Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Carers Choices

Goodpublished 11 August 2018, 8 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
Inspectors found safeguarding procedures, reviewed risk assessments, safe recruitment and enough staff. Medicines were managed safely where staff provided this support, and incidents were monitored.
Effective?
Good
Staff received induction, training, supervision and appraisals. People were supported with food, healthcare and day-to-day choices, and staff understood the principles of the Mental Capacity Act.
Caring?
Good
People and relatives described staff as kind, compassionate and caring. Inspectors found that privacy, dignity, independence and involvement in care planning were respected.
Responsive?
Good
Care plans recorded people's needs, preferences and how they wanted to be supported. Plans were reviewed regularly or when needs changed, and there were arrangements for complaints and accessible information.
Well-led?
Good
Inspectors found a visible manager, supported staff and a positive, person-centred culture. Audits, meetings, questionnaires and other checks were used to monitor the service.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, August 2018

Carers Choices was rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with some improvement work still in progress.

This was a comprehensive, announced inspection carried out on 16 and 19 July 2018. The inspector reviewed care files, staff records, medicines arrangements, policies and quality checks. They also spoke with a person using the service, relatives, care staff and managers, and considered questionnaire responses.

The agency provided short-term respite care, domiciliary care and home support. Inspectors looked only at people receiving a regulated activity. They found that people were safe, staff were trained and supported, and care was kind, respectful and tailored to individual needs.

All five areas were rated Good: Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. The overall rating stayed Good because inspectors found no serious risks or concerns and said the evidence continued to support this rating.

What inspectors praised
  • Consistent staffing

    People and relatives said they received support from a consistent team. Feedback also said staff were punctual, stayed for the allocated time and did not miss calls.

    “People and relatives told us they received care and support from a consistent team of staff and told us how important this was to them.” from the report
  • Kind and respectful care

    People and relatives described staff as caring and compassionate. Inspectors found that staff respected privacy and dignity and promoted independence.

    “People and relatives told us they received support from staff who were caring, compassionate and kind.” from the report
  • Staff training and support

    New staff received induction and staff had ongoing training, supervision and appraisals. Staff said managers were available to provide support and guidance.

    “Staff continued to receive training and support to enable them to meet the individual needs of people.” from the report
  • Quality monitoring

    The agency used audits, meetings and questionnaires to check the quality of its service and gather people's views. Inspectors found questionnaire responses were very positive.

    “Systems were in place to regularly monitor the quality of the service being provided.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Personalisation project not finished

    minor

    A document designed to record the small things that matter to each person was still being introduced. The agency said it was already making a difference, but the work was not complete at the inspection.

    “It is still work in progress, but we are finding it is making a big difference.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How will you match care workers to my relative's preferences, including any preference about the worker's gender?
  2. 02How will you make sure staff know about my relative's medicines, risks and changing needs?
  3. 03How far has the 'Simple Pleasures' document been completed for people using the service?
  4. 04If my relative's needs change, how quickly will their care plan be reviewed and staff informed?
  5. 05Which staff have completed end-of-life care training, and what support is available if this care is needed?

This was a comprehensive inspection of the regulated activity, covering 15 of the 48 people using the agency; other people and activities were not included. This explanation was written from the published report of 11 August 2018 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Carers Choices

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. August 2018Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Carers Choices →

  2. March 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. May 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. July 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. October 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. August 2012

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 13 August 2012.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

35 live-in carers within about an hour of Essex

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,020 to £1,260 a week. 25 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“Not only was she professional, polite and efficient but she bought a lovely smile and laughter to my parents home.”
Liz L., about Sithembiso N.
“She brought fun and stimulation into mums life.”
Robert G., about Nechelle F.
See live-in carers near EssexProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.