Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Church Farm Nursing Home

Goodpublished 20 July 2019, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors found enough staff, suitable risk assessments, safe medicines procedures and clear emergency plans. Staff had safeguarding training and recruitment checks were completed.
Effective?
Good
People's health and care needs were assessed and staff had relevant training. People were supported with food, drinks, healthcare, mobility and decisions about their care.
Caring?
Good
Staff treated people with kindness, dignity and respect. People and relatives said they were involved in decisions, and inspectors saw positive, good-humoured relationships.
Responsive?
Good
Care plans included people's routines, preferences, communication needs and interests. People were supported with activities, faith, complaints and end of life wishes.
Well-led?
Good
Managers and staff understood their roles and relatives found the service approachable. Regular audits, meetings and improvement plans were used to monitor and improve care.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, July 2019

Church Farm Nursing Home was rated Good in all five areas; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care with strong leadership.

This was a comprehensive inspection on 15 and 20 May 2019. The first day was unannounced. Inspectors spoke with people living there, relatives, staff, managers and health professionals. They also observed care and checked care, medicines, recruitment, training and quality records.

The home supported 44 people across three areas and specialised in dementia care. Inspectors found enough staff, safe medicines systems, clean surroundings and suitable plans for emergencies. People received food, healthcare and activities that matched their needs and preferences.

Inspectors saw staff treating people with kindness, dignity and respect. People and relatives were involved in decisions where possible. The home had regular checks, improvement plans and a positive culture focused on person-centred care.

The home was rated Good for Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. It was also rated Good at the previous inspection, published in January 2016. The report says the service met the characteristics for Good in all five areas.

What inspectors praised
  • Staffing and safety

    Inspectors found enough staff to meet people's needs and keep them safe. Staffing levels were reviewed and increased when necessary.

    “There were enough staff to keep people safe.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    Staff knew people as individuals and used positive language. Inspectors saw warm relationships, laughter and good-humoured conversations.

    “Staff clearly respected each person as an individual, supporting them with kindness and good-humour.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Care plans recorded people's routines, preferences and communication needs. Staff supported activities, choices and meaningful interests.

    “People's care plans were detailed, containing information about how they liked to be supported, their daily routines and preferences.” from the report
  • Strong management checks

    The provider checked care and the building regularly. Audits led to action plans showing what needed to be done and who was responsible.

    “The provider undertook audits of all aspects of the service to review the quality of care, and identify areas where improvements were needed.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Feedback process still being developed

    minor

    The provider had identified the need for a new way for people and relatives to give feedback about care. Ask whether this has now been put in place.

    “they had identified the need to create a new feedback process for people and relatives to share their views on the quality of care.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How many staff are normally on duty in each area, and how do you increase staffing when people's needs change?
  2. 02How does the electronic medicines system work, and how are staff checked as competent to administer medicines safely?
  3. 03What dementia care training do staff receive, and how are staff matched to the different support needs in each area?
  4. 04What has happened to the planned new feedback process for people and relatives?
  5. 05How are each person's end of life wishes recorded, reviewed and shared with staff and relatives?

This was a comprehensive inspection covering all five key questions, including the care provided and the premises. This explanation was written from the published report of 20 July 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Church Farm Nursing Home

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. July 2019Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Church Farm Nursing Home →

  2. January 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. October 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. December 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. November 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 9 November 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

75 live-in carers within about an hour of Nottinghamshire

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,260 a week. 63 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“Ernest is an amazing professional carer who delivers care from the heart.”
Melanie B., about Ernest C.
See live-in carers near NottinghamshireProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.