to reflect people's needs.” from the report
Staff training and supervision
needs fixingThere were gaps in training, including areas staff said they wanted more help with. Supervision was not happening as often as the provider’s policy required, and annual appraisals had not yet started.
“Staff had not received supervision in line with the provider's policy of between four to six times each year.” from the report
Recruitment checks
needs fixingSome recruitment files did not show conduct checks from previous employers or evidence of qualifications. One reference was obtained several months after the person started work.
“Recruitment records available during the inspection, did not contain evidence of conduct in all previous employments or checks to evidence candidates' qualifications.” from the report
Management oversight
needs fixingAudits were being carried out, but they had not consistently identified or resolved problems with records, recruitment checks and supervision. Inspectors recommended a review of the home’s governance arrangements.
“We recommend the provider review their governance arrangements to address these inconsistencies and ensure records are up to date, accurate and effective.” from the report
- 01What has been done to make sure care plans and risk assessments are now complete, accurate and kept up to date?
- 02How often do staff now receive supervision, and have annual appraisals started?
- 03What extra training do staff receive about behaviour that challenges others and safe holds?
- 04How do you check that recruitment files contain references, employment conduct checks and evidence of qualifications before staff start?
- 05How do you record and review care for people at risk of pressure ulcers or who may decline oral care?
This was the first inspection of the newly registered home and covered all five key questions, including infection prevention and control under Safe; some information was reviewed remotely after the visits. This explanation was written from the published report of 19 August 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.
Every inspection of Copperfields
Each visit the CQC has published, newest first, back to the day the home was registered.
- August 2021Requires improvementcurrent ratingSafe: GoodEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement
- October 2019
Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 4 October 2019.
Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.
Weigh the report against the rest
Fees, photos and reviews from families
How to read CQC ratings and reports
What to check when you visit
At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Leeds
These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.
Most charge £980 to £1,250 a week. 89 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.
“Carla has been a god send with the implementation of bringing mum back home from respite care.”
“Took his time to learn about me read my care plan and to listen to me. great companionship with lots of laughing.”
Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.