Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Cambridge Nursing Home

Goodpublished 5 October 2019, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Requires improvement
Inspectors were assured about infection prevention and control, including PPE, testing, cleaning, visiting and safe admissions. They also asked about staffing pressures linked to COVID-19.
Effective?
Good
This area was not covered by the targeted inspection.
Caring?
Good
This area was not covered by the targeted inspection.
Responsive?
Good
This area was not covered by the targeted inspection.
Well-led?
Good
This area was not covered by the targeted inspection.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2022

Cambridge Nursing Home was inspected but not rated; inspectors found good infection control arrangements during the COVID-19 review.

This was an announced, targeted inspection on 09 February 2022. Inspectors looked at infection prevention and control, and asked about staffing pressures linked to COVID-19.

Inspectors found the home had up-to-date infection control policies, regular audits and trained staff. They were assured that PPE, testing, cleaning, visiting arrangements and admission procedures were being managed safely.

The home had 46 people living there, with space for up to 49. The service was inspected but not rated, so this report does not give a new overall quality rating.

What inspectors praised
  • Infection control policies

    The home had policies and procedures for preventing and controlling infection. Inspectors found the environment clean and safe.

    “The provider had policies and procedures regarding the prevention and control of infection.” from the report
  • PPE and testing

    Staff had access to PPE and took regular COVID-19 tests. Staff also received infection prevention and control training.

    “Staff received training in infection prevention and control. They wore appropriate PPE.” from the report
  • Visits were supported

    The home had arrangements for relatives to visit in line with current guidance and encouraged people to stay in contact with relatives.

    “There were arrangements in place for relatives to visit their loved one in accordance with current guidance.” from the report
  • Risk checks and audits

    The management team assessed COVID-19 risks and carried out regular infection prevention and control audits.

    “The management team carried out regular infection, prevention and control audits and followed national guidance to ensure people, staff and visitors were safe.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How have your infection prevention and control arrangements changed since the inspection on 09 February 2022?
  2. 02How do you currently manage COVID-19 testing, isolation and outbreaks?
  3. 03How do you make sure there are enough staff when COVID-19 causes staffing pressures?
  4. 04What rules currently apply to visits, and how do you help residents keep in contact with relatives?
  5. 05How do you check that staff and visiting professionals meet the current vaccination or exemption requirements?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control and COVID-19-related staffing pressures; it did not provide ratings for the other areas of care. This explanation was written from the published report of 26 February 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, November 2020

Inspected but not rated; inspectors were assured about infection control, including visits, testing, PPE and cleaning.

This was an announced inspection on 10 November 2020. It was part of a CQC review of infection prevention and control in care homes during the coronavirus pandemic.

Inspectors found good practice. Visits followed current guidance, with a separate visiting area, visitor risk checks and temperature checks. People who could not have visits were supported to keep in touch electronically.

The home had arrangements for regular Covid-19 testing, enough personal protective equipment, trained staff and measures for positive test results. Cleaning schedules, records and infection control audits were also in place.

The home was inspected but not rated. This report does not give an overall quality rating. It only reports on infection prevention and control, under the Safe question.

What inspectors praised
  • Safer visiting

    Visitors used a designated area and completed a risk assessment. People who could not receive visitors were encouraged to keep in touch electronically.

    “There was a designated visiting area which visitors reached directly from the garden.” from the report
  • Testing and outbreak planning

    The home had arrangements for regular Covid-19 testing and measures to protect people and staff after a positive test.

    “The provider had made appropriate arrangements to test people and staff for Covid-19 and was following government guidance on regular testing.” from the report
  • PPE and cleaning

    The home had enough PPE, staff had been trained to use it, and cleaning was recorded and checked by management.

    “Cleaning schedules were in place and there were systems for recording completed cleaning.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How are visits currently arranged, and do visitors still complete a risk assessment before coming in?
  2. 02How often are people using the home and staff tested, and what happens if someone tests positive?
  3. 03How do you make sure there is enough PPE and that staff use it correctly?
  4. 04How often are cleaning records checked and infection control audits carried out?
  5. 05What are the home's current ratings for care areas that this inspection did not assess?

This was an announced thematic inspection of infection prevention and control, reported mainly under Safe; the other four questions and the overall service were not rated. This explanation was written from the published report of 19 November 2020 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Cambridge Nursing Home

4 rated inspections over 4 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. February 2022Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Cambridge Nursing Home →

  2. November 2020Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Cambridge Nursing Home →

  3. October 2019Goodup from Requires improvement
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. November 2018Requires improvementdown from Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. September 2016Goodstayed Good
    Safe: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. July 2015Good
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. November 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. November 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. June 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. December 2012

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  11. December 2010

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 29 December 2010.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Redbridge

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,250 a week. 75 can care for a couple. 10 years' experience on average.

“Sidonia is a first class live-in carer whose dedication and thoughtfulness made her stay a happy experience.”
Martin B., about Sidonia M.
“Charity would take Nan on holidays day trips and shopping adventures”
Bateman S., about Charity N.
See live-in carers near RedbridgeProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.