Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Bywell House Care Home

Goodpublished 9 January 2026, 8 months ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, March 2022

Bywell House Care Home was inspected but not rated; inspectors found good infection-control arrangements during a COVID-19 outbreak.

This was a targeted inspection on 10 February 2022. Inspectors looked at infection prevention and control during a COVID-19 outbreak. They also asked about staffing pressures and whether these affected care.

The home was closed to most visitors during the outbreak. Staff and visiting professionals were checked, tested and required to use protective equipment. Inspectors were assured that infection risks were being managed, and found the home clean and hygienic.

The inspection did not give an overall rating or a rated result for Safe. It was not a full inspection of all five areas, so the report does not provide current ratings for Effective, Caring, Responsive or Well-led.

What inspectors praised
  • Infection control

    Inspectors were assured that the home had arrangements to prevent and manage infection. These included testing, protective equipment, visitor controls and an up-to-date policy.

    “We were assured that the provider was making sure infection outbreaks can be effectively prevented or managed.” from the report
  • Staff precautions

    Staff were fully vaccinated, tested daily and trained to use protective equipment safely.

    “All staff working at the home had been fully vaccinated and completed daily lateral flow device tests before coming to work.” from the report
  • Clean environment

    The home was ventilated, clean and hygienic. The provider had also bought equipment to disinfect parts of the building.

    “A machine had been purchased that could be used to thoroughly clean parts of the home; this sprayed a fine mist that helped to disinfect and sanitise the premises.” from the report
  • Visitor arrangements

    Visits were controlled during the outbreak, with testing and protective equipment requirements described for when visiting restarted.

    “The provider followed government guidance and visits to the home by relatives and friends were arranged by appointment.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Close contact in communal areas

    needs fixing

    Many people did not understand social distancing, and the layout meant people could be close together in communal areas. Inspectors said risks had been assessed and steps were taken to reduce the risk of serious infection.

    “The majority of people did not understand the concept of social distancing, and the layout of the home meant that people were in close contact with each other in communal areas.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How do you now manage infection risks when people are close together in communal areas?
  2. 02What arrangements are in place for visits during an outbreak, including testing and protective equipment?
  3. 03How often are people and staff tested during an outbreak, and what happens when a result is positive?
  4. 04How do you make sure staffing pressures do not affect people's care?
  5. 05When was the last full inspection covering Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control, with questions about staffing pressures; it did not rate the other four key areas. This explanation was written from the published report of 10 March 2022 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

An earlier report, explained

What inspectors found, April 2021

Bywell House Care Home: targeted infection-control inspection found good practice, but the service was not rated overall.

Inspectors visited on 25 March 2021. This was an announced, targeted inspection focused on infection prevention and control during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The home had recently reopened for new admissions after a COVID-19 outbreak. Inspectors found good arrangements for visitors, including testing, appointments, protective equipment and cleaning. People kept in touch with relatives by video calls when the home was closed.

Inspectors were assured about infection control, testing, protective equipment, cleaning, laundry, staffing and the management of outbreaks. The service was marked inspected but not rated, so this report does not give an overall quality rating.

What inspectors praised
  • Visitor safety

    Visitors had to book in advance and receive a negative rapid test before visiting. They were given protective equipment, and visits usually took place in a separate chalet that was cleaned between visits.

    “Visitors were supplied with Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) such as masks, aprons and gloves.” from the report
  • Infection-control systems

    Inspectors found systems to prevent infection, including staff training and checks on hand-washing, access to protective equipment and regular cleaning.

    “The home had introduced and maintained effective systems and processes to prevent the spread of infection.” from the report
  • Testing arrangements

    Staff had regular rapid and laboratory tests, and people living at the home had regular laboratory tests, with exemptions noted for some people who had previously had COVID-19.

    “Staff undertook twice weekly LFD tests and weekly Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) tests.” from the report
  • Staffing and laundry

    Inspectors saw that laundry, including soiled items, was managed safely. They also found enough staff to support people safely.

    “There were sufficient staff to support people safely.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about

Inspectors raised no specific concerns in this report.

Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01What infection-control arrangements are now used for visits, including testing, protective equipment and appointment rules?
  2. 02How would you manage a new infection outbreak, and how would relatives keep in touch if visits had to stop?
  3. 03How often are staff and residents tested now, and how are staff checked on hand-washing and other infection-control practices?
  4. 04When was the home last inspected in areas other than infection control, and what ratings were given?

This was a targeted inspection of infection prevention and control under the Safe question; the service was inspected but not rated in this report and the other questions were not assessed. This explanation was written from the published report of 27 April 2021 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Bywell House Care Home

2 rated inspections over 2 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. March 2022Inspected but not ratedcurrent rating
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Bywell House Care Home →

  2. April 2021Inspected but not rated
    Safe: Inspected but not rated

    Read what inspectors found at Bywell House Care Home →

  3. November 2017Goodstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. September 2015Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. October 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  6. April 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  7. June 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  8. May 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  9. May 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  10. February 2011

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  11. January 2011

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 11 January 2011.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

28 live-in carers within about an hour of West Sussex

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £1,020 to £1,170 a week. 23 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

See live-in carers near West SussexProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.