Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a nursing home

What the CQC found at Camberwell Lodge

Goodpublished 4 December 2024, 22 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2023

Rated Requires Improvement; inspectors found caring support but serious concerns about safety, staffing, medicines and management.

This was the home’s first inspection. Inspectors visited on 12 and 13 December 2022. They spoke with people, relatives, staff and managers, reviewed care and medicine records, and contacted more relatives afterwards.

The home was rated Requires Improvement overall. Safe and Well-led were rated Requires Improvement. Inspectors found problems with pressure care, medicines, staffing levels, call bell response times and checks intended to identify risks.

Effective, Caring and Responsive were rated Good. People were usually treated kindly and with dignity. Inspectors also found personalised care plans, activities, support with healthcare and planning for end of life care.

What inspectors praised
  • Kind and respectful care

    Most people said staff treated them with kindness, dignity and respect. Inspectors observed positive interactions and found that people's choices and preferences were recorded.

    “Most people told us they were treated with respect and dignity from kind and caring staff.” from the report
  • Personalised care

    Care plans included people's life history, hobbies, preferences and communication needs. Daily records helped staff understand how people responded to their care.

    “Care plans contained a good level of detail to ensure staff would understand people's personal preferences in all aspects of their care and support.” from the report
  • Activities and social contact

    The home offered communal activities, one-to-one support and trips outside the home. Inspectors saw technology being used to provide suitable stimulation.

    “The home had wellbeing coordinators who devised daily communal activities and provided one-to-one interaction for people who could not join these.” from the report
  • Support with end of life wishes

    People were supported to record their wishes for future care, pain relief, funeral arrangements and resuscitation decisions. The home also worked with the local hospice service.

    “People shared their end of life wishes with staff and these details were recorded on their advanced care plan.” from the report
  • Staff training and support

    Staff received induction, ongoing training and supervision. Inspectors found staff had training in areas including safeguarding, medicines and end of life care.

    “Staff were supported through an induction and ongoing training and supervision.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Pressure care and skin safety

    serious

    Pressure care records were not always up to date, dressings were not always changed as recommended, and 13 mattresses were set incorrectly. This increased the risk of skin breakdown.

    “In total we found 13 people's mattresses were incorrectly set which meant they were exposed to greater risk of skin breakdown.” from the report
  • Medicines management

    serious

    Some medicines prescribed when needed did not have enough instructions. Stock records did not always match actual stock, some administration records were unsigned, and topical creams were not recorded clearly.

    “Medicines were not always managed safely.” from the report
  • Staffing and call bell delays

    serious

    Staffing levels sometimes fell below the home's own calculated minimum. Call bell records showed many waits of more than five minutes, including some of more than 30 minutes.

    “The call bell records for November, December and January showed many occasions when people were waiting longer than 5 minutes and some instances where people waited over 30 minutes.” from the report
  • Weak quality checks

    needs fixing

    Audits and checks failed to identify or fix several problems. An issue with mattress settings had been identified in October but remained until the inspection in December.

    “There were a range of quality assurance audits and checks in place, however they had not identified all the issues we found with pressure care, medicines and staffing and call.” from the report
  • Complaints not fully used

    needs fixing

    Although complaints were investigated under the home's policy, some family members were unhappy with the responses. Investigations did not identify the staffing problems inspectors found.

    “Some people told us they were not happy with how their complaint had been dealt with as not all aspects of their complaint were fully investigated.” from the report
  • Late notification to CQC

    serious

    The provider did not notify CQC promptly about an incident involving the police and had not notified the relevant family member at the time. The notification was submitted after inspectors raised it.

    “They had failed to notify us of an incident involving the police.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What has changed to ensure pressure-relieving mattresses are set correctly and dressings are changed when professional guidance says they should be?
  2. 02How many nurses and care staff are now on each floor and each shift, including at weekends?
  3. 03What is the current average and longest call bell response time?
  4. 04How are medicines prescribed when needed, stock levels and topical creams now checked and recorded?
  5. 05What action has been taken in response to complaints about staffing, and how are families told about improvements?

This was the first comprehensive inspection of the newly registered home and covered all five CQC questions. This explanation was written from the published report of 10 February 2023 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Camberwell Lodge

Each visit the CQC has published, newest first, back to the day the home was registered.

  1. February 2023Requires improvementcurrent rating
    Safe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvement

    Read what inspectors found at Camberwell Lodge →

  2. May 2022

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 19 May 2022.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Southwark

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £980 to £1,210 a week. 81 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“She cared for my mum with Alzheimer's with endless patience and kindness, always arriving with a smile and a positive attitude”
Marie-anne B., about Carla A.
“The interaction she gives my mother is incredible, singing, dancing, taking her to groups, on plenty of walks which mum always loves.”
Naomi C., about Joyce C.
See live-in carers near SouthwarkProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.