Skip to content
The Care Home DirectoryEvery care home in England

CQC report explained · a residential care home

What the CQC found at Brookfield

Goodpublished 5 February 2019, 7 years ago

Rated Good: inspectors found the home performing well and meeting their expectations.

The five questions inspectors ask
Safe?
Good
People were protected from abuse and harm, staffing levels were sufficient, and recruitment checks were carried out. Medicines, fire safety and infection control were also checked and found to be in place.
Effective?
Good
Staff had completed relevant training and supported people with nutrition, health appointments and daily choices. The inspectors found that the Mental Capacity Act and deprivation of liberty requirements were being followed.
Caring?
Good
Staff were kind and friendly, and positive relationships had developed. People were supported with privacy, dignity, family contact and community involvement.
Responsive?
Good
Care records were personalised and explained people's needs, preferences and ways of communicating. People were supported with activities and staff took action to meet individual wishes.
Well-led?
Good
The manager and provider used audits, meetings and monitoring visits to check the service. Feedback from people, relatives and professionals was collected, and identified actions were followed up.
The latest report, explained

What inspectors found, February 2019

Rated Good; inspectors found safe, kind and personalised care, with all five areas remaining Good.

This was an unannounced inspection on 28 September 2018. One inspector spoke with people, staff and health professionals, observed care, and reviewed care, recruitment and other records.

The inspectors found that people were safe, supported by enough staff and given their medicines as prescribed. Staff had suitable training, followed people's care plans and supported people with food, health needs and activities.

People were treated kindly and supported to make choices, stay in contact with family and take part in community activities. The home had systems to check quality, and all five areas were rated Good, as at the previous inspection.

What inspectors praised
  • Safe staffing and recruitment

    The inspectors found enough staff on duty and consistent staffing levels. Recruitment checks included references and DBS checks.

    “Staffing levels were sufficient to meet the needs of people using the service.” from the report
  • Kind relationships

    People described staff as kind and welcoming. Staff were observed speaking in a friendly manner and supporting people to stay connected with family and the community.

    “Positive relationships had developed between people and staff.” from the report
  • Personalised support

    Care records included people's likes, dislikes, routines and preferred ways of being supported. Staff used this information in day-to-day care.

    “People's care records were personalised and contained details of their likes, dislikes, personal preferences and preferred daily routines.” from the report
  • Activities and independence

    People took part in activities such as church, horse riding, baking and swimming. Staff also supported individual goals and social opportunities.

    “People were supported to regularly engage in activities.” from the report
  • Quality checks

    The home had regular audits, provider monitoring visits and meetings with residents and relatives. Actions identified through checks were completed in a timely way.

    “Audit systems were in place to monitor the quality of the service being provided.” from the report
What inspectors were concerned about
  • Family communication

    minor

    A relative had asked for more communication from the home. The report says this was acted on through regular calls, but families may wish to check how communication works now.

    “a parent had requested for more communication from the home.” from the report
Questions to ask them, based on this report
  1. 01How will you keep me regularly updated about my relative's care and wellbeing?
  2. 02How will you make sure my relative's care plan reflects their current preferences, routines and communication needs?
  3. 03What activities and community opportunities would be available for my relative?
  4. 04How are medicines, risks and any changes in health checked and recorded?
  5. 05How do you involve families in meetings, feedback and decisions about care?

This was an unannounced inspection covering all five quality areas; the report used a shorter format because the overall rating had not changed from the previous inspection. This explanation was written from the published report of 5 February 2019 by an AI system and checked against the report text: every quoted line appears in the report. It is a guide to the report, not a substitute for it. Read the full report on cqc.org.uk.

The story over the years

Every inspection of Brookfield

2 rated inspections over 3 years: the service has held its Good rating throughout.

  1. February 2019Goodcurrent ratingstayed Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    Read what inspectors found at Brookfield →

  2. February 2016Good
    Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good

    We are reading this report · the original is on cqc.org.uk

  3. July 2014

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  4. June 2013

    Report published without a new overall rating.

    Read this report on cqc.org.uk

  5. June 2012

    Registered with the Care Quality Commission on 29 June 2012.

Ratings and report dates from the Care Quality Commission, Open Government Licence v3.0. A home can also be visited without a new rating being published, so the timeline shows published inspections.

Next steps

Weigh the report against the rest

Care at home

At least 100 live-in carers within about an hour of Coventry

These are self-employed carers on PrimeCarers, the introductory agency that runs this directory. Each has a profile with their own rates and reviews from families, and you choose who to talk to.

Most charge £950 to £1,260 a week. 80 can care for a couple. 11 years' experience on average.

“If you bump into her in the night on her way to the bathroom she will still inquire how you are and if everything is alright.”
Caroline C., about Mary K.
“My mum would not eat, drink, bath nor sleep without her. In short, she was FAMILY and we loved her dearly”
Susan O., about Vivian A.
See live-in carers near CoventryProfiles, rates and reviews are free to look at.

Every carer has had an enhanced DBS check in the last 18 months, ID and right-to-work checks and an online interview. Their skills and training are for you to check with them. Carers set their own rates, and who is free changes week to week.