Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Clare Lodge Care Home

Goodpublished 31 July 2026, 2 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, May 2018

Clare Lodge Care Home is rated Good; inspectors found kind, personalised care, with some medicines record-keeping needing improvement.

The inspection was unannounced and took place on 16 April 2018. One inspector observed care, spoke with people, relatives, staff and managers, and reviewed care records, medicines records, training records and quality checks.

The inspectors found that people were safe and received care that met their needs. Staff were described as kind and respectful. People had choices about their care, food and activities, and staff knew their personal routines and preferences.

The home was rated Good overall and Good in all five areas: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. This was the same rating as at the previous inspection in November 2015. Some improvements were needed in medicines records, best-interest decision records and recruitment documentation.

What inspectors praised
  • People felt safe

    People and relatives said they felt safe. Risks such as falls, moving and handling, bedrails and pressure ulcers were assessed and reviewed.

    “People received their care and support when they needed it and wanted it and staff went about their duties in a calm and organised way.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Staff treated people with courtesy and kindness. They protected privacy and dignity while encouraging people to remain as independent as possible.

    “Staff were always courteous and kind towards people they supported, often sharing banter and jokes between each other in a respectful and dignified way.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Staff knew people's backgrounds, routines, likes and dislikes, and used this knowledge to shape their support.

    “Staff were knowledgeable about people's preferred routines, likes and dislikes, backgrounds and personal circumstances and used this to good effect in providing them with personalised care and support that met their individual needs.” from the report
  • Food and health support

    People had food choices and support to eat and drink. The home responded to individual diets and worked with health professionals when needed.

    “People were provided with appropriate levels of support to help them eat and drink in a calm, relaxed and patient way.” from the report
  • Activities and complaints

    The home provided activities linked to people's interests and planned to increase activity-coordinator hours. Complaints were investigated and resolved.

    “Concerns and complaints raised by people who used the service or their relatives were appropriately investigated and resolved.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Medicines records

    needs fixing

    Records were not always accurate for medicines prescribed at a variable dose or to be taken as needed. The provider created an action plan to improve audits and monitoring.

    “We checked a random sample of boxed medicines and found that record keeping was not always accurate in respect of medicines prescribed as a variable dose or 'as needed' (PRN).” from the report
  • Best-interest decision records

    needs fixing

    The records did not always give a clear trail showing how decisions made in people's best interests had been reached.

    “Further work was needed to ensure that records provided a clear audit trail of how decisions made in people's best interest had been reached.” from the report
  • Recruitment documentation

    needs fixing

    Inspectors advised verifying references and adding more detail to application forms so gaps in previous employment could be explored.

    “More detail was needed within application forms to enable them to explore any gaps in prospective staff member's previous employment history.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What changes were made to records for variable-dose and as-needed medicines after the inspection?
  2. 02How do you now check that medicines records are accurate and regularly audited?
  3. 03How are best-interest decisions recorded, and can you show how the decision-making process is documented?
  4. 04How are references verified and gaps in applicants' employment histories checked?
  5. 05What activities are currently available, and did activity-coordinator hours increase from 18 to 30 hours a week as planned?

This was an unannounced inspection covering all five key questions; the report says the overall rating and each question rating remained Good. This explanation was written from the published report of 23 May 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Clare Lodge Care Home

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. May 2018Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Clare Lodge Care Home →

  2. December 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. July 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. February 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. May 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 6 May 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Hertfordshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,300 a week. 82 can care for a couple. 12 years' experience on average.

“She handled the new situation in front of her with such professionalism and I felt I could trust her 100%.”
Siobhan D., about Sithabile Tabile M.
“She was v competent and confident and we felt our mum was safe in her care. She supported us through a difficult time.”
Lucy D., about Loritha C.
See live-in carers near HertfordshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.